• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • No Celebration on Stimulus Anniversary

    Today marked the two-year anniversary of President Obama’s economic stimulus law. But based on the reaction from Capitol Hill, there was little reason to celebrate.

    Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) held a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing Wednesday morning with Heritage’s J.D. Foster, George Mason University economics professor Russell Roberts, and Stanford University economics professor John Taylor.

    Jordan intentionally left two empty seats as placeholders for Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, architects of the $787 billion plan. Both declined to attend and Jordan turned down an offer from the Obama administration to send replacements.

    Their absence resulted in a “chorus” of Keynesian stimulus condemnation.

    Heritage’s Foster broke down the stimulus with a simple bathtub analogy: “Suppose you pour a bucket of water into a bathtub. You would expect the level of the water to rise. But where did the water in the bucket come from? It came from dipping it into the bathtub. You may make a splash, but when the water settles, in terms of the water level nothing will have changed.”

    During his testimony, Taylor honed in on the fallacy that the legislation had much of anything to do with infrastructure spending, one of Obama’s top selling points about the stimulus. Taylor argued that the government’s own data proved that little of the stimulus funds went to infrastructure projects, while most of the money sent to the states was not used to increase spending but instead used to reduce the amount of borrowing or other spending cuts, thus delaying the necessary state fiscal consolidations. He argued that with respect to infrastructure, the modest amounts actually spent reflected the fact that government “cannot get money out the door fast enough.” The lengthy amount of time necessary to get these so-called “shovel ready” projects off the ground prevents them from being an immediate economic boon.

    In an act of political theater, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) went through a rapid-fire round of questioning to prod the “chorus of folks saying the same thing.” He accepted only yes or no answers for seven straight questions that narrowly focused on the “benefits” of the stimulus: Did money for small businesses help those small businesses? Did a boost in paychecks help that person’s family? Did guaranteed loans to farmers and ranchers help farmers and ranchers?

    The panel mostly repeated the same answer to each question: Yes, it helped those individuals and businesses that got the money, but it did not help the economy overall. Cummings did not appear pleased by these answers, which plainly avoided the simple trap he had hoped to set.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to No Celebration on Stimulus Anniversary

    1. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      These guys are in the business of bringing down the greatest Nation the World has ever seen! Rep. Cummings (D) cannot explain the Stimulus, it is a boondoggle, really, payoffs and faking jobs! The audacity of not answering direct questions! That is Representation and this Demo-crat refused to Represent. Don't ask me who this guy is Representing, but it is not American Interests! All in all, they were stealing this money, wasting this money and paying off their Union friends. They got stimulated all right! Not the rest of us!

    2. KP California says:

      Proud to say our green sign for the stimulus money is posted on the freeway in Belmont so everyone knows what paid for an elaborate overpass over 101 freeway. Yup! a new overpass JUST for bikes.!!!! The laughable part is that almost next to this overpass is another elaborate overpass with availability for bikes, but this overpass is for cars. What a waste of money. What happened to all the gas taxes we pay to cover road work. Gone?

      San Mateo has a huge brand new Police station. Do not know what was wrong with the old one.

      New firestations popping up all over the place. Do not see what was wrong with the old ones.

      Hi way 280 is proud to boast stimulus at work for re doing rest area (new bathrooms). Do not know what was wrong with the old rest area. It was nice.

      It's a place you stop for just a few minutes and leave.

      It seems stimulus money is being used for projects that people really needed to go look for to have something to spend it on. WASTE

      Everyone of this projects could have waited until the economy was better and California would not be in this position.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×