• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Nuclear Weapons Testing Remains Necessary

    Despite the Clinton Administration’s failed efforts to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1999, the Obama Administration believes the time is right for another attempt in the U.S. Senate, writes Heritage analyst Peter Brookes. Such optimism overlooks the realities of the current strategic environment, in which numerous states such as North Korea and Iran are either seeking nuclear weapons or expanding their arsenals.

    Furthering the White House’s CTBT optimism is the ratification of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty last December. According to Ellen Tauscher, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, “The New START debate, in many ways, opened the door for the CTBT.” The reality, however, is that the problems that derailed CTBT more than a decade ago remain present and in many cases have grown worse.

    The most significant concern is the atrophy of the U.S. nuclear weapons complex since the end of the Cold War. The Administration’s recent efforts to increase funding for the National Nuclear Security Administration are not enough to modernize the outdated arsenal.

    The CTBT suffers from other problems as well. These include ambiguity regarding a definition of what actually constitutes a nuclear weapons test and problems with verification. The U.S. interpretation of a nuclear weapons test is that the treaty bans all explosive nuclear testing. Yet Russia and China do not share this view and claim that low-yield nuclear weapons tests, which both countries likely still conduct, do not constitute a violation of the treaty. In addition, it is impossible to monitor low-yield nuclear weapons tests or underground detonations—rendering any zero-yield ban unverifiable.

    Finally, a credible nuclear deterrent rests on America’s confidence to deploy nuclear weapons and the world’s perception that these weapons will do exactly what they are supposed to do once the U.S. leadership needs them. The CTBT would impede the U.S.’s ability to modernize its nuclear weapons stockpile or adapt existing warheads for new missions. This comes at a time when Russia and China are actively modernizing their nuclear forces.

    Nuclear weapons testing is essential for keeping the U.S. stockpile safe, secure, and reliable in the years ahead. Ratifying the CTBT would be detrimental to U.S. national security interests, as 30 countries around the world rely on the credibility of U.S. extended deterrence. These countries would be incentivized to develop their own nuclear weapons capabilities if the United States were perceived as weak and its nuclear weapons unreliable.

    Jake Wilson is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Nuclear Weapons Testing Remains Necessary

    1. Robert, Edmonton Alb says:

      Great article expressing the need to promote a robust nuclear deterrent. We need to leave the world no doubt that the US intends to maintain and modernize the Triad and nuclear enterprise in the defense of this great nation.

    2. Kirk says:

      Old talking points. What does Iram have to do with this anyway? Iran is bound by the NPT, and the CTBT does not affect them. Why can't you people realize that CTBT locks in the strategic advantage the US has?

    3. Bob Farquhar says:

      Nuclear weapons are relics of the Cold War, serve no rational purpose, and need to be systematically eliminated. The CTBT needs ratification.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.