• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Libyan Revolution Reveals Foolishness of Arms Trade Treaty

    The Obama Administration has declared its support for the U.N.’s efforts to negotiate an arms trade treaty (ATT) that would regulate the transfer of conventional arms. This is unwise for many reasons. The following stories show just how an ATT, far from saving civilians, would actually tie the hands of democracies in resisting dictatorships.

    • On Monday, the second round of negotiations to create an ATT began under U.N. auspices in New York. Britain has been, and continues to be, the leading advocate for an ATT.  British newspapers routinely support its negotiation, and the Conservative-Liberal Democratic government in Britain wrote support for an ATT into their formal coalition agreement.
    • On Tuesday, David Cameron, Prime Minister of Great Britain, suggested that Britain would “consider arming Libyan opposition forces if Tripoli used more violence to crush demonstrators.”
    • The latest U.N. General Assembly Resolution supporting an ATT argues it is necessary to prevent the “diversion [of weapons] to the illicit market,” while noting “the right of all States to manufacture, import, export, transfer and retain conventional arms for self-defence and security needs.”  In short, selling weapons to a state is legitimate, but providing them to opposition forces—the “illicit market”—is not.

    So, Britain wants to arm the Libyan opposition. It also wants negotiate a treaty that would legally prohibit it from arming the Libyan opposition, while recognizing Colonel Muammar Qadhafi’s right to buy all the guns he wants. How does this make any sense at all?

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Libyan Revolution Reveals Foolishness of Arms Trade Treaty

    1. West Texan says:

      It makes sense only if Qadhafi's regime is no longer recognized as Libya's ruling government. With no known head of state, provide arms to the opposition group that best represents Libyans' individual freedoms. If you recall, we had our own problems with the British on this one.

    2. Pingback: » Financial and World News Update – 03/04/11 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    3. Pingback: On Arming the Libyan Rebels « Commentary Magazine

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×