• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama's Green Policies Will Turn the Lights Out on Job Creation

    Yesterday, President Obama met with his Jobs and Competitiveness Council and delivered remarks at Cree, a lighting manufacturing facility in Durham, North Carolina. He discussed the importance of the “clean energy revolution” that will help jumpstart the economy. But the green energy policies President Obama has been advertising are anti-job creation and anti-competitiveness more than anything. Here’s why.

    President Obama liberally uses the word investments when he talks about government funding for green technologies, and when he does, he commits the “free lunch” fallacy that plagues our politicians who believe we can use taxpayer funds to spend our way to an economic recovery.

    Government spending will create some jobs to build whatever politicians want us to build, but this diverts labor, capital, and materials from the private sector that could be used more efficiently to create even more jobs. The net effect is that subsidized green jobs destroy jobs elsewhere in the economy.

    And the reason companies need the subsidies, loan guarantees, tax credits, mandates, and preferential regulatory treatment is that they’re not competitive without them. Even with the subsidies, some of these green firms are struggling to stay afloat. My colleague David Kreutzer recently testified on the issue of green jobs, noting that three of the four loan guarantee projects Obama labeled as success stories are not so successful:

    The first, Solyndra, received a loan guarantee for $535 million in the fall of 2009. In the spring of 2010, it failed to complete its initial public offering after an independent audit questioned the ongoing viability of the firm. Then, in the fall of 2010, the firm closed one of its manufacturing facilities and laid off 180 workers.

    The second, Beacon Power, received a $43 million loan guarantee in July of 2009. Since then, its stock price has dropped by half—a period during which the Dow-Jones Industrial Average has increased over 40 percent.

    The third, First Wind Holdings, received a $117 million loan guarantee in March of 2010 but withdrew its initial public offering in October of 2010.

    The fourth, Nevada Geothermal Power’s Blue Mountain geothermal project, appears on track. Nevada Geothermal has entered into a 20-year power purchase agreement with the Nevada utility NV Power.

    This brings us back to Cree, the manufacturing facility that produces light emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs are one of the government-approved technologies that stand to benefit from the lighting standards enacted in 2007 that will phase out the incandescent bulb. Cree was an obvious choice for President Obama’s visit and speech for two reasons.

    First, Tim Carney at The Washington Examiner points out that “Cree has received more than $78 million in federal grants, according to USASpending.gov, and more than $96 million in federal contracts.” Second, as a result of the lighting standards, lighting manufacturing facilities in Niles, Ohio; Winchester, Virginia; and Lexington, Kentucky; don’t exist anymore. So those options were out.

    The process of job creation and job destruction is not necessarily a bad thing; it’s the businesses that innovate and produce goods that consumers value that make America’s economic engine run. But the government light bulb ban is unnecessarily killing jobs by manipulating the market while government handouts are artificially propping up other businesses.

    In fact, Cree’s quarterly report essentially states that the restoration of consumer choice could result in reduced sales: “These constraints may be eliminated or delayed by legislative action, which could have a negative impact on demand for our products.”

    LEDs (or compact fluorescents or halogen builds) may be a better choice than incandescent bulbs, but consumers can make intelligent decisions on their own without the government taking away their freedom to choose. Right now, consumers prefer incandescent bulbs because they’re cheaper, and they enjoy the light they give off as opposed to other light bulbs.

    Some are realizing that energy efficiency isn’t as great as the government initially purported. And just as fuel-efficiency standards for automobiles incentivize consumers to drive more, if energy-efficient bulbs are saving households money, won’t they leave the lights on longer?

    Green jobs policies and lighting standards are policies driven by a mix of special interest politics and concern that energy use in the U.S. is producing too much carbon dioxide. They won’t provide the economic stimulus America needs and are a waste of valuable resources.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Obama's Green Policies Will Turn the Lights Out on Job Creation

    1. Pingback: What the mainstream media should be covering | The Daily Caller

    2. Nick Panchev says:

      Actual $ is at $63 B, not $80B, or $42B or all other variations as stated therein several post, exhibited herein below.

