• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Shell Game Is Not an Energy Policy

    Releasing 30 million barrels of petroleum from strategic reserves is not an energy policy, and it is not an especially useful response to either short-run or long-run pressures on gasoline prices. Because the release is scheduled to stop in 30 days, market adjustments will partially offset the release’s impact in the short run. And in the long run, there is no additional output. In fact, the current released oil will need to be replaced in the future.

    Most of OPEC is producing at capacity, so the notion that it is an effective cartel is suspect. Even if it were an effective cartel, the real threat to its dominance would be a sustained increase in production, not a shell-game swapping of petroleum reserves.

    The U.S. has about 1.08 billion barrels of petroleum reserves—about 725 million of which are in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The remaining barrels are privately controlled and are used to buffer short-run changes in demand and to hedge against price changes. If traders think prices will rise, they hold more in private reserves to sell later at the higher price. If traders think prices will fall, they sell reserves to take advantage of the relatively higher current price.

    From the beginning of the year until the third week in May, private crude oil reserves rose by more than 40 million barrels, with nearly 17 million barrels added in the final five weeks. In the month that followed, the reserves declined by 14 million barrels. Though current reserves are high compared to historical averages, they are not within 30 million barrels of their peak.

    So, if the SPR draw down and replenishment signals to the market that there will be a slightly lower price now than previously expected—and a period of slightly higher prices than previously expected will follow—there very likely will be some offsetting changes in private reserves. It would be like the bank calling to tell you it transferred money from your savings account into your checking account. If that’s not what you wanted, you would transfer the money back into savings, and your spending would not change. Indeed, the current price has mostly erased the downward blip that immediately followed the president’s announcement of the SPR release.

    On the other hand, policies that increase actual production will change the price. To continue the banking analogy: If you got a raise, your income would rise and so would your long-run spending. Moving money from one account to another does not make anybody richer. Getting a raise does.

    To help gasoline consumers, the president should work to open up access to the billions of barrels of petroleum reserves in the U.S. Instead, the administration continues blocking access to our own petroleum production and slow-walking permits where access is allowed.

    Cross-posted from National Journal

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Shell Game Is Not an Energy Policy

    1. fmrusmcrntx says:

      This was nothing more than political gamesmanship on the part of the White House and is already proving to be a complete failure! On an at least semi-related note, Rasmussen Polling today states that 51% of the people polled regarding energy believe that: "51% Say Gov't Should Force Oil Companies To Use Profits To Develop Alternative Energy". This is very scary, and demonstrates that the left's radical enviro-wacko "climate change propaganda originated by Al "Pinocchio" Gore is working well in our current polarized society which is being driven by junk science & scare tactics perpetuated by the lame-stream media! :( Heritage, please help debunk this stuff! Thanks for your great work! :)

    2. Greg says:

      Something that has disturbed me for a long time…. natural gas… we make cars that run on natural gas and we sell them to … canada and europe. How much could we save if we forced cars to convert to NG? Cleaner air as a side benefit. No one talks about that…. well, Slim Pickens did for awhile. We have the worlds largest reserves of NG…. let's get started.

      • Hank says:

        "if we forced cars to convert to NG" – we need less tyranny by government, not more of it!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×