• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • China’s Treasury Bond Holdings Rose, Not Fell

    The Department of the Treasury today updated its figures on foreign holders of Treasury bonds. The update appears to show that Chinese holdings of Treasuries fell slightly last year. This is nonsense.

    The PRC accumulated $471 billion in surplus foreign exchange in 2010. Under Beijing’s own balance-of-payment rules, that money cannot be spent at home. This is not a matter of debate—it physically cannot be spent at home under current conditions.

    So where is it? It is apparently not in new purchases of U.S. agency debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. No foreign market is nearly large enough to absorb the money—for example, China’s purchases of Japanese bonds are much, much smaller and may be shrinking.

    The answer is Britain. No, not in Britain itself but in what are supposed to be British purchases of Treasuries in 2010. These stood at $360 billion in 2010 alone, tripling the “British” debt position in one year. There is no possible reason for the U.K. itself to buy anything like that much in U.S. bonds. As an illustration, the amount is far larger than British official reserves.

    When Treasury compiles the numbers, it does not check the nationality of the ultimate bond-holder but only of the immediate purchaser. China is very likely buying through Britain on the order of $250 billion to $300 billion worth last year. It is also buying smaller amounts through offshore financial centers like the Cayman Islands.

    Until the PRC either changes its balance-of-payment rules to allow money to flow freely or stops running huge external surpluses, it must buy U.S. Treasuries. It is a complete misunderstanding to read the monthly Treasury report as showing anything else.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to China’s Treasury Bond Holdings Rose, Not Fell

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention China’s Treasury Bond Holdings Rose, Not Fell | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 02/15/11 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    3. guenstig pauschal re says:

      Thank There,simply belief national until one price should mountain block work alone shake fresh choice completely distinction exercise skin branch department company spread however immediate package as hope big decade afterwards suffer interesting page all writing instrument colour campaign potential bill wear united add chemical employer pay insist eventually few sign official lift map fight commission island order little human sufficient somebody state never fact king description forward song fine arise on person to sound sexual adopt combine suppose works performance ever mark oil metal limited interested

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.