      WHEREFORE, the max. of 4,500 permanent jobs padded by $63B = $14 million per job.

      This is what DOE says:
      http://blog.energy.gov/blog/2011/06/14/concentrat

      What others has posted:

      Attn: Eric Wesoff

      RE: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/2-bil

      “……….62,350 jobs”

      DOE, Prove it! [Saving or creating jobs implies permanent jobs, not a job for up to 28 moth] [Emphasis added]

      At-Issue: LUZ III near Nevada border will only create up to 363 permanent jobs. – - DITTO- – for the rest.

      (At best max. 4500 permanent jobs.)

      Other Factor: Most of the collectors and receivers are made in Europe and China. In fact already pre-assembled and then shipped to the US Mojave Desert. (BNSF railroad boys are getting reacher, they locomotives are diesel fired, (burning tons of fossil fuel – - good old Oil Boys, jack pot again) delivering renewable energy systems from oversee.)

      For other corrective, see herein below.

      RE :http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/6188944

      “The assembly was originally developed……..(by who ?)…. in connection with financial assistance from DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.”

      “Abengoa’s project will be the first US-based, utility-scale deployment of the company’s latest “Solar Collector Assembly…..”

      Incorrect.

      Talk wit LUZ, and with the other innovators of proprietary technology. [Emphasis added]

      See herein below, FYI

      ————Original Message————

      Subject: A post by Cassandra Sweet, is not correct. Corrective sought

      From:

      Date: Tue, June 14, 2011 4:04 pm

      To: irena.briganti@foxnews.com

      RE: http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2011/06/14/

      At-Issue

      WHEREAS, NextExtra Energy does not have patent nor own proprietary technology, as stated therein said post.

      (1) The Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) solar-thermal, single parabolic trough collectors (mirrors) with single tube receiver is the proprietary tech of LUZ II (Mr. Goldberg), [The original solar motor was invented in 1860 by Mr. Moushot].

      LUZ II also hold the flat mirror power tower with water tank on top. [Original power tower with Molten salt tank was implemented by several entity and the US DOE.]

      (2) Next CSP solar system is Sterling, and is not by NextExtra Energy.

      (3) Next CSP solar-thermal system is by the Australian entrepreneurs from AUSRA and again is not by NextExtra Energy.

      (4) The final CSP solar-thermal Twin Parabolic Trough (mirrors) collectors with Twin Inverted Parabolic Receivers, is by Nick and Peter Panchev.

      There are two systems for Storage Component: One is dual tanks wit one HTF and the other is triple tanks with dual HTF by Nick and Peter Panchev and again it is not by NextExrea Energy.

      WHEREFORE, if Ciassandra Sweet does not make correctives, per the herein above clarified, her post will be legally construed , under conspiracy theory, as co-conspiracy act.

      There are several other “copy cats’, as well and USPTO and DOJ are aware of.

      Thirty days to correct these issues at said post shall be deemed as a reasonable time and absent of correctives, will result in a Restraining Order, filed in the Federal District Court.

      Notified by,

      Nick Panchev

      cc: Mr. Watson, Esq.

    3. Mgreczyn says:

      One wonders how many clean energy jobs have been destroyed by 80 years of fossi fuel subsidies.

    4. Pingback: The Barack Obama Theory of Job Creation: Don’t Listen, Just Preach. « American Elephants

    5. Pingback: PA Pundits - International

    6. DONNIE CLAYTON BARBE says:

      AMERICA IS ONE NATION UNDER GOD. I'M JUST A OLD MAN WHAT I SAY DON'T MEAN MUCH TO ANYONE. I HAD TO LIVE AT MY HOME FOR OVER 30 YEARS WITH NO HELP FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT OR ANYONE ELSE.AND I KNOW OTHERS THAT HAD NO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND LIVED IN THE SAME. ITS BEEN REPORTED THAT WE LIVE IN A GODLESS AMERICA,BECAUSE OF THE LEADERS AND FEDS. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RIGHTS OF THE FIRST AMERICANS? THANK YOU.

    7. Pingback: Morning Bell: A Showdown over the War in Libya | The Foundry

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×