• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Guest Blog: Georgians Will Continue to Fight for School Choice Options

    Better than 97 percent proficient in reading, 94 percent proficient in math, and a perfect 100 percent in writing: These are the most recent criterion-referenced competency test and 8th grade writing assessment scores for Ivy Preparatory Charter School located in Gwinnett County, a suburb of Atlanta. In a state where K–12 education results are not often highlighted, one would think such scores would be a cause for celebration. Think again.

    Instead, other Georgia schools are trying to shut down Ivy Prep.

    Public charter schools have become a successful part of the educational freedom movement. In some states, charter schools are a welcome addition. Not so in Georgia. Until recently, Georgia law had  allowed a charter school to exist only if the local school system authorized it. As you might suspect, such an approval mechanism results in little freedom. The rare charter schools that have been created are often just an extension of the local system—perhaps slightly better, but not the groundbreaking movement we need in education. The approval system was so bad that in 2007, 28 charter school applications were submitted to local school systems throughout Georgia, but only two were approved.

    So in 2008, the legislature fixed the obvious problem by creating a state commission where charter applicants turned down by local school boards could potentially be granted a state charter.

    Ivy Prep was one of the first schools to receive a state charter. It has a 94 percent minority student population and receives about 75 percent of the typical funding of its neighboring schools in Gwinnett County. Despite receiving considerably less money, the educational results of Ivy Prep students have been nothing short of spectacular. Less money, better results—it’s exactly what educational freedom advocates have claimed would happen if students are given choice and the chains of government control are lifted. But, as predictable as the sun rising in the East, you know what happened next.

    When any group dares to escape the clutches of a one-size-fits-all government-run education system, the bureaucracy kicks into gear. The playbook is simple: First, attempt to scare lawmakers, and if that doesn’t work… sue, sue, sue. This is exactly what happened.

    Gwinnett County Schools and other public systems immediately filed suit to try and put an end to this success story. The legal claim was money—essentially, they didn’t want local tax dollars to follow the child if a student dared leave their precious system and attend a public charter school. It is important to realize that while money may sometimes be the stated opposition to educational freedom, make no mistake, control is at the core.

    As the legal case made its way through the Georgia courts, the primary issue became whether the state could even create “state-chartered” schools. The suggestion that the state, which already creates all local systems, could be prohibited from creating “state-chartered” schools sounds like a farce, but that is exactly what the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in a 4–3 decision overturning a state court judge’s ruling.

    The original argument of Gwinnett County Schools and others was that the state schools should not be allowed to fund a student’s education through the use of both state and local tax dollars. The Georgia Supreme Court ruling went much further, stating that local school systems have “exclusive” authority in public education, and the state has no authority to create public schools.

    If one follows the majority’s irrational opinion to its ultimate conclusion, then the state legislature, the state school board, and even the state school superintendent are essentially prohibited from all public policy in K–12 education. The majority justices must also ignore the fact that local boards of education are not even mentioned in the Georgia Constitution until 1945.

    Lawmakers, parents, and students will continue this fight when the General Assembly returns to session. A constitutional amendment will be offered to correct the flawed court decision. In the meantime, let’s hope the bright children of Ivy Prep don’t get discouraged by the mindless decisions of adults, especially those wearing black robes.

    Senator Chip Rogers (R) is Majority Leader of the Georgia State Senate.

    The views expressed by guest bloggers on the Foundry do not necessarily reflect the views of The Heritage Foundation.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Guest Blog: Georgians Will Continue to Fight for School Choice Options

    1. George Colgrove, VA says:

      This is positive – more and more states are calling for the same thing – school choice (i.e. competition!) This is happening at the right level – the states. Unfortunately, the self-serving federal workforce knows that this is a direct attack on their personal livelihoods. They are fighting this tooth and nail. Education is not a government program. It is a consumer based enterprise. Though I am side by side with Ben Franklin in the belief that education is a public investment, that does not mean the brick and morter needs to be. I am all in favor of the collection of LOCAL taxes – administered LOCALLY (i.e. towns and city level) to be applied as vouchers to any school a parent sees fit for thier child. This is a minimum payment to be applied equally to all parents. If a parent wants to send their child to a more expensive school, they will do so with additinal out of pocket cash.

      This does not require one federal worker to be part of.

    2. Charles Funk, Columb says:

      Tragic and outrageous! Unfortunately, the article is absolutely right: the issue is control. The entrenched educrats, mostly liberals and democrats, will put forward any lame and transparent excuse necessary to give cover for their self-aggrandizing and lucrative monopoly.

    3. Steve Adams says:

      If the facts are as related in article by Mr. Rogers, why not mount a voter turnout sufficient to oust the school board members and state representatives and deal with the problem in a straight forward fashion.

    4. Perry OK says:

      My wife is from GA,she is also one of the few people I know in this world who has both Common Sense as well as a well rounded education. That being said it is a.shame that the school system is. unions, have so much to fear from success. When our company makes more with less we pass out bonuses and award the ideas!

      So let's keep dumbing down our children to the pathetic level of there civil servant teachers who only want structure thru communism I mean unions!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×