• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Raymond Davis Tension Perfect Time to Ramp up Pakistan Civil Society Dialogue

    In the midst of a tense bilateral dispute between the U.S. and Pakistan over the case of Raymond Davis—an American Embassy employee who shot and killed two armed Pakistanis in what he claims was self-defense—civil society leaders from both countries met in Lahore, Pakistan, February 17-19. The initiative, dubbed the U.S.-Pakistan Leaders Forum, was convened by the U.S.-Muslim Engagement Initiative (a non-governmental, non-partisan collaboration of four U.S.-based organizations) and hosted by the Lahore University of Management Sciences, a world-class educational institute started in 1985 by Pakistani industrialist Syed Babar Ali.

    During the meetings, in which I had the honor to participate, think tank experts, NGO activists, educational leaders, and agricultural experts sat down, rolled up their sleeves, and generated ideas for closer collaboration between the two countries in areas such as media education, scaling up community peace-building efforts, increasing academic collaboration at the university, primary, and secondary levels, and developing agriculture partnerships that would bring farmers together in hands-on collaborative endeavors.

    One outcome of the engagement was to highlight the immediate need to recalibrate the U.S.-Pakistan aid relationship. The U.S. has provided more than $6 billion in economic assistance to Pakistan over the last nine years, but representatives from both countries complained that there was very little to show for it. For instance, a $75 million U.S. grant for teacher training was badly mismanaged and virtually wasted. All agreed there were serious structural problems in the way U.S. aid is delivered that need immediate attention.

    A recent GAO report on U.S. civilian assistance to Pakistan recommends several steps to improve the monitoring and accountability of U.S. aid to Pakistan, including requiring Pakistani organizations that receive contracts or grants to implement a conflict of interest policy, recruit more qualified internal audit and procurement staff, embed approved CPA staff, and participate in a capacity-building program.

    Some Pakistani youth called for more job-generating public-private partnerships, saying “send us your skilled people, not just your money.” They viewed the public-private Punjab Rural Support Program as a potential model for future U.S. aid programming.

    Role of Media

    Much of the discussion also centered on the role of the media —both in the U.S. and Pakistan—in shaping perceptions (and misperceptions) about the other side. Most participants agreed that the Pakistani media were increasingly biased in reporting on the U.S. and guilty of churning out a steady diet of anti-American conspiracy theories and rhetoric. While some journalists and editors admitted they sometimes “self-censored” because of unspecified pressures, they also said their newspapers and satellite TV stations were largely responding to the public mood.

    Participants also criticized U.S. media coverage of Pakistan, indicating that the U.S. tended to cover only negative news in Pakistan and that the coverage was often shallow and one-dimensional. Furthermore, American media tended to show a general lack of understanding of the local drivers of conflict in Pakistan and a mischaracterization of the role of religion in the conflict. U.S. audiences generally see a secular-religious divide as driving the conflict in Pakistan, when the ground realities are much more complex.

    Davis Case Looms Large

    The Pakistan media frenzy over the Davis case has driven anti-American sentiment to dangerously high levels. The Jamaat-i-Islami organized a rally last week in which protesters shouted down America and burned effigies of Davis. The Davis case has the potential to severely damage ties, if not handled carefully.

    The U.S. is adamant that Davis has diplomatic immunity and was acting in self-defense, but the Zardari government is weak and feels it has little choice but to follow the public mood. Further complicating the case is the high level of tension between the countries’ intelligence services. Several media reports indicate Davis may have been involved in a clandestine operational act and that the Pakistanis killed may have been ISI surveillants.

    The Davis incident has proved to be a watershed in the complicated U.S.-Pakistan relationship. It may take time for tempers to cool and a decision to free him to come. In the meantime, hopefully initiatives like the U.S.-Pakistan Leaders Forum will help build greater understanding and trust at the societal level that will eventually form the foundation for a strong and lasting, mutually beneficial partnership between Pakistan and the U.S.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Raymond Davis Tension Perfect Time to Ramp up Pakistan Civil Society Dialogue

    1. Pingback: Raymond Davis Tension Perfect Time to Ramp up Pakistan Civil Society Dialogue

    2. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      Why am I suspicious? This is another Man Caused Disaster of Obama's Foreign Policy. This is our guy! Probably a spy, I don't know, but we really don't know if he is a "good guy" because our own Nation has been usurped by Communists! Just because he is our guy doesn't mean what he was doing in Pakistan was lawful. Was he fomenting a Revolution like so many of the American Foreigners in the Middle East? Is he like the operatives who set up the Egyptian Unions to strike the first minute out of the box?

      I think America leads best by her example! It wouldn't hurt the World one bit if America suspended all her meddling and restored Representative Democracy at home. We are rapidly losing our Way of Life here! Since we aren't getting credit and virtually all our efforts have backfired we ought to come home and rebuild America. Maybe if we actually stood for something we would be seen well in the World. The bad press overseas wouldn't change, we just wouldn't have to pay for it!

    3. David Evans, Denver, says:

      Do we gain anything by having a relationship with Pakistan? I don't see any evidence. I also observe that when there's any conflict or disagreement it always seems to be an action for US to solve. It's always our money, our expert advise, our military hardware donations, our everything and for that we receive insults. I say we part paths without any fanfare. Maybe our absence will cause the agitators to re-direct their venom.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×