• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why Is Congress Putting Pork First on Homeland Security?

    The fiscal year (FY) 2012 homeland security appropriations bill is on the floor today. One would assume that this would be an opportunity for House members to get rid of wasteful programs while maintaining funding for the ones that make us safer.

    Instead, they are avoiding the hard choices that come with reallocating resources in a smart way, instead offering a simple amendment that would cut appropriations to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by 10 percent (except border security funding).

    This is a mistake for a number of reasons. First, there are legitimate programs and offices, such as the DHS Office of Policy, that are doing good work and actually need funding. Cutting them further would jeopardize their ability to perform their vital functions.

    Second, despite the amendment to cut funding across the board, the House approved an amendment last night that would double the amount for fire assistance grants. My colleague Dave Muhlhausen has examined these fire grants extensively and found that they aren’t effective at keeping firefighters safer. But Congress doesn’t seem to care and is more intent on preserving pet projects than on exercising fiscal responsibility—attempting to look good on spending while really just playing the same old money games.

    Congress can do this the right way. They did it, for instance, in the FY 2011 appropriations process, when Congress maintained key funding in a number of areas while cutting funding for the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI). This caused DHS to reassess the funding allocations for UASI, ensuring that only the highest-risk cities received precious resources.

    These spending shenanigans simply shouldn’t pass muster ever—but certainly not in this era of limited resources. Putting pork first isn’t a new problem for Congress. But it needs to stop now.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Why Is Congress Putting Pork First on Homeland Security?

    1. Bobbie says:

      Priorities not pork! Keep what's effective and efficient and improve efficiencies where it can be. Pork is life threatening in America's diet! Be consciously aware at all times and puck the pork!

      How many security departments that reflect the homeland do we have?

    2. George Colgrove, VA says:

      BAU – business as usual. Time to start finding replacements. These guys just do not get it!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×