• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Reid's Obstructionism May Cause Government Shutdown

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) may cause a government shutdown.

    Senator Reid is employing a procedural strategy to deal with the House-passed long-term Continuing Resolution (CR), H.R. 1, that may make it more likely that the federal government will shut down when the government runs out of money on March 18. Remember this when we get closer to March 18 and both parties blame each other for failing to pass an appropriations bill to fund the government through September 30 of this year (the end of Fiscal Year 2011).

    The House passed a long-term CR on February 19 by a 235–189 vote. The long-term CR funds the federal government for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2011 and contains $61 billion in cuts from FY 2010 levels of spending.

    The House ended up with the $61 billion total after a week-long open debate with hundreds of amendments filed and a virtually unlimited amendment process. The House ended a five-day debate with over 40 hours of debate, over 500 amendments filed, over 150 amendments offered and over 100 recorded votes. This is extraordinary for the House, and Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) should be applauded for this relatively open process to consider a controversial appropriations measure.

    While the House was working hard to pass this important measure, the Senate was preparing for a vacation. They did nothing on the long-term CR. Not one vote, not any debate, nor did they craft a competing measure to fund the government for the remainder of the year. They went on vacation. At that time the federal government was scheduled to run out of discretionary appropriations money on March 4.

    The House and Senate had to agree to a short-term CR, because Senate Majority Leader Reid refused to allow the Senate to vote on the House-passed long-term CR. The two chambers hammered out an agreement to pass a short-term CR, H.J. Res. 44, which puts off a potential government shutdown until March 18. Now the Senate has H.R. 1 sitting on the calendar, and Senator Reid has finally announced his plan to deal with that appropriations measure.

    Reid’s plan is to force two controlled political votes on the long-term CR. The Senate is expected to have one vote on the Democrat plan followed by one on the Republican plan. It seems that Reid has no intention of allowing a free-flowing debate and amendments in the Senate. According to Bloomberg:

    The Senate’s top Democrat said he wants votes next week on House Republicans’ $61 billion budget-cutting plan and a Democratic alternative as lawmakers battle over spending levels for the rest of this fiscal year. Both proposals are likely to fail, signaling to lawmakers—including House Republican freshmen who are demanding big cuts in spending—that neither plan can get through the Senate.

    Senator Reid knows his controlled strategy will not produce an agreement on the long-term CR. He is merely playing a political game to garner a better negotiating position approaching March 18.

    “Not to spoil the surprise, but we all know how this vote will turn out — we know neither will reach the president’s desk as written,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat. After the votes “we at least know where we stand” and can “move this ball down the road a little further,” he said.

    This procedural tactic violates the agreement between Senator Reid and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) earlier this year to allow a free amendment process in the Senate. Reid had been using an obstructionist procedural tactic to block all amendments for the purposes of controlling the Senate schedule and avoiding any politically harmful votes for his members over the past four years. In this new year, Reid promised to cease the tactic, commonly known as “Filling the Tree.”

    According to The Hill:

    The reforms include an end to secret holds, a reduction in the number of presidential nominations subject to the lengthy Senate confirmation process, an end to mandatory readings for amendments if they’ve been publicly available for at least three days, an agreement by Republicans to limit their filibusters of motions to begin debate, and an agreement by Democrats to limit instances in which they “fill the tree”—or limit the number of amendments Republicans can put to a given piece of legislation.

    Not only does this tactic violate Reid’s promise not to “fill the tree,” it makes it less likely that the House and Senate will come to an agreement. The House has worked out and voted on a position. On the other hand, Reid refuses to allow the Senate to work its will and settle on a position. Reid wants to do it himself, and he is unwilling to engage in good faith negotiations with the House.

    These are dangerous procedural games being played by Senate Majority Leader Reid.

    The bottom line is that Reid’s actions may cause a government shutdown. Speaker John Boehner allowed the House to work its will, and the House produced a bill after days of negotiations, amendments and votes. As retired Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) said so well in his retirement speech, Senator Reid’s use of the “filling the tree” to block votes is “tyrannical.” Reid promised not to do it, yet he seems to be prepared to employ that tyrannical strategy to block passage of the long-term CR.

    Reid has filed cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 1, and votes are expected on Tuesday. The expectation is that Reid will allow a vote only on an amendment by Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) containing the Senate version of a long-term CR and then file cloture on the underlying House passed long-term CR. These strong-arm tactics by Reid should not be looked upon favorably by the media nor the American people, because it is a naked attempt to fool the American people into believing that the Senate has taken a good faith run at passing the long-term Continuing Resolution.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to Reid's Obstructionism May Cause Government Shutdown

    1. Pingback: Reid’s Obstructionism May Cause Government Shutdown

    2. Pingback: Spartanburg Tea Party » What Harry Reid is up to

    3. Pingback: Gaddafi tries to enforce increasingly impotent authority | Dektau

    4. West Texan says:

      Truthfully, if the 17th Amendment never existed, the senate would pass the house's proposed cuts as such would free up states' hard hit budgets.

    5. Pingback: ~ JUST IN ~ Daily News Digest {Weekend Edition} for March 5,2011 | Just Piper

    6. Bobbie says:

      Mr. Reid, how about being the first democrat to show you have some bit of human quaity? The President said "we need to come to common ground." As common knowledge has been known of the problems regarding the decline of this nation being the governments actions and overreach in spending and providing more than essentials involving public service, the common ground solution is cutting those non-essentials. This will help promote the private sector businesses as those with government (non-essential to Americans) make-work jobs can build a career for themselves in the private sector as they would've had they the proper American leadership.

      Now please, stop your force of a government shut down and do what is unexpected of you and what's best for this country. Stop wasting time holding America back.

    7. Yankee says:

      This is the favorite ideologue's tactic — refuse to compromise and blame the other side for the lack of compromise. It reminds me of nothing so much as listening to children argue. Haven't we been subjected to enough of this from those who pretend to represent us? I suppose we might be willing to accept that a bit of procedural manipulation is part of the game, but a certain Congress has taken it to a new level. We demand that the games stop, and that real government resume!

    8. Byron M Hunt, Farmla says:

      Why not shut down government. Would this bring about the wise use of money already alloted? Is our government capable of using our money wisely? Aren't all parties guilty of overspending and foolish spending. We need some wise statesmen who really have the country at heart. Let's get rid of cheap politicians!

    9. Pingback: Senate and Obama to Blame for Partial Government Shutdown | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    10. Pingback: More Transparency Needed in Budget Debate | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.