House and Senate leaders are caught in a debate over real and phantom discretionary spending cuts. Senate leaders have proposed freezing 2011 discretionary spending at 2010 levels. Because this rejects the President’s proposed $39 billion increase, they are calling their yet-to-be-released proposal a $39 billion cut—essentially, claiming credits for “cuts” against a spending level that was never enacted in the first place.
By contrast, the House-passed bill not only rejected the President’s proposed $39 billion hike but actually $61 billion cut off the 2010 level. Thus, only the House bill reduces spending below the 2010 level.
The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now
House v. Senate Proposal
- Regular discretionary spending in 2010 totaled $1,089 billion.
- President Obama proposed a 2011 level of $1,128 billion—$39 billion more than in 2010.
- Senate leaders have proposed funding discretionary spending at the 2010 level of $1,089 billion—essentially rejecting the President’s $39 billion increase. They now claim this as a “spending cut.”
- The House-passed bill not only refused President Obama’s proposed $39 billion increase; it cut an additional $61 billion in discretionary spending, down to $1,028 billion.
- In short, the Senate proposal contains no cuts relative to 2010 levels, while the House plan cut $61 billion from 2010 levels.
Does the House Get Back to 2008 Levels?
- Originally, the House had proposed beginning with the President’s 2011 proposal of $478 billion in non-security discretionary spending and then cutting $100 billion, down to $378 billion—which was also the 2008 level.
- However, the House did pass $81 billion in cuts off the President’s non-security proposal (the other $19 billion came out of security spending), so non-security discretionary spending was not brought all the way down to 2008 levels.
English
Français
Deutsch
Italiano
Español