• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • National Education Association Convention Fails to Benefit Teachers or Improve Education

    Another year, another reminder that the National Education Association (NEA) is a far-left organization that is grossly out of step with the views of millions of teachers and works diligently to maintain the failed status quo for children. At the union’s convention this year, labor leadership endorsed resolutions, amendments, and new business items that seem far from benefiting their members or improving education.

    The NEA’s new business items included:

    • Support for the DREAM Act: “New Business Item 11. Consistent with relevant NEA documents, the NEA will continue to support the passage of the Dream Act or any similar federal legislation that provides a pathway for undocumented college students to obtain a Green Card and eventual citizenship.”
    • Support for single-payer health care: “New Business Item 19. NEA will join with other unions in the Labor Campaign for Single-Payer Healthcare to amplify our advocacy for universal single payer health care.”
    • Support for liberal political activism: “New Business Item 91. (referred to executive committee) Through existing media, NEA will support, publicize, and encourage members to participate in the ‘Rebuild the Dream’ movement launched by Van Jones, moveon.org and others.”
    • Opposition to alternative teaching recruitment: “New Business Item 93. NEA will publicly oppose Teach for America (TFA) contracts when they are used in Districts where there is no teacher shortage or when Districts use TFA agreements to reduce teacher costs, silence union voices, or as a vehicle to bust unions.”

    Conservative teachers in forced-unionism states are being forced to support such actions. In 28 forced-unionism states, educators must join the union and fork over hundreds of dollars in dues each year if they wish to teach. And by the NEA’s own admission, 50 percent of the union’s members consider themselves more conservative than liberal, meaning a great number of teachers are being forced to support liberal causes to which they are philosophically opposed.

    But it’s not just teachers. Taxpayers are also supporting the NEA’s efforts in supporting Obamacare and working with Moveon.org. Funding for local school systems gleaned from taxpayers directly finances teacher salaries, a portion of which goes to union dues.

    To that end, the newly adopted bylaw amendment 3 increases member dues by $10, 60 percent of which will be used “to assist state affiliates in dealing with ballot measures and legislative crises.”

    It’s not just children across the country who are being adversely affected by special interest groups like the NEA, who work to oppose reform efforts such as school choice. Teachers and other education employees should have a choice in whether they join a union and a choice in whether a portion of their salaries are used to support causes with which they may not agree.

     

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to National Education Association Convention Fails to Benefit Teachers or Improve Education

    1. Ratgirl says:

      "forced-unionism states"? No such animal. I assume you are referring to agency fees, which must be negotiated and are not mandated by any state.

      • chimera says:

        When I taught in Ohio, I was required to join the union. No union membership = no job. I would call that a forced unionism state.

    2. J.S.Bridges says:

      "Agency fees" is simply a euphemism for required payment of union dues by any teacher in one of the states where the NEA and/or AFT have obtained, over the years, enabling laws mandating negotiation of such fees (on a local-district basis) as a part of mandatory collective-bargaining agreements between district school officials and union units. Said "negotiation" consists of the inclusion in such agreements of the requirement that such fees equal – surprise! – 100% of the union dues, less a nominal opt-out amount which is alleged to cover "political-action fees or contributions", and that the fees will be collected/deducted in the same manner as union dues for the other bargaining-unit members.

      Such agreements are in effect in – now that Wisconsin is allowing an opt-out – 27 states. These are, therefore, truthfully termed "forced-unionism states". One is not forced to participate in union activities – although, in many cases, there is considerable pressure, on a local basis, to do so – but "membership" is not optional. Whether you take an active part or not, you pay.

      There are similar provisions in the law in such states regarding other kinds of labor unions, as well.

      This is de facto mandatory union "membership" – there is no choice involved; either you sign the agreement that allows deduction of the "fees", or you do not teach there. No exceptions – it's a "closed shop" agreement, enabled by the state and required by the union(s).

      Calling a sheep a goat doesn't make it a goat.

    3. Bobbie says:

      No such animal? My child has a part time job, forced to join the union!!! FORCED, when hired.

      Hopefully people will come to see the more entities controlling our everyday lives (freedom,) the less free we really are!

      When unions DICTATE the logo "WE ARE ONE" tells me NO ONE is an individual!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×