- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
New Year, Same Commissions and Committees at the U.N.
Posted By Grace Melton On February 24, 2011 @ 2:00 pm In American Leadership | 5 Comments
February marks the beginning of the season of commission meetings at the United Nations in New York, where the Commission for Social Development wrapped up last week and the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW ) is just beginning.
Delegates to the Commission for Social Development discussed the lofty goal of poverty eradication  as their priority theme and debated the effectiveness of social protection schemes in meeting the Millennium Development Goals  (MDGs ). The CSW, typically  a forum for international feminist frenzy, is poised to discuss the priority theme of “access and participation of women and girls in education, training, science and technology, including for the promotion of women’s equal access to full employment and decent work.” The U.S. delegation  to CSW this year includes actress Geena Davis, Google’s Megan Smith, and Melanne Verveer, the new Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues.
Meanwhile, the year’s first meetings of several committees began in Geneva, where the “experts” who sit on various treaty monitoring bodies reviewed several countries’ compliance with some of the U.N.’s human rights treaties. These included meetings of the Committee on the Rights of the Child , the Committee on the Elimination of Racial  Discrimination, and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women—the treaty body that focuses on the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)—which concluded its 48th session  in Geneva with its review of Bangladesh, Belarus, Israel, Kenya, Lichtenstein, South Africa, and Sri Lanka.
After each submitting reports to the committee, delegations from these seven countries answered questions from committee members and received heavy-handed recommendations on how to better fulfill their obligations under CEDAW. This session was no different from the CEDAW committee’s usual  fare, with recommendations urging countries to decriminalize abortion (Kenya ), expand legal protections for same-sex couples (Sri Lanka ), increase access to affordable family planning and contraceptive services (Bangladesh ), and combat traditional gender stereotypes (Belarus ). Each meeting of the CEDAW committee continues to provide additional illustrations of why the U.S. should steer clear of ratifying  CEDAW.
U.S. advocates of the controversial  CEDAW treaty have spent decades claiming that women are underrepresented in certain academic and professional fields  as a result of gender discrimination and have successfully lobbied for a slew of legal and policy remedies  (including Title IX programs) to their much hyperbolized  grievances. Finally, a recent paper  in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences evaluated 20 years worth of data and concluded that women are, in fact, treated equally—if not better—when interviewing for a job, receiving funding, or publishing papers in the United States.
There is some speculation that the Obama Administration will push for the Senate to ratify CEDAW this year. One hopes that reason and evidence prevail and that the U.S. Senate maintains its opposition to making the U.S. a party to CEDAW.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/02/24/new-year-same-commissions-and-committees-at-the-u-n/
URLs in this post:
 CSW: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/55sess.htm
 eradication: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/csocd/2011/prioritytheme-note.pdf
 Millennium Development Goals: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
 MDGs: http://blog.heritage.org../?p=40670
 typically: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/04/CEDAW-and-the-New-UN-Gender-Office-The-US-Can-Do-Better
 delegation: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2011/02/156814.htm
 Child: http://www.turtlebayandbeyond.org/2011/abortion/crcs-56th-session-concluding-observations/
 Racial: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2008/08/The-Inequities-of-the-UN-Committee-on-the-Elimination-of-Racial-Discrimination
 session: http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=10713&LangID=E
 usual: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2009/01/CEDAW-How-UN-Interference-Threatens-the-Rights-of-American-Women
 Kenya: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW-C-KEN-CO-7.pdf
 Sri Lanka: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW-C-LKA-CO-7.pdf
 Bangladesh: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW-C-BGD-CO-7.pdf
 Belarus: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/co/CEDAW-C-BLR-CO-7.pdf
 ratifying: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/Womens-Rights-Are-Human-Rights
 controversial: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/12/Five-Controversial-Treaties-to-Be-Wary-of-in-2011
 fields: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/259744/science-saturated-sexism-christina-hoff-sommers
 remedies: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2004/09/Girl-Power-Why-Girls-Dont-Need-the-Womens-Educational-Equity-Act
 hyperbolized: http://www.aei.org/book/515
 paper: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/02/02/1014871108.abstract
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.