• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • RSC Budget Balances the Budget through Spending Restraint

    The Republican Study Committee (RSC) has released a 10-year budget blueprint that reins in federal spending, balances the budget, and modernizes the federal budget process. While President Obama’s budget would bury the nation in $9.5 trillion of additional debt over the next decade, the RSC would accumulate just $1.8 trillion of debt over the next eight years before balancing the budget in 2020. And they accomplish this without raising taxes.

    Much of the RSC budget builds on the bold plan offered by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI). Both plans create a Medicare premium support system built on choice, competition, and transparency, thus averting program bankruptcy. Both turn Medicaid into block grants to the states. Both plans also repeal Obamacare, fund defense at the President’s level, and support revenue-neutral tax reform that lowers tax rates and broadens the tax base.

    The RSC plan goes beyond the Ryan plan in a few areas. The RSC plan implements Medicare premium support reforms sooner by providing an opt-in in 2017. It provides a smaller Medicaid block grant than the Ryan proposal, cuts more deeply into other mandatory spending like farm subsidies, and cuts domestic discretionary spending more sharply. The RSC would also gradually increase the Social Security eligibility age. Overall, the RSC would spend $9 trillion less than is indicated by the Congressional Budget Office’s 10-year baseline.

    Like the Ryan plan, the RSC plan requires a two-thirds supermajority vote to bypass its budget rules. These reforms will provide a budget process more in line with America’s budget priorities.

    The RSC budget could be improved by addressing Social Security more aggressively. Also, capping the explosive growth of anti-poverty spending (such as the plan authored by Representative Jim Jordan [R-OH]) would help Washington design a more rational welfare system. The substantial proposed reductions in total domestic discretionary spending are impressive, but are otherwise difficult to assess without more details about where the cuts would fall.

    Overall, the RSC budget provides yet another strong contrast to President Obama’s timid budget of rising spending, soaring debt, and higher taxes. While the President’s budget would continue running trillion-dollar deficits even during the (assumed) peace and prosperity at the end of this decade, the RSC proposal actually balances the budget. It reforms taxes and returns spending to pre-recession levels. Like the Ryan plan, the RSC budget starkly refutes those who claim that controlling deficits without tax increases is impossible or that rising government spending and deficits are inevitable.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to RSC Budget Balances the Budget through Spending Restraint

    1. George Colgrove VA says:

      "[T]he RSC would accumulate just $1.8 trillion of debt over the next eight years before balancing the budget in 2020."

      Not good enough. We should be focusing on NO MORE DEBT!

    2. Bobbie says:

      Democrats need discipline! Steve Warhos is mine and my great aunts favorite example of strength, endurance, courage and excellent character. He's motivational and puts people on the spot to admit their errors. He gets them to understand where their errors are. He knows the difference between right and wrong and fairness. He builds the strength of those so weak. He respects people and gives them the decency to do it for themselves. All that democrats lack!

      Democrats need a mind "change." Or removal from authority.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.