• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • On Education, Obama Says One Thing But Does Another

    Earlier today, President Obama delivered a commencement speech to students graduating from Booker T. Washington High School in Memphis, Tennessee. Booker T. Washington high school won the president’s Race to the Top Commencement Challenge, designed to have high schools demonstrate their commitment to college readiness as part of a competition to have President Obama speak during their graduation ceremony. The school was chosen because of performance gains and increases in graduation rates.

    President Obama spoke to the graduates about the value of hard work and the importance of education. But he also took the time to note his administration’s strategy toward improving education:

    Ever since I became President, my administration has been working hard to make sure that we build on the progress that’s taking place at schools like this. We’ve got to encourage the kind of change that’s led not by Washington, D.C., but by teachers and principals and parents; by entire communities; by ordinary people standing up and demanding a better future for their children. We have more work to do so that every child can fulfill his or her God-given potential. And here Tennessee has been a leader, one of the first winners of the nationwide ‘Race to the Top’ we’ve launched to reward the kind of results you’re getting at BTW.”

    Despite his assertion that education change must be led “by teachers and principals and parents” – not by Washington, D.C. – the Obama administration’s track record on education policy begs the contrary. His administration has continued the education spending spree, taking it to new heights thanks to a $100 billion bonus provided to the Department of Education through the so-called “stimulus” in 2009.

    Moreover, the president is eager to consolidate more power in Washington by requiring states to comply with national standards as a part of No Child Left Behind reauthorization, driven by the belief that education reform can happen top-down from Washington. President Obama has called for the law’s reauthorization before the start of the next school year.

    For nearly a half-century now, the federal role in education has continued to grow, without any commensurate gains in academic achievement or attainment. But the Obama administration still believes that, by tinkering around the edges and reauthorizing NCLB, that this time, they can get it right.

    But thankfully, there is a chorus of strong conservative voices in Congress determined to restore educational decision-making authority back to the state and local level, and stop the education spending spree.

    Representative John Kline (R-MN), Chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, is determined to reduce the federal footprint in education, provide fiscal restraint over education spending, and streamline the Department of Education. And just last Friday, the first step toward these goals was taken.

    Representative Duncan Hunter Jr. (R-CA), chairman of the Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education Subcommittee, introduced a measure to curtail the proliferation of federal education programs and introduced what will be the first in a series of education reform bills being crafted by the House Education and the Workforce Committee. The Setting New Priorities in Education Spending Act would eliminate 43 out of some 80 programs that fall under No Child Left Behind. Hunter stated:

    It’s time to trim the fat. Today I will introduce legislation that will eliminate-not consolidate, not defund, but eliminate-43 wasteful K-12 education programs. At a time when approximately one-third of American fourth graders can’t read, we must concentrate on education initiatives that have a track record of putting the needs of students first.”

    As the fight of No Child Left Behind reauthorization heats up, federal policymakers have two options: they can continue to repeat the failed policies of the past by trying to dictate education reform from Washington, or they can take steps to reduce the federal footprint and tack a new course. If President Obama is serious about locally-driven education reform, he should follow the lead of conservative in Congress, who are working to ensure that taxpayer dollars are wisely used and education is serving its most important constituencies-students, parents, and taxpayers-not bureaucrats in Washington.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to On Education, Obama Says One Thing But Does Another

    1. Robyn L Hobbs, Hamil says:

      The Department of Education is unconstitutional,thus the sooner it is de-funded and eliminated as an entity, the better off our educational system will be. We support any and all measures that will accomplish this.

    2. Pingback: The Morning Links (5/17) | From the Desk of Lady Liberty

    3. Pingback: Must Know Headlines — ExposeTheMedia.com

    4. Jane Hamman says:

      Apt title. On EVERYTHING Obama says one thing but does another. That's his modus operandi: Fool most of the people most of the time. Unfortunately, he's succeeding.

    5. Pingback: Morning Bell: Teaching Obama a Lesson on Education | The Foundry

    6. Mary Smay Wentzville says:

      It's comforting to see that the Dept. of Education wasteful, redundant

      programs will finally be stopped. Education in the US, until the 1930's

      was excellent. Then the Deliberate Dumbing Down of America began'

      in ernest (check out the book of the same name by Charlotte Iserbyt)

      with those who would destroy our ed. system, Dewey, the progressives

      funded by Rockefeller and Carnegie Fdns; and ultimately destroy our

      country. At this writing, George Soros is another "fly in the ointment"

      hopeful of bringing down the US and with the help of H.Clinton and

      B.Obama, turn the US over to the UN and the new world order, one

      world gov't. Our dear country is being assulted on all sides by traitors, under the guise of "helping the poor" and spreading the wealth around.

      Never in the history of our country have we been attacked by so many

      smiling traitors.

      We need strong, bold and aggressive leaders; are there any on the

      horizon who are equipped to best with this man in the White House?

      and to match him word for word and issue by issue? He's feeling very

      smug as we are strapped by political correctness and fear, fear of

      offending anyone, which is ludicrious. The liberal press will make a

      sham of the 2012 election unless a way is found to harness the toxic

      "mouths" of these traitors. God help America — it seems no one else

      can ! Oh yes, by all means, we must always be civil — regardless.

    7. Phil Mass. says:

      And the brainwashing continues.

    8. Lisa, Massachusetts says:

      We must educate our children, without financially burdening the taxpayers of the children. Programs that are infeasible or non-producers must go. When children cannot read at a fourth grade level, changes are needed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.