• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Medicaid Blend Rate Misses the Point

    Conservatives should beware of policies that simply meet a budget target number without considering whether the underlying policy changes move a program in the right direction. Case in point: the Medicaid blend rate, which would replace the various federal matching rates for different categories of enrollees with one unified federal rate.

    Yes, those on the left are attacking the blend rate proposal that would set one federal match rate in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). That could lead conservatives to think it must be a good idea. But this misses the point. Conservatives need to judge these proposals based on whether they advance conservative principles for fundamental Medicaid reform. This proposal has several problems:

    • No real budget. First, unlike a block grant approach, this plan does nothing to put the federal share on a fixed budget. Under the block grant proposals, the federal contributions are capped at a dollar amount (and indexed from there). Under the blend rate, the federal share is still open-ended and therefore provides no long-term spending protections for taxpayers.
    • Strict federal control. Second, unlike the block grant approach, this plan offers states nothing in exchange. Under the leading block grant proposal, states are given extensive new flexibility and opportunities to manage their programs without massive federal interference. Under the blend plan, states are shackled with the same federal mandates—just with less federal money to administer them.
    • Ignores the main problem. Finally, all the commentary seems to sidestep the biggest issue facing Medicaid: the enormous expansion of the program enacted under Obamacare. No wonder the left is panicking. More than half of the promised reductions in the number of uninsured are dependent on expanding Medicaid. The left must certainly recognize that if the program already struggles to provide quality care and access to current beneficiaries, how in the world will it manage close to 25 million more Americans?

    When it comes to Medicaid, the left typically argue or concede many of the problems in the program. The difference is that their solution is more money. Conservatives need to have their own solution, and it is not more of the same.

    Now is the time for Congress to quit kicking the can down the road. Medicaid needs to be and should be reformed. In its fiscal plan, The Heritage Foundation outlines its plan for reforming Medicaid, starting with fully repealing Obamacare (and its unbearable Medicaid expansion). From there, it puts Medicaid on a budget with all other anti-poverty programs, mainstreams healthy moms and kids into private coverage, and (with the continued help of the federal government) gives states the tools and flexibility needed to provide quality care at lower costs to the most vulnerable in society. Any proposal should make significant progress toward this outcome.

    The last time Medicaid was a serious part of a budget discussion, conservatives introduced important policy changes such as cost sharing based on income, limiting loop holes for eligibility, and loosening the benefit package restrictions, including for private coverage. At the very least, this round of budget talks related to the debt ceiling should focus on expanding those policy ideas that would save money for both state and federal taxpayers. As we highlighted last week, more bad health policy is the last thing lawmakers should consider as a solution to the federal government’s spending problem.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Medicaid Blend Rate Misses the Point

    1. West Texan says:

      Why are states accepting the fed's Medicaid bribe? Domestic healthcare is a states' issue. Here in Texas, sales and county property taxes already help to cover such costs. This places the burden on state and local government to create incentives for jobs and property ownership. I believe this is better known as prosperity. Obama and gang could sure learn a lot from Texas. Unfortunately, their Yankee arrogance has displaced what little grey matter they had to work with.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.