• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Changing Horses in Mid-Stream: There's Turmoil in Obama's Asia Policy Shop

    It is perhaps emblematic that on the same day that China releases its long-delayed 2010 defense white paper, the U.S. State Department announces that Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg will be replaced by Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns.

    Coming on the heels of the departure of Wallace “Chip” Gregson from the post of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific Security Affairs, two of the most important policymaking positions regarding Asia are now in the midst of transition.

    This would be problematic at the best of times, but these are especially troubled times. Japan’s leaders continue to focus on recovery from the recent earthquake. The Korean peninsula shows no evidence of stabilizing. Most of all, the challenge of China continues to loom. The release of the Chinese defense white paper coincides with an apparent effort to revamp Chinese foreign policy and renew its previous charm offensive. This serves as a caution to American policymakers: They cannot rely on China to make their job easier by making diplomatic mistakes.

    This would suggest the need for a closely integrated team at the State Department and the Department of Defense (DOD), so that American allies are reassured, enemies are deterred, and nations such as China are presented with a single, coherent, cohesive message.

    Yet, amidst this turmoil, six weeks before the next round of Strategic and Economic Dialogue talks with the PRC, the President has seen fit to change personnel. By most accounts, Bill Burns is a fine public servant, much admired by colleagues and the Washington policy establishment. What is unclear is whether he will get the Administration to act in such key areas as arms sales to Taiwan. Both he and Mark Lippert, the presumed nominee for the DOD position, appear to share the same characteristic: wide-ranging experience rather than an Asia focus.

    Getting both of these critical offices up and running quickly enough to make a positive difference in Asia is going to be an uphill struggle—especially in the face of a revived Chinese diplomatic juggernaut that is likely to gain speed in the coming months.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Changing Horses in Mid-Stream: There's Turmoil in Obama's Asia Policy Shop

    1. Pingback: Changing Horses in Mid-Stream: There’s Turmoil in Obama’s Asia Policy Shop | Big Propaganda

    2. Gary Zaetz, Cary, No says:

      Suspicions about China are well-grounded, despite the claims of China's defense white paper to the contrary. Consider the case of Arunachal Pradesh, a northeast Indian state which borders on China and which is the location of hundreds of crashed American aircraft that disappeared supplying China during World War II. While Beijing denies expansionistic designs, it simultaneously denounces on the airwaves of China Radio International the joint US-India operations started in 2008 to recover the bodies of American airmen lost in Arunachal Pradesh during World War II, on the grounds that this territory actually belongs to China rather than India. And how have Washington and New Delhi responded to this denunciation? They canceled the recovery operations in order to avoid annoying Beijing. This policy of appeasement by the Singh Government and the Obama Administration's ascendant kowtow faction (led by departing Under Secretary of State James Steinberg) can only serve to embolden the Beijing tyrants in their territorial designs and military ambitions.Gary Zaetz, http://www.projecthomecoming.org/

    3. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      I am suspicious of Musical Chairs to paper over Policy changes by removing people who know better. Things that shouldn't be get smuggled into the scene because the experienced people aren't there to put two and two together. I've seen this kind of "Divide and Conquer" used in all kinds of ways and diverse situtations.

      China gets all the breaks! Come to think of it all the Socialists and Communists get breaks whereas former allies get the shaft. For some strange reason our Federal Prosecutors are all blind to High Crimes and Treason. 'Precedent' Clinton purged the Justice Department and RINO George Bush let them all stay on the job, as if he never knew about the purge! These guys aren't there now that we need real Prosecutions, the DOJ can't see anything wrong. Yeah! Like that!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×