• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • NEA Convention Reminds Us: It’s About Union Power, Not Children

    It’s hard to forget former National Education Association (NEA) General Counsel Bob Chanin’s farewell address during the 2009 NEA national convention. “It is not because we care about children; and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child,” Chanin boasted. “The NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.”

    To kick off this year’s conference, the NEA had several plenary sessions from Monday through Wednesday in advance of the main convention. The sessions were designed to “explore actions that create stress—actions that foster such a tension that the people who scorn us will have to listen and will have to negotiate.”

    The very first speaker at the NEA’s plenary session “State of the Union on Our Civil Rights” was Benjamin Todd Jealous, of the NAACP. (That’s the group whose chapter head in New York, Hazel Dukes, recently called a concerned parent a tool of “slave masters” for supporting her daughter’s local charter school in a NEA/NAACP lawsuit against charters.)

    Plenary sessions also included the NEA’s Joint Conference on Concerns of Minorities and Women, where attendees were invited to learn about how “minority students are more than an abstraction or a political slogan—they are real children and young people with real hopes and dreams. How can we make sure education reform works for them and isn’t done to them?”

    Of course, this is absolutely right. That’s why we support parental choice in education to put those students’ needs—not the needs of a failed system—first. But one has to wonder if the session included the objective, empirical analysis of charter schools, voucher programs, and school choice options across the country that shows that educational choice is doing more to increase the academic outcomes of poor and minority children than the failed status quo has ever accomplished. We’re not holding our breath.

    Conference attendees also had the opportunity to attend discussions that were less focused on education. Attendees could learn about “Overcoming the Backlash to Minority Population Growth” and “Defeating Attacks on Educators and Union Rights.” The NEA also took the opportunity to use its national convention to train members in civil disobedience in defense of “union rights” with a session called “Civil Disobedience and Direct Action in the Cause of Social Justice.”

    Having trouble figuring out what all of this has to do with the education of millions of American schoolchildren? You’re not alone. That’s because the interests of teachers unions are not necessarily aligned with the needs of students. The unions are political machines whose modus operandi is maintaining the inflated benefits and lifetime job security of their members.

    But that often means opposing reforms that are in the best interests of children—reforms such as ending forced unionism (which Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker recently achieved), ending lifetime job security for underperforming teachers, linking pay to performance, and, of course, school choice. These reforms are in the best interests of students because they create an education system that is accountable to parents and taxpayers, better aligning the interests of all parties involved.

    Sadly, the education unions’ foremost concern is not the needs of children. As former American Federation of Teachers president Al Shanker infamously quipped: “When school children start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children.”

    The NEA’s national convention highlights the fact that as a group, the education unions have misguided priorities. With some 3.2 million of their members in local schools as teachers and school support personnel, NEA leadership should not block reforms that are in the interests of schoolchildren.

    Which is why it’s imperative that teachers are given a choice as to whether they must join the union and that parents be provided options about where they send their children to school. Until the union hold is broken, the education system—not children—will continue to work for the adults—i.e., politicians and public-sector employees who benefit from organized labor’s stranglehold. The NEA convention is a sad reminder of that.


    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to NEA Convention Reminds Us: It’s About Union Power, Not Children

    1. Bobbie says:

      We want teachers with sincerity not teachers with union backing!!! We didn't ask for unions to compromise the skills of those educating our children. And we didn't ask for teachers to be paid according to union bargaining but to be paid according to educational standards of qualifications proven in their job performance.

      This man speaks on focus which is not what we asked for when the focus is on power and not education. The unions promote government interests which are direct conflicts of the money being paid for their use. Remove the feds! Remove the unions! They serve in opposition of the best interest of the people and students.

      Ever since the involvement of feds and unions, the mental capacity in students have drastically decreased to a narrowing level. Public education does serve a healthy serving of societal attitude that is shared abroad and at home! NO!! THANKS!! Remove their worthlessness…

      We didn't ask for limitations on our children's abilities to think freely and for themselves using their individual minds! Government regulations destroys the mines potential that won't ever live up to it's fullest!

    2. Israel says:

      Voters in New Jersey, where all 120 State Senate and Assembly seats are up for election this November, now have the opportunity to end the hegemony of these destructive unions, by supporting those candidates who champion the Parental Rights Program Act (S2914/A4033). This legislation will provide equal educational opportunity for every child in New Jersey via parental choice in education, by having the money follow the child to the school chosen by the parents.

    3. Ardath Blauvelt says:

      The quotes are stunning.
      I don't think people blame the rank-and-file teachers for their Union's behavior but it is strange that our teachers are such sheep. It might, in part, explain what's wrong with our education at which, contrary to defense, medical care, illegal immigration, and others, we throw as much money at as we dare, as opposed to reforming, making more effective and competitive.

      • John says:

        Spoken like a true non educator. Taken out of context. Try research it works. Ever have a teacher tell you not to believe everything you see or read on the internet. Photoshop and clipping included. UNIONS are doing great things in schools. Stop trying to think you know anything about a professional field of expertise you are not involved in. Do you tell your brain surgeon how to operate too?

    4. Bobbie says:

      Spoken like a true government union sheep.

      I'm a parent, government puppet. I see it all, spinner! Public education is phony! A self educated person is a much more effective educator. The focus isn't indoctrination. To get a degree for public education is as easy as 1,2,3 especially if you're in the protected class. No qualifications necessary, no accountabilities to hold. You only have to pass kindergarten to be an educator today! worthless, overpaid, over benefitted, insincere, dummying down, danger running education.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.