• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Resisting Temptation Over Libya

    It’s tempting to cut off funds immediately for President Obama’s ill-conceived Libya offensive.  But it’s not the right course.  For the sake of our allies, Congress needs to be patient in using the power of the purse to correct Obama’s misadventure.

    Even if the ongoing air attacks chased Muammar Qadhafi from power, he might be replaced by a radical Islamist regime.  We have no good intelligence on what the rebels would establish if they took over.

    Obama’s ham-handed approach has been an insult to the constitutional role of Congress in defining and punishing offenses against the law of nations, as specified in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.  Obama failed to make any meaningful consultation with Congress before he committed American forces, much less obtain any type of actual approval from Congress.

    Yes, it’s tempting for Congress to “teach him a lesson” by voting to cut off U.S. funding immediately for Libyan operations.  The power of the purse is Congress’ strongest counter-balance to the President’s role as commander-in-chief.

    But the countervailing argument is that our NATO allies—a key component of America’s national security—have been pulled into the Libya fray based on assurances and urgings from the Obama Administration.  Those may have been improvident, but they are real.

    A precipitous exit from America’s role in Operation Unified Protector would pull the rug out from under our allies, making it less likely they would ever be willing to stand with America in the future when we have real need for their help.

    Nations conducting the air strikes have included Great Britain, France, Canada, Norway, Denmark and Belgium while other military support has come from Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and Turkey, according to the BBC’s tallies.  Others, like Germany, have refused to participate in an unclear mission.

    The current NATO operation expires in September; Congress should stick with our allies until then, even as it asserts itself to make sure there is no further extension or expansion of the mission.

    Meantime, other efforts such as arms and financial embargoes could be pursued.

    It’s an uncomfortable fact that sending a message of solidarity with our NATO allies is more important than sending a message to President Obama.

    Already, the House formally rebuked President Obama on June 3rd with a 268-145 bipartisan vote on a resolution that included a declaration that, “The President has failed to provide Congress with a compelling rationale based upon United States national security interests for current United States military activities regarding Libya.”

    The bipartisan war of words against Obama’s mistaken course will take a toll on him.  The lawsuit by some in Congress will be just a sideshow; the courts cannot be expected to be involved in this dispute over the President’s war powers, nor should they be.

    It’s sad but true that the President has committed our forces and our funds unwisely.  But Congress should resist the temptation to make it worse by abandoning our allies who followed us into the skies over Libya.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Resisting Temptation Over Libya

    1. Buffalo Chips says:

      What's amazing is that I cannot find proof that the administration has included Libya as a Combat Zone. If anyone can verify this please post an answer. If it isn't considered a combat zonet by the administration is showing a lack of respect toward those who put themselves in harms way.

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      What happened to the letter Boehner sent to Obama? Any reply yet, or is the letter still hanging in the tolit stall awaiting Obama final usage. The Repbs will do nothing but talk. Meantime, we should ask, would our "allies" stay in Libya against the overwhelming decent of their people, if it was only the U.S. interest at stake. Remember, Europe gets all but about 3% of all Lybian oil. That 3% come here. It is not in our best interest to spend hundreds of millions of our tax dollars just to protect our "allies" oil.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.