• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • CIFTA: Treaty Without a Purpose

    The Organization of American States (OAS) is an enthusiastic backer of its CIFTA treaty, the Spanish-language abbreviation for the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials. President Clinton signed CIFTA in 1997, but it has not been ratified by the Senate.

    That is fortunate, for CIFTA is a bad treaty: It poses serious risks to liberties guaranteed by the First and Second Amendments and would undermine U.S. sovereignty by legally binding it to fulfill obligations that some current signatories already disregard. The OAS’s latest statement on “Reducing the Threat of Arms and Munitions in the Americas” demonstrates that the treaty is pointless as well as bad.

    The OAS reports on its efforts to help Colombia destroy firearms surrendered by paramilitary forces, assist member states with marking firearms, help Nicaragua and Guatemala destroy stockpiles of expired military ammunition, and aid the same countries with cleaning up munitions from abandoned or military sites. These are worthy projects—not high-profile ones, to be sure, but as long as the destruction of arms is non-coercive, they are sensible, technical ways to provide humanitarian assistance.

    According to the OAS, all of this activity falls “within the framework of CIFTA.” Thus, it was Canada that provided funding for the mission in Colombia. In Guatemala and Nicