• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Will Panetta Make Sure Washington Provides for the Common Defense?

    As the Secretary of Defense nominee Leon Panetta has his nomination hearing today, the American Enterprise Institute, the Foreign Policy Initiative, and The Heritage Foundation published a list of important questions that Congress should ask prior to Panetta’s confirmation.

    As Panetta was a chief architect of the defense budget drawdown in the 1990s, Congress should make sure that the U.S. interests at home and abroad will remain protected and that the government will “provide for the common defense.”

    The baseline defense budget is now 3.5 percent of America’s GDP, a figure well below the post–World War II average of 7.5 percent. Mr. Panetta will be required to execute President Obama’s deficit reduction plan, which calls for $400 billion in cuts to national security spending over the next 12 years. This would put the GDP percentage of the defense budget at its lowest in the entire post–World War II era.

    President Obama’s plan to cut defense spending reflects his misplaced priorities as entitlements, not the defense spending, are a cause of the country’s fiscal woes. The proper question for Congress to ask Panetta would be: “Should defense be given higher priority than other areas of federal spending?”

    America’s military is a pillar underpinning the current world order, the most beneficial to the largest number of people in the history of mankind. Undermining America’s strength might have many unintended and unfortunate consequences not only for the United States but also for its allies all over the world.

    The decrease in funding for modernization of the U.S. military is an additional reason for concern. Today, due to the high operational tempo—a result of the military deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq—the equipment attrition level is much higher than what the procurement planners originally projected. “How is the modernization challenge to be addressed with a defense budget that is flat or declining?” should be a question for Congress to ask. If the cuts in the defense budget will require cuts in the manpower, Congress should be interested in what places Panetta would recommend that we forgo and what “things” he would recommend that the American military stop doing.

    Congress, in fulfilling its due diligence duty, should find out answers to these questions prior to considering Panetta to lead the Department of Defense.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Will Panetta Make Sure Washington Provides for the Common Defense?

    1. George Colgrove, VA says:

      I would not bet on it. But if the conservative house of representatives keeps a sharp eye – we may have a chance.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.