• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Community Development Block Grants: Waste the Continuing Resolution Should Cut

    Last Friday, the House Appropriations Committee unveiled its revised spending plan for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2011. This continuing resolution would reduce discretionary spending by more than $100 billion compared to the spending levels requested in President Obama’s FY 2011 budget proposal.

    Though enacting serious spending reductions is the only fiscally responsible way to put the nation’s fiscal house on sound footing, liberals have responded to cuts by calling them “unworkable,” “dire,” and “disturbing.” But a closer look reveals that the opposite is true.

    One program that the Appropriations Committee proposes to cut is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Heritage’s Ronald Utt writes that the CDBG was intended to “provide housing assistance to low-income families and improve the economic environment in their communities.” But rather than solely assisting the poor as it was intended, the CDBG program has become a source of funding for wasteful pork-barrel projects since its 1974 inception, such as the Mark Twain House and Museum, the Salvador Dali Museum, and the Helen Keller Birthplace Foundation.

    When federal programs fail to meet their intended purpose or otherwise become outdated and ineffective, the responsible thing for Congress to do is eliminate them. Instead, as Heritage budget expert Brian Riedl writes, “Congress often allows the federal government to run the same programs for decades, despite many studies showing their ineffectiveness.” The House Republicans’ proposal would cut the CDBG by $2.95 billion relative to its current funding. This is a good step in the right direction, but as Riedl suggests in his proposal to cut $343 billion from the federal budget, Congress could eliminate the CDBG altogether, saving $6 billion in taxpayer dollars.

    Congress should also consolidate other duplicative programs aimed at economic and community development. Writes Utt:

    By consolidating the resources and responsibility for economic and community development within a single entity, the federal government will be better able to coordinate assistance and to focus on legitimate projects. Under current arrangements, characterized by dispersed responsibilities, federal development programs have degenerated into a grab-bag of wasteful pork-barrel projects designed to reward influential constituencies and Washington lobbyists—at the expense of those the programs were initially designed to help.

    President Obama’s proposed budget for FY 2012, hugely flawed though it is, also makes cuts to the CDBG program. In the ensuing House debate over the continuing resolution proposal, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle must show they can get down to the necessary business of reducing spending and the deficit. Programs like CDBG waste taxpayer dollars and add to the deficit.

    Co-authored by Emily Goff.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Community Development Block Grants: Waste the Continuing Resolution Should Cut

    1. juandos says:

      "The House Republicans’ proposal would cut the CDBG by $2.95 billion relative to its current funding. This is a good step in the right direction, but as Riedl suggests in his proposal to cut $343 billion from the federal budget, Congress could eliminate the CDBG altogether, saving $6 billion in taxpayer dollars"…

      Riedl has it right, dump the program completely and by pass the 'baby steps' these RINOs want to accomplish…

      In fact if there were REAL conservatives among the majority Republicans in the House the real cuts would be with a 50% cut in spending and agency numbers in this: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance which is nothing but an ever expanding series of programs that 'pander to the parsitic' at the expense of the productive….

    2. LibertyAtStake, Alex says:

      "When federal programs fail to meet their intended purpose or otherwise become outdated and ineffective…"

      How's that energy independence thing working out at Dept of Energy?

      http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com
      "Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive"

    3. Pingback: Tweets that mention Community Development Block Grants: Waste the Continuing Resolution Should Cut #Ongoing_Priorities #heritage #tcot -- Topsy.com

    4. Kevin G says:

      Totally disagree, CDBG was a Republican-initiated program (Nixon) to return federal tax dollars to local communities for revitalization efforts and reduce the number of categorical programs to cities. It returns decision making power to the local level, which a lot of Washington "top down" folks apparently dont like. Does that mean that some money is not optimally spent? Perhaps, but one can find that in the Defense Department, in inefficent tax breaks, and so forth.

      A few anecdotes should not be enough to curb a highly successful program that has garnered the support of local Democrats and Republicans alike. As usual, Washington just doesn't get it.

    5. Bobbie says:

      CHOP! CHOP! Doesn't matter where it came from, it's become fraud. Ya' notice these programs don't influence self sufficiency or independence or accountabilities or even expectations? For the love of government's love of themselves. Government Job security… CHOP, CHOP AND CHOP SOME MORE! PLEASE! FOR THE SAKE OF INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. we need a business friendly, open market. Dems only know how to prevent job growth unless it's government jobs. Please do what you can to fulfill the commencement of the free market!

    6. Yvonne, Denver says:

      FYI–

      Meals on Wheels- feeds homebound elderly

      Project Angel Heart- feeds terminally ill inividuals

      Food Pantries, Life/safety facility improvements

      CDBG benefits low- and moderate-income persons, prevents or eliminaties slums or blight, and addresses community development needs having a particular urgency when existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community for which other funding is not available

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×