• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Kucinich Invites Foreign Intrigue with NATO War Crimes Letter

    Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) recently sent a letter to the United Nations and the International Criminal Court enjoining them to initiate an investigation of NATO and its military commanders for potential war crimes related to civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Libya.  Kucinich concluded his exhortation: “NATO has repeatedly and wantonly neglected to follow [international] law.  The United Nations…has no choice but to conduct an independent investigation of actions taken by NATO and to pursue prosecution where warranted.”

    The Representative from Ohio is misguided in his estimation that American commanders should subject themselves to a supranational inquiry.  To do so would be a fundamental abrogation of U.S. sovereignty.

    That Kucinich appealed to the ICC is curious, for the court holds no authority over American law or conduct.  Since Bill Clinton’s presidency, the United States has unequivocally refused to subject itself to ICC oversight, for such action would present a serious threat to U.S. sovereignty. The American people, as the nation’s collective sovereign, have submitted themselves to the purview of the Constitution as their land’s highest law.  Canadian law, French jurisprudence, or ICC injunctions cannot supersede this document in matters of American policy.

    Had Kucinich turned to the Constitution instead of international bodies, he would have encountered the Define and Punish Clause.   Should an international situation arise in which the U.S. military is in the wrong, the Constitution empowers the legislature “to define and punish…offenses against the law of nations.”  How does Congress do this?  The Constitution has another answer: the Military Regulation Clause, giving representatives and senators unequivocal authority “to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.”  Historically, such regulations have taken the form of military tribunals.  Reflected in both articles is the principle of self-government so central to the American regime.  The Founders did not wait for a foreign body to impose a rubric of international justice over them; they assumed the responsibility.  Never before has America abandoned her military leaders to the caprices of global institutions; such action, as Alexander Hamilton observed, would only invite foreign intrigue and compromise America’s security.

    Unfortunately for Americans, Rep. Kucinich’s understanding of security is very different from Hamilton’s.  When asked in 2003 why he had so much confidence in international bodies like the U.N., then-presidential candidate Kucinich responded: “The only way that we [can] be safe as a nation is to reach out and to engage with the world community in the cause of international security.”  In his second presidential campaign four years later, the congressman advocated cutting the defense budget by 25%.  By advocating such a rash export of political sovereignty, Kucinich betrays the very naivete and rosy idealism rejected in the Constitution.  Should Mr. Kucinich claim his legitimate authority to regulate in these matters, he would encounter a Constitution responsible enough to hold its military accountable, and find reason enough to strengthen it for the common defense.

    The author would like to thank Michael Sobolik who contributed to this blog as a member of the Young Leaders Program.

    Posted in First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Kucinich Invites Foreign Intrigue with NATO War Crimes Letter

    1. C Hitschler says:

      Wow — what is wrong with this guy? Is he an American citizen or not? The US has wisely held the ICC, long ago debunked as hostile to national sovereignty, at arm's length. Kucinich appears to be launching a new career as a shill for the Global Communitarians — or he's just got too much time on his hands. Congress should impeach him and ship him overseas so he can foul other ponds with his adversarial diplomacy. He's dangerous!

      • yani says:

        So, why our own president OBAMA ( Peace Nobel Award ?) is constantly bypassing our Congress and starting new wars base on UN resolution …is this American and Constitutional ??? You don't have to sweat to prove Congressman Dannis Kucinich patriotism, just check his record and don't primitively spin the truth and his intentions. Morons like you are the reason where America is today. Educate yourself !!!

        *****Happy Birthday America *****

    2. Chris Bieber says:

      the obliviousness and partisanship of the “conservative” movement…on par with its adulation, advocacy and enamoring of the MilIndComplex..is staggering.

      Conservative Robert Taft voted AGAINST NATO as it was unConstitutional and would put American Soldiers under foreign control…and duh…that is what is the REALITY. Warmongering Conservatives condoning/pushing war/bombing and unConstitutional Exec Branch and Congressional warmongering. HavingALLOWING the US Military service people under control of the UNITED NATIONS Article 54 Created and CONTROLLED!!! NATO(created and ran by European globalists and socialists) is horrible and treasonous… and flinging the crap back at BHO and broken clock(right 2x a day) Kucinich is so easy…but cmon look in the mirror “conservatives” and read the Constitution and the Declaration of War!!..maybe you’ll hold your “conservative” Represemtative(and yourselves?) accountable???? that’ll be the day….

    3. G. Moss says:

      Your use of the word "enjoin" is incorrect. Enjoin is a synonym of the word "injunction." I believe the author would have been better served by using the word "requesting."
      Kucinich serves as the perfect bookend to his anti-American counterpart at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. This is only a small preview of coming attractions if Obama were to win a second term.

      • Terry says:

        Use was fine:
        Enjoining – present participle of en·join (Verb):
        1. Instruct or urge (someone) to do something.
        [Merriam-Webster Dictionary]

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×