• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • PODCAST: WikiLeaks, New START, Harming Friends

    Great Britain has been a stalwart ally and friend to the United States, helping us save the world in World Wars I and II, and the Cold War, and is currently helping in our fight against implacable Islamism. Our connection goes deep, which is why the most recent revelation from WikiLeaks is such a blow to our relationship, and further evidence that Heritage was right about its concerns regarding New START.

    It has been revealed that New START, in addition to requiring traditional information (the number and type of items transferred; the date of transfer; and the location of transfer), requires that the unique identifier – serial numbers of missiles – and location of the transferred missiles (note, not where the transfer takes place, as has historically been required, but where the missiles are deployed) must be provided.

    This is a departure from requirements of earlier nuclear arms control treaties, notably the 1991 START Treaty.

    Under the new treaty, since we provide Britain with Trident II missiles for its nuclear arsenal, we will now be obligated to release this previously secret information to the Russians.

    This is especially troubling because Britain has relied on its enemies not knowing where its nuclear weapons reside, nor revealing the extent to which their nuclear power reaches. This treaty reverses that security. Eventually, the Russians could be given a very clear picture of the full nuclear infrastructure of the UK.

    Ultimately, this serves Russia’s interest of driving a wedge between us and the United Kingdom by encroaching on Britain’s right to its own nuclear defenses. We’ve effectively surrendered some of Britain’s nuclear defense sovereignty to Russia, without British input.

    And as it turns out, as a result of this treaty with Russia, we may have breeched a security agreement with Britain that’s been honored for over a half-century now, reaching back to 1958. That agreement states:

    Except as may be otherwise agreed for civil uses, the information communicated or exchanged, or the materials or equipment transferred, by either Party pursuant to this Agreement shall be used by the recipient Party exclusively for the preparation or implementation of defense plans in the mutual interest of the two countries.

    In other words, neither party may release information to a third party, unless it benefits the defenses of the two countries. How handing the Russians secretive information about the nuclear defenses of perhaps our most important ally is hard to understand.

    So, how can the United States rectify this situation? What will the likely response from Britain be? And will this damage our special relationship with the UK?

    For answers, listen to Heritage expert Ted Bromund discuss that and more, in a newly released Heritage in Focus podcast.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to PODCAST: WikiLeaks, New START, Harming Friends

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention PODCAST: WikiLeads, New START, Harming Friends | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    2. jj says:

      What country would want to be an ally of the US since this regime has taken over? They have no sense of responsibility to protect our long standing relationships with our allies. Obama will sell them out in order to make a name for himself, never thinking about the consequences of his actions. He is a threat to the security of this nation as well as other nations who would be foolish enough to have faith in our commitments. It seems that this regime is doing irreparable harm by design or incomptentence.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.