• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Guest Blog: Rep. Blackburn on Why Obama Can't Regulate His Regulators

    Bureaucrats have bolted a restrictor plate to our economic engine and flagged private sector job growth to the pits. The same independent government agencies, that use explicit intimidation and threats of government taking to impose “voluntary” regulations on job creators, aren’t even willing to hold themselves to the same standard. They refuse.

    That was the theme of yesterday’s hearing in the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Members of Congress were exploring President Obama’s Executive Order 13563 and its non-application to the independent agencies.

    The independent agencies have refused to “voluntarily” comply with the order. Obama’s modest order would simply require a justification of the costs and burdens of new regulations and a retrospective analysis of existing rules. However, these agencies believe their political ends justify their regulatory means. They believe their insulation from traditional checks and balances gives them a blank check to be hyper-regulators in pursuit of hyper-activist causes.

    It’s important to understand the reason why regulators are resisting voluntary compliance with Obama’s order: they can’t justify their costly rules and mandates. Congress and the American people are right to raise more questions instead of delegating more power and authority. The reality is, some bureaucrats in Washington are facing an existential challenge where, to justify their purpose, they invent new problems and manipulate evidence to superimpose new regulations from everything to lead in 4-wheelers to children’s cereals. Just last month CPSC Commissioner Nancy Nord blew the whistle on this culture of hyper-regulation in Wall Street Journal:

    … we are regulating at an unprecedented pace and have pretty much abandoned any efforts to weigh societal benefits from regulations with the costs imposed on the public… under this administration, we have ignored the recent direction to look for and eliminate burdensome regulations. We are just too busy putting out new regulations. I have repeatedly requested that the agency do cost-benefit analysis on our various regulations only to have that request voted down by my fellow commissioners on a party-line basis. Consequently, we are issuing regulations without having done the necessary work to understand the impact of our actions both on those being regulated and on the public. As a result we have imposed regulatory burdens and caused people to lose their livelihoods without a real payback in terms of safety. At the CPSC, common sense regulation doesn’t even get a head-nod.”

    We see the same problem across the independent agencies. When I asked FCC Commissioner McDowell if the FCC had to satisfy a more robust justification of its net neutrality orders using market power analysis or a cost-benefit analysis whether the Commission would have reached the same conclusion he responded simply: “Yes, because the process was outcome driven.” His response was an indictment of the FCC, proving that we need to move these agencies away from being driven by activists pursuing social outcomes to being grounded in regulatory humility and statutory obedience. The FCC’s refusal to even identify market failure of the Internet is just another example of why Congress needs to take up my Internet Freedom Act (H.R. 96). We need to do so in order to free ourselves from the FCC’s plans to regulate our positive online experience through their proposed Internet Iron Curtain.

    With today’s news that the country has moved back to 9.2% unemployment, now is the time to get the government off our backs and focus on jobs. A recent report by the Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies found in their econometric analysis that:

    “Even a small 5% reduction in the regulatory budget (about $2.8 billion) is estimated to result in about $75 billion in expanded private-sector GDP each year, with an increase in employment by 1.2 million jobs annually. On average, eliminating the job of a single regulator grows the American economy by $6.2 million and nearly 100 private sector jobs annually. Conversely, each million dollar increase in the regulatory budget costs the economy 420 private sector jobs.”

    Conservatives understand that these agencies don’t know how to make the best individual decisions for us: what foods we eat, what toys we buy, what privacy setting we want on our mobile devices, or what light bulbs we prefer. Any new regulations must require concrete examples of market failure and true consumer harm because there is no room for additional burdens on American industries and consumers without showing just cause.

    We must get the independent agencies to comply with Executive Order 13563 – it’s just the first step to apply a very modest and narrow approach at getting away from more big government. Tell Congress to support efforts that seek robust regulatory reform, greater accountability, and fewer top-down approaches.

    Representative Marsha Blackburn represents the 7th District of Tennessee in the United States House of Representatives.

    The views expressed by guest bloggers on the Foundry do not necessarily reflect the views of The Heritage Foundation.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Guest Blog: Rep. Blackburn on Why Obama Can't Regulate His Regulators

    1. Bobbie says:

      also shows deeper concern of these deliberately imposed uncertainties. Obama shows no favor in Americans or our values and principles with transparency!!


      forget the name calling, Republicans. No merit, just immaturity. And those attacking aren't likely to vote for you anyway. Obama has his base. A big herd of sheep! But true Americans from all incomes, all skin colors and immigrant status, aren't fooled!

      Stand firm especially for Obama's base. They deserve the chance to rise above and see the truth!!!! And for anybody calling anyone a racist, hold him to it and ask "under what definition?"

      I've never heard any Republican address any American by skin color or race yet it's ALL I HEAR FROM DEMOCRATS, the true party with history of racism! Republicans show a healthy character of professionalism and outstanding class of honesty and good will toward all people of America. Their work exemplifies the need for America''s recovery while derelict democrats distort and defame and hide their accountabilities that brought us where we are today. Not where tax dollars are efficiently spent and undeserving to America!

    2. @mikezaneis says:

      @marshablackburn: "these agencies don’t know how to make the best individual decisions for us: what foods we eat, what toys we buy, what privacy setting we want on our mobile devices, … Any new regulations must require concrete examples of market failure and true consumer harm …"

    3. greg says:

      Why can't Congress stop itself from self implosion

    4. FlLady says:

      I can only assume that any congressman who is not pushing to stop spending MUST be in bed with special interests who are only interested in controlling more money and more regulations.

      Support HR 2409: bill to REDUCE the debt limit.

    5. Sarah Natividad says:

      Thank you, Rep. Blackburn, for pointing at the tip of the iceberg that is the out-of-control CPSC. (BTW I thoroughly enjoyed your smackdown of that Kids In Danger lady at the CPSIA hearings, the one who couldn't produce a single victim of lead poisoning. You took her to SCHOOL!)

      For those who haven't been following the CPSIA debacle, basically CPSC got stuck having to enforce an unenforceable law that requires children's bicycles and ballpoint pens to meet a physically impossible lead content standard, so rather than make the best of it they decided to take it all the way to its absurd and logical end. They've declared adult novelties to be "children's products", scared the bejeesus out of school supply companies who are now afraid of heavy fines for selling pens to elementary schools, and made rocks in geology class have to be tested for "sharp points".

    6. PatriotDave says:

      I wholeheartedly agree with agree with the comments posted here. First it was safe foods, then safe and effective medications, then clean air and clean water, then seat belts. Then congress passed burdensome regulations on businesses, banks, and credit card companies making billions of dollars on harmless little white lies. Where will this end? It should be every American's right to knowingly produce products that poison or harm others or don't match their claims, or to scam others out of their money. Furthermore, it should be every American's right to be poisoned, harmed, or scammed. That is freedom. What don't these left-wing idiots in Congress understand about that.

    7. fg8578 says:

      I agree with Rep. Blackburn that many of these agencies and commissions are out of control.

      Congress could fix that, if they wanted to. They could revise the various enabling statutes to put these independent agencies under the Executive, or Congress could issue a separate statute requiring a cost-benefit analysis of every rule considered by every agency (executive or independent).

      But I'm not holding my breath . . ..

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.