• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • House Hearing: Secretary Sebelius Talks Fiscal Responsibility and Obamacare

    Yesterday, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on the President’s fiscal year 2012 budget and implementation of Obamacare. The Secretary’s remarks highlighted the need for fiscal responsibility and health care reform that gives greater power to individuals and more flexibility to the states. Unfortunately, none of these goals can be achieved under Obamacare.

    Sebelius told the committee, “We can’t build lasting prosperity on a mountain of debt. And we can’t win the future if we pass on massive debts to our children and grandchildren. We have a responsibility to the American people to live within our means so we can invest in the future.”

    However, the White House’s definition of “investing in the future” simply means cutting spending in one place to increase spending in another. This won’t reduce the deficit at all, instead encouraging continued unaffordable levels of federal spending. Secretary Sebelius pointed to $5 billion in reductions within the Department of Health and Human Services budget as contributing to deficit reduction and offsetting new investments. But the savings simply cannot achieve both.

    This trend pervades the new health care law. Obamacare makes more than $500 billion in cuts to Medicare, which are used to offset new spending on yet another health care entitlement program rather than increase the solvency of Medicare itself, which is responsible for $30.8 trillion in long-term unfunded obligations. Proponents of Obamacare, including the White House, have claimed that the cuts will both extend the life of Medicare and pay for new programs, but the Medicare Actuary and the Congressional Budget Office have made it clear that both cannot occur. Despite this, when questioned at the hearing about which would occur under the new law, Sebelius replied, “Both,” admitting to double-counting savings.

    Savings from the CLASS Act—a government-run long-term care program included in Obamacare—are also double-counted. Moreover, CLASS creates the illusion of raising revenue in its initial years, though in fact it contributes to rising deficits in decades to come. Sebelius pledged to ensure that the CLASS program included in Obamacare is sustainable before implementing it, but lawmakers and experts on both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that the program is completely unworkable. The only way forward is to repeal this hugely flawed program, which Sebelius would not commit to.

    Regarding health care reform, Sebelius told the committee that the President’s budget marks a commitment to “giving Americans more freedom in their health care choices” and puts “Americans in charge of their own health care.” This couldn’t be further from the truth.

    Obamacare gives Washington greater power over every aspect of the health care system. Its strict rules and regulations will limit choice and competition in the insurance market, reducing Americans’ choices. Moreover, the law includes none of the consumer-driven reforms that would encourage Americans to take greater control of their health care decisions. And though Sebelius claims that states will have flexibility to implement reform their way, this is also false. States have been charged to carry out the changes made under Obamacare as defined by Washington, with little leeway to take a different approach.

    If Sebelius was serious when she said that the federal government should become more fiscally responsible and encourage patients and the states to take control of health care reform, then there’s only one way forward: repeal Obamacare.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to House Hearing: Secretary Sebelius Talks Fiscal Responsibility and Obamacare

    1. Pingback: House Hearing: Secretary Sebelius Talks Fiscal Responsibility and Obamacare

    2. racheltucke says:

      I would recommend this health insurance plan i found through wise health insurance to anyone with a growing family who is looking to minimize their medical expenses.

    3. Bobbie says:

      Double counting… there seems to be alot of that when it's in the democrats hands. Wonder if "entitlement" and "special interests" are double counted, overlapping, entwined, or combined…

      The article mentions words of conservatives now being used by Sebelius but read closely to what she says, she wants to confuse: "can’t win the future if we pass on massive debts to our children and grandchildren. Responsibility to the American people to live within our means so THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, (not government) can invest in THEIR FUTURE!” …true dedicated, American leadership, the exact opposite of today's.

    4. cmm912, NY says:

      My question is, WHERE ARE CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, NY TIMES, USA TODAY, LA TIMES, WASHINGTON POST, NPR, PBS, ET AL, to let the world know that SOMEONE IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ACTUALLY ADMITTED THAT THEY ARE DOUBLE-COUNTING IN OBAMACARE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

      THIS IS HUGE NEWS, AND IT IS A DISGRACE, AND IT IS MORE PROOF, THAT THE LEFT-WING MEDIA ARE COMPLICIT IN PROMOTING OBAMA'S AGENDA, AND COVERING-UP THE CORRUPTION IN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION!!!!!!!!

      EVERY SINGLE "NEWS" OUTLET THAT IGNORES THIS STORY, OR PUTS IT ON PAGE 32, SHOULD HAVE THEIR LICENSE REVOKED, IMMEDIATELY AND FOREVER!!!!

      NEVER IN MY 54 YEARS HAVE I SEEN SUCH A CORRUPT MEDIA IN THE USA!!!!! AND I'M NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT ONE ROGUE MEDIA OUTLET CARRYING THE WATER FOR AN ADMINISTRATION, IT IS EVERY, SINGLE (NON-CONSERVATIVE) MEDIA OUTLET IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY – AND THAT IS A WHOLE, WHOLE, WHOLE, WHOLE LOT OF OUTLETS!!!!!!

    5. Pingback: Does A 100yr Democrat-Progressive Ban Resonate with YOU? | Secure The Republic With Sarah

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×