• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Hungary's New Constitution: Ideas have Consequences

    In what will surely be a publicity boon for Apple, especially among political scientists, Hungary’s new constitution is being written on an iPad.

    Thus far, this is one of the best known bits of information concerning Hungary’s current constitution drafting process. But lovers of liberty should take note of Hungary’s project not because it is a technological milestone, but because it represents a rare moment for constitutionalism and the rule of law.

    It is also a singular, albeit uncertain, moment in Hungary’s history. As such, the proposed text and the ideas that inspire it are far more important than the medium on which the words are written. James Madison, the primary drafter of the U.S. constitution, would surely have made good use of our many technological advances. He would undoubtedly object, however, to the diminished importance of basic philosophical truths and the erosion of understanding in matters of history and human nature in modern political discourse.

    In preparation for the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Madison steeped himself in the classics and studied the early Greek democracies and Roman republics in order to learn from their successes and avoid their mistakes. Madison also drew much wisdom from the Enlightenment thinking of John Locke and Montesquieu, who wrote of the importance of social compacts and separation of powers, respectively. From his studies, Madison came to believe that America could successfully become an extended republic, if the rule of law could be instituted in such a way as to frustrate the tendency of government to erode the liberties of the people. He arrived in Philadelphia with a draft text which he presented to the delegates, most of whom had also engaged in their own study of history and human nature in preparation for their monumental task.

    Over the next five months, delegates from the thirteen newly independent states debated the form of their future government. A majority of the debates focused on basic philosophical points, such as the nature of individual rights, the proper relationship between government and society, and the best methods to limit governmental power. There was also a necessary degree of political compromise in order to “secure a more perfect union.”

    Next week, the Hungarian parliament is scheduled to declare itself to be a constitutional convention and to debate several draft documents over the next five weeks. This may be a very short time in which to conclude such a great matter, but so far the constitutional process (begun last September) has gone according to schedule. The smooth sailing of what is normally a very complex, organic process has prompted some criticism from those who believe that developments are predetermined by the governing FIDESZ party, which enjoys a two-thirds majority in Parliament, enough to reform the constitution without opposition support.

    As Hungary drafts and debates a new constitution, it is undeniably a precarious moment.  But it is also a rare opportunity to replace the amended communist constitution of 1949, and as many believe, a chance to symbolically complete the regime change that began in 1989. As Hungarians contemplate the exact form of their future government and the philosophy on which it will be based, it is vital that terms of great philosophical significance, such as republicanism, self-government, and liberty, be considered on their own merits. No misuse of these terms in practice by individuals, political parties, or popular culture can erode the philosophical truths that they represent and their universal applicability.

    America’s own constitution was anchored in the universal truths set forth in the Declaration of Independence. These truths have kept America the land of the free and the home of the brave for 235 years. Their timeless relevance can be applied to Hungary’s political circumstances as surely on an iPad as with Madison’s quill pen and parchment paper. But there’s no app for that: it still takes serious philosophical work to apply timeless truths to the particular circumstances at hand. The world will watch with expectation Hungary’s new experiment in establishing good government.

    Posted in First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Hungary's New Constitution: Ideas have Consequences

    1. dvhr says:

      You write: "the amended communist constitution of 1949". Could you please mention just one communist feature of the 1989 constitution?

    2. Dr. Pal Gyarmati says:

      You see:

      this isn't YOUR BUSINESS!

      The hungarian (SAY: MAGYAR) Nation have a strong national identity, inner-asian origin, conquesting,offensive, militant people.

      The history fund it the true identity: christianism, freedom, souverainity, independency – and HEGEMONY of the Carpathian-basin, .and the East-Central Europe.

      The NEW constitution isn't only a "reforming" communist constitution:

      this is TOTALLY NEW writing constitution.

      Before 1945 the Hungarian Kingdom's – 1000 years-old – constitution was a "not-writing", the "habit-law"- style and institutional ANCIENT constitution.

      WE are seeing those constitution is the continous fund-law-system. The communist and the 1989-r "pactum"-reformed constitution we

      AND we DON'T ALLOW, don't permit let to give to the our nation something "order" or "advice" for OUR SOUVERAIN, INDEPENDENT, national statement' s CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS and CONTENTS !!

      This is OUR RIGHT-SYSTEM,

      the OUR STATE and COUNTRY, homeland,


      the OUR IDENTITY!

      Get out from this act the EU and the foreign countries!

    3. Aslan says:

      Dr. Pal Gyarmati first needs to learn how to write intelligible and grammatically correct English, and then, after 20 years of hard work, he might be allowed to post a comment….

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.