• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Third Wave Revolution in the Middle East...and the Administration's Cluelessness

    First it was the Arab and Persian nationalist revolts against European colonialism.  Next it was the Islamist revolt against the corrupt monarchies and nationalist regimes set up in the nationalist era.  Now we have a third wave of revolt across the Middle East that is unprecedented and unpredictable.

    Arab nationalism was largely an elite phenomenon that drove and exploited popular sentiments.  Islamism is driven by clerics and political ideologues like the Muslim Brotherhood who likewise exploit peoples’ religious beliefs and social resentments.  The current third wave of revolt is truly a bottom-up, people driven movement.  It’s driven not by nationalism, Islamism or any other 20th Century “ism,” but by a 21st Century socially linked-up mass movement of people who are sick of corruption, the lack of representative government, and being poor.

    It is an important fact that these movements cut across national boundaries.  All the past movements in the Middle East—nationalist and Islamist—pretended to be “pan” movements of some kind.   But they never caught on because their universal claims were myths, undermined by tribal, religious, and nationalist divisions.

    The third wave revolt is different. Despite the unique national and tribal features of each movement, it is united by the same emotional revulsion to the ruin and corruption created by the first two waves of revolution in the Middle East.  The people of Libya are no less disgusted with Qadhafi than the people of Iran are with Ahmadinejad.  One may be largely Sunni Arabs and the other Shiite Persians, but both are utterly finished with the ideologies, pretentions, and results of the Middle East’s first two failed revolutions.

    A tale-tell sign this is happening is that al-Qaeda is utterly sidelined.  Its leaders are actually horrified by this outbreak of demands for democracy and freedom, since they are utterly against them.  While the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is trying to figure out how to take advantage of this new opening, even they are keeping their Islamist goals shrouded.  The time for Islamists revolutions, which began with Iran in the 1970s, may be finally ending in the Middle East. Of course, like all revolutions, there will be backlashes and in some instances, Islamists may come to power. We have to watch out for that.

    The new Middle East revolution has taken the Obama administration completely by surprise, and for good reason: Their whole approach to the Middle East is thoroughly outdated and irrelevant.  Obama’s “engagement” strategy toward the “Islamic world” is irrelevant to the Middle East. It completely misses the point, which is the peoples’ demand for freedom and better standards of living.  All it seems to do is to cause Obama to launch denunciations with dizzying speed when it is a pro-American dictator like Egypt’s Mubarak, but to delay for days in saying a word when it’s an anti-American thug like Libya’s Qadhafi and Iran’s Ahmadinejad.

    Everything the Obama administration thinks is important in the Middle East—from the Arab-Israeli talks to Obama’s idea that we need only prove we don’t hate Islam—are completely beside the point.  Obama’s weak responses are not caused by wise caution, but by cluelessness.  His world view is stuck in a past where people actually believed if only America humbled itself sufficiently, and Israel stopped provoking Palestinians with things like building settlements, peace would break out and the people of the Middle East would live happily ever after.

    We are in a totally new, unpredictable, and historic phase in the Middle East. No one—particularly Barack Obama—knows exactly where it is heading.  However, we had better get our objectives and strategy clear very quickly.

    The vacillation has got to end.  If we find Qadhafi’s suppression of the revolt unacceptable, we need to do more than “monitor,” “coordinate,” and “consult.”  If we want to see the Egyptian revolution turn out well, we need to be more forceful in talking with the army there about how to proceed with elections and reform the economy.  If we find Ahmadinejad’s behavior unacceptable, we need to consider options more forceful than talking with “multilateral institutions.”

    Above all, the administration needs to wake up and realize that it’s facing a new world.  As Elliott Abrams noted, when Amre Moussa, the secretary general of the Arab League, is more forceful in denouncing human rights violations in the Middle East than the American President, you know you are more than a few steps behind history.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to The Third Wave Revolution in the Middle East...and the Administration's Cluelessness

    1. Daniel, Lebec, CA says:

      If this is a real expression for freedom from middle east youth, then Israel, American (supposed) colonialism, and even Islamism, will become irrelevant very quickly as the people look for and find opportunity to build their own little pot of wealth. Success breeds Success. We, as a nation, need to look for ways to encourage economic freedom for all in these circumstances.

    2. mmp60, CA says:

      Typical right wing drivel, long on Obama bashing, very short on a detailed description of what steps you would have taken, as president, with Iran, Egypt and Libya situations??… oh shoot, how about we just bomb, invade and ask questions later? Seemed to work so well for Saint Reagan and W.

    3. Pingback: The Third Wave Revolution in the Middle East…and the Administration’s … – Heritage.org (blog) | PAULitics.US - Wake Up America

    4. Julie Jones Washingt says:

      Andy Stern, frequent visitor to the White House, says he is proud of his international union work. He has offices all around the world. Yesterday it was reported that the Egyptian protestors sent pizza to their "brothers and sisters" in "Wiscairo" (Wisconsin) for support. Protestors all around the world can be seen to be made up of unions, socialists, and communists, including those mobilized by Van Jones and the democrats. Are you sure these are spontaneous movements? George Soros, who yearns for an Open Society, has funded many, many of the groups protesting, and he has an impressive record of bringing countries down.

    5. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      Kim, I agree! Barack Obama is clueless! He never was qualified to be a U.S. President! He was a community organizer, perhaps not even a Citizen! So far he has a baptismal notice, how is that for Vetting a candidate! More than that, Obama filled the whole Administration with clueless idealogues, every one of them is doing stupid and un-American things! But, it is important to recognize, Obama does all these atrocities on purpose! Clueless about the American Way, about the American people, about Representative Democracy! But Obama is not clueless about Socialist ways and Communist principles! He knows exactly what he is doing! Every anti American thing you can conceive of!

      That's the difference. Obama just doesn't believe in America.

    6. Rick74, Manassas, VA says:

      "A tale-tell sign"? I would tell no tales, but I think it is a tell-tale sign of an editing shortfall here.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×