• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Rumsfeld: Cutting Defense 'A Grievous Mistake'

    As the White House and Congress continue to work toward a debt-ceiling deal, it appears that opposition to defense cuts is dwindling, even among House Republicans. The Hill reported Thursday that “As few as 30 House Republicans would likely consider voting against a debt-ceiling deal that cuts $300 billion from security spending, according to a GOP aide.”

    In today’s Wall Street Journal, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld warns that making those cuts would be “a grievous mistake”:

    With no immediate outward signs of negligence, the political penalties for cutting weapons systems and delaying reinvestment in equipment and infrastructure are close to zero for those in office today. But the penalty for being ill-prepared tomorrow when the unforeseen occurs—whether another terrorist attack at home or a major crisis abroad—can be measured in American lives lost.”

    Rumsfeld notes that cutting defense now has repercussions down the road:

    Our country has taken an ax to our national security budget—both the Defense Department and the intelligence community—after every war of the 20th century. And every time we later regretted it. After years of grinding conflict, it can be easy to fall prey to the comfortable fiction that the ugly business of conflict is over and that the U.S. can reduce its military and intelligence capabilities. If we revert to the pennywise policies of the 1990s, we are certain to have to once again scramble to rebuild our defenses in the future.

    Given the state of the U.S. military, making those cuts is nothing we can afford. The Heritage Foundation President Ed Feulner writes that the military is already suffering from lack of funding, and that drastic cuts should not be on the table.

    Let’s not delude ourselves. The fact is, we’ve been living for a while now off past military buildups. But things wear out. Equipment breaks down, and it can be patched up only so many times before it’s unable to do the job it’s meant to do. It’s time to make airplanes that are younger than their pilots and ships that are younger than their commanders.

    Otherwise, we risk repeating cycles of the past. When we cut too deeply, as we did during President Carter’s time in office, we degrade our ability to defend ourselves.

    There’s a way to get spending under control without gutting defense — and The Heritage Foundation does it in its Saving the American Dream plan. That’s the course Congress and the White House should take in order to secure the United States’ fiscal health, as well as its national security.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Rumsfeld: Cutting Defense 'A Grievous Mistake'

    1. Randall says:

      The US spends more on military than the next top 10 countries combined. Are we at the point Eisenhower warned us about?

      In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

      I think we passed that point long ago. Makers of military equipment have a powerful interest (billions) to keep us in some sort of conflict so they can keep selling to the government. We absolutely need a strong military for defense. But we have troops in over 100 countries. That's not defense, that's offense. It's time to reign in some of that spending and military involvement in the affairs of other countries.

    2. hENRY says:

      It's been 50 years past due. Our military has spent trillions on other countries. Americans have lost lives, and many limbs to other countries. It's time to shut down all foreign bases and close all wars. Bring home our men and women. Rebuild our equipment and train our military on home soil. AMERICA IS BROKE AND GOVERNMENT WANTS TO TAKE EVERYTHING FROM OUR CITIZENS.

      Bring home all the tax free contractors on foreign soil. Shut down the money men of AMERICA.

    3. Forums4Justice says:

      Medicare/Medicaid Cost .vs Defense Spending http://bit.ly/eI86mm

      edicare|Medicaid | COST | Defense Spending ($ IN TRILLIONS)
      ………..Mcare..Mc aid..Total..Defense
      FY1999 .211 + .108 = $0.319 $0.261
      FY2000 .218 + .118 = $0.336 $0.281
      FY2001 .241 + .130 = $0.371 $0.291
      FY2002 .256 + .148 = $0.404 $0.332
      FY2003 .277 + .161 = $0.438 $0.389
      FY2004 .300 + .176 = $0.476 $0.437
      FY2005 .335 + .182 = $0.517 $0.474
      FY2006 .378 + .181 = $0.559 $0.499
      FY2007 .374 + .191 = $0.565 $0.529
      FY2008 .389 + .202 = $0.591 $0.595
      FY2009 .429 + .251 = $0.680 $0.637
      FY2010 .450 + .273 = $0.723 $0.677
      FY2011 .303 + .189 = $0.492 $0.448 8 mos http://1.usa.gov/9lB1xt

    4. Redfray says:

      If this was anyone but Rumsfeld saying this, I would think it had some velleity to it. Rumsfeld is a globalist with thoughts of himself over everyone else. Americans need to stop supporting the world, and start supporting ourselves. No one in any of the countries we support like us. Get out of there country and spend our money in America.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.