• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission Won't Release Unredacted Yucca Documents

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is refusing to release an unredacted version of its safety evaluation reports on Yucca Mountain, leaving the conclusions unknown to the public.

    The agency notified Heritage that it had rejected an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act. The NRC’s decision comes eight months after Heritage first requested volumes II and III of the Yucca report in October. The NRC released more than 1,400 pages in February, but redacted the conclusions. Heritage appealed in March. (Full text of the letter is below.)

    The NRC’s reports on Yucca have emerged as a contentious issue on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers have charged that the Obama administration ignored scientific information in a quest to halt the nuclear-waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

    In denying Heritage’s appeal, the NRC maintained that releasing the redacted portions “could result in harm to the agency,” according to a letter from Darren B. Ash, deputy executive director for corporate management at the NRC. Ash wrote:

    It could prematurely disclose the preliminary views of the NRC staff before the NRC staff makes its final decision on whether the U.S. Department of Energy’s license application meets the NRC’s preclosure and postclosure requirements and it could inhibit the open and frank exchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. In addition, release could create confusion regarding the agency’s final decisions.

    Even though the NRC has refused to release the information publicly, the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology obtained a copy after repeated demands. Earlier this month the committee released a scathing report that documented how the Obama administration undermined U.S. nuclear waste policy by manipulating the process behind the Yucca Mountain decision.

    The committee’s report strongly suggested that political pressure from the Obama administration influenced the agency’s decision on Yucca:

    SER Volume III demonstrates in excruciating detail the level of technical support among NRC and Department of Energy (DOE) experts in favor of the site’s advancement. Overall, the NRC staff review concluded that DOE‘s Yucca Mountain License Application complies with applicable NRC safety requirements necessary for the site to proceed to licensing for construction.

    In addition to the dispute over the Yucca documents, NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko has also come under fire following a negative report on his actions by the agency’s inspector general. Jaczko previously worked for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), the chief opponent to the Yucca repository.

    Nuclear Regulatory Commission Denies Appeal for Unredacted Yucca Report

    Posted in Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Won't Release Unredacted Yucca Documents

    1. Bobbie says:

      Gosh! Nobody could be hiding anything, could they? Accountability NOW!

    2. Keith says:

      This is a classic example of Government waste, this facility should have been either completed or shutdown a long time ago. And all consumers of electricity continue to pay for this government boondoggle. This tax on consumers will likely end up in the same situation with the tax on telephone service that was supposed to fund the Spanish-American war and that tax was finally rescinded after 100 years or so. See past USA article http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/telecom/….

      The recent nuclear situation in Japan also shows the folly in storing spent fuel rods at the generating plant, so these bozos in Washington think it is wise to continue storing fuel rods all over the country rather than complete and open this facility.

    3. James Raleigh says:

      Folks,

      Congressional subcommittees have the full, unredacted version of the NRC’s Safety Evaluation Report. The recent subcommittee hearing discuss the NRC’s findings in some detail.

      People need to read the findings presented in the recent Space, Science, and Technology subcommittee report. It reveals the NRC’s safety determination in SER Volume 3, finding that the Yucca Mountain Project License Application meets the regulatory requirements for going forward with a Construction Permit. The committee’s findings also reveal not just a pattern, but a systematic and active effort on the part of the Administration to obfuscate, delay, and muzzle scientific and technical information and related processes in order to shut down Yucca Mountain.

    4. James Raleigh says:

      Folks,

      Congressional subcommittees have the full, unredacted version of the NRC’s Safety Evaluation Report. The recent subcommittee hearing discuss the NRC’s findings in some detail.

      People need to read the findings presented in the recent Space, Science, and Technology subcommittee report. It reveals the NRC’s safety determination in SER Volume 3, finding that the Yucca Mountain Project License Application meets the regulatory requirements for going forward with a Construction Permit. The committee’s findings also reveal not just a pattern, but a systematic and active effort on the part of the Administration to obfuscate, delay, and muzzle scientific and technical information and related processes in order to shut down Yucca Mountain.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×