- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
VIDEO: No Transparency on Obama’s Political Donations Executive Order
Posted By Mike Brownfield On May 16, 2011 @ 12:55 pm In Rule of Law,The Morning Bell | 19 Comments
How’s this for transparency in the White House?
Last week, the House joint Oversight and Small Business Committee held a hearing  on a proposed Obama Executive Order  mandating the disclosure of political donations by government contractors. The Committee questioned White House aide Daniel Gordon on the Order. His response? He danced, dodged, bobbed and weaved around the Committee’s questions, as captured in this video, above:
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC): Does it strike you at all as being ironic to invoke confidentiality and not answering questions when we’re having a hearing about transparency?”
Gordon: “It does not, sir. I think there are discussions, even about transparency and developing rules about transparency that we need to be able to have quietly and behind closed doors.”
This wasn’t the first time the White House has faced questions on the Order, which amounts to an attempt to make an end-run around Congress in order to implement restrictions on political speech. Twenty-seven senators  sent a letter  to the president questioning the Order in late April.
The Heritage Foundation’s Hans von Spakovsky explained in The Washington Examiner  the effect — and intent — of the president’s Order.
It would require any company bidding on a government contract to disclose all political contributions made in the two years before the bid by the company, its affiliates and subsidiaries, and any of its directors or officers …
It would require government contractors to disclose any contributions they make to third-party organizations “with the intention or reasonable expectation” that the funds will be used to make “independent expenditures or electioneering communications.”
The order wouldn’t apply to federal employee unions or many nonprofits that receive federal grants and, as von Spakovsky writes :
What is really going on here is a transparent attempt to introduce political gamesmanship into the government contracting business by the Obama administration. It is a cynical attempt to use the guise of reform to achieve political goals at the cost of the liberty that all Americans have to participate in the political process, and to voice their political opinions, without fear of retribution to themselves and their businesses.
So while the White House’s intentions are transparent, the decisions surrounding the Order are not. But don’t be surprised. On everything ranging from health care , net neutrality , the New START treaty  and closed-door meetings  with liberal organizations, the Obama Administration has thumbed its nose at transparency, despite the president’s commitment  to make his administration the most open and transparent in history.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/16/video-no-transparency-on-obamas-political-donations-executive-order/
URLs in this post:
 hearing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qW3OWniRy0
 proposed Obama Executive Order: http://www.foundry.org/2011/04/29/is-obama-circumventing-congress-to-restrict-political-speech/
 Twenty-seven senators: http://www.foundry.org/2011/04/28/senators-ask-white-house-to-abandon-executive-order-limiting-political-speech/
 letter: http://www.foundry.org/wp-content/uploads/Draft-EO-Govt-Contr-Disclosure-McConnell-letter.pdf
 explained in The Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/04/disclose-executive-order-would-politicize-federal-contracting#ixzz1Kw9niLHc
 as von Spakovsky writes: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2011/04/disclose-executive-order-would-politicize-federal-contracting#ixzz1KwFPRKKc
 health care: http://www.foundry.org/2010/01/05/morning-bell-a-sham-of-a-process-for-a-sham-of-a-bill/
 net neutrality: http://www.foundry.org/2010/12/20/fcc-and-net-neutrality-what-ever-happened-to-transparency/
 New START treaty: http://www.foundry.org/2010/12/16/morning-bell-release-the-start-negotiating-record/
 closed-door meetings: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/19/AR2010121903537.html
 president’s commitment: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/change_has_come_to_whitehouse-gov/
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.