• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • CBO Report Shows, Without Reform, the Future of Medicare Ain’t Pretty

    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently released its annual Long-Term Budget Outlook, which highlights the effects of existing policy on the federal budget. The verdict: The current trajectory is “unsustainable.”

    Growing federal health care spending is a major driver of future deficits. As CBO explains, “Spending for health care in the United States has been growing faster than the economy for many years, posing a challenge not only for the federal government’s two major health insurance programs, Medicare and Medicaid, but also for state and local governments and the private sector.” The report shows that the outlook is grimmer than ever, despite the vaunted “deficit reduction” claims of those in Congress who voted for Obamacare.

    Obamacare means massive provider cuts and massive new spending. The new law relies on top-down cuts and an unelected board to make further cuts to the program to reduce its cost. Cutting health care providers’ reimbursements is the wrong way to reduce Medicare spending, since, as the Medicare Actuary has warned, it would threaten seniors’ access to care.

    In addition to enacting these failed policies, after passing Obamacare, Congress once again temporarily extended a “doc fix” to avoid a permanent solution to the existing Medicare physician payment mess. Lawmakers will likely continue to delay the cuts mandated by the formula governing Medicare physician payment (misleadingly dubbed the sustainable growth rate, or SGR), guaranteeing huge increases in federal spending above what is assumed under current law.

    CBO assumes many of the attempts to reduce Medicare spending, in addition to a continued “doc fix,” will lead spending in the program to exceed what is predicted under current law. It reports:

    Beyond the initial 10-year span, CBO assumed that three Medicare policies that might be difficult to sustain over a long period—further reductions in payment updates for most providers in the fee-for-service program, the sustainable growth rate mechanism for payment rates for physicians, and the IPAB—would not continue past 2021. Without those policies in place, CBO expects that excess cost growth will follow the path of underlying excess cost growth described above.

    Even if the cuts do occur, savings won’t be used to strengthen the program. Instead, as CBO explained in last year’s outlook, “…the majority of the HI [Hospital Insurance] trust fund savings achieved under the legislation through 2019 will be used to pay for other spending and therefore will not enhance the government’s underlying ability to pay for future Medicare benefits.”

    Medicare “as we know it” has an expiration date under current law. Liberals in Congress and their allies routinely accuse Representative Paul Ryan (R–WI) and congressional conservatives of trying to “end Medicare as we know it.” But as CBO confirms, the program is already on life support if left unreformed:

    According to CBO’s March 2011 baseline projections, the HI trust fund will be exhausted in 2020. Once the HI trust fund is exhausted, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will no longer have legal authority to pay health plans and providers. Annual outlays would therefore be limited to annual revenues. If payments to health plans and providers could be made only from annual revenues, which are inadequate to cover total costs, beneficiaries’ access to health care services could be reduced. Projections in this report incorporate an assumption that Medicare benefits would continue to be paid regardless of the financial status of the HI trust fund.

    We need real reform…now. Heritage budget expert Alison Fraser writes, “When someone has a serous illness and holds off on seeing a doctor, he or she only grows more ill and requires a more drastic and potentially painful cure. In the same way, so does delaying action on getting spending and the debt under control further weaken the economy, stifle job growth, and injure investor confidence.” To strengthen and preserve Medicare and to fix the health care system at large, real change is needed now.

    Heritage’s plan, Saving the American Dream, fixes Medicare by introducing “the powerful forces of consumer choice and competition.” Unlike Obamacare, these proposed reforms wouldn’t rely on a board of bureaucrats to lower costs. Instead, the free market would be employed to allow enrollees to receive better-value health benefits. Making Medicare sustainable is essential to reducing federal deficit spending. Unless policymakers enact real reform that lowers costs now, future generations will face fewer benefits and crushing taxes.

    Kyle Rusciano contributed to this post. He is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to CBO Report Shows, Without Reform, the Future of Medicare Ain’t Pretty

    1. carlos says:

      "Obamacare means massive provider cuts and massive new spending. The new law relies on top-down cuts and an unelected board to make further cuts to the program to reduce its cost. Cutting health care providers’ reimbursements is the wrong way to reduce Medicare spending, since, as the Medicare Actuary has warned, it would threaten seniors’ access to care."

      THIS IS INCORRECT AND REFLECTS THE AUTHOR'S BIAS. This country spends 2 to 3 times MORE in health care per GDP than any G20 country. Is our level of health care 2 to 3 times better than Germany, France, Canada? As someone who lived in Canada with great service, IT IS NOT. A reduction on the costs of health care and pharma, which in terminal diseases reach $500,000 or more per year, per patient, is unsustainable. Indeed, it not just pricing, but there is a reason drug companies charge 33 to 50% more in the USA than abywhere else! WHY? Because its allowed to…..without controls or oversight.

      Also, where was this author, who is so against OBAMACARE, why not include the issue to BUSHCARE and the inclusion of pharma drugs which was included in Medicare without ANY TAX INCREASE or reductions anywhere? The spending has been in the trillions…un funded! Why no BushCare issues in the 90's?
      And finally, we can even go back to 'TRUMANCARE" and discuss why Medicare for over 67 with all the benefits of insurance without lapses in coverage, denials, etc ? Why not debate the merits of this #3 spending pool in the Federal budget?
      Its easy having a job, healthy and with insurance in this country. Try to do it with a pre existing condition under 67 yo and at the mercy of the for profit insurance and medical industry in the USA……

      • Bobbie says:

        Carlos, please, I'm sorry but you have been convinced of a terrible lie. If you have been personally responsible for your health and it's expense throughout your life so far and regardless of your income, you will know all costs in the private sector doubled in the name of funding Obamacare. We're a household of 5, Carlos. We have 2 costly and chronic illnesses in the family. My husband is the provider who works non-union at an exerting, laboring job. We do not want government control between our health and our doctors. The government failed their duty in the oversight of insurance to allude you into thinking insurance co's. are evil. For your safety and health, you're better off making your own choices through the privacy of your doctor visits at your expense. Government holds no accountabilities and always looking for money. How could you hold trust in government service of health when they take their short cuts by government's ability to compromise the health of individuals. It's not a good idea, Carlos. Obamacare isn't intended to be in favor of those that have self respect and dignity to infringe upon no one and provide and carry out personal responsibilities. Independence! He wants to remove that! Obamacare is entrapment!

    2. tucanofulano says:

      Obama's "game plan" = wind up expanding Medicare to cover everyone, "womb to tomb" and increase Social Security taxes 500% on everyone "womb to tomb". The gambit = get "Obamacare" in front of the Supremes in order to get it declared unConstitutional (which it is) in order to create support/demand for his single-payor "Womb to Tomb" universal Medicare plan (which as executive He will control).

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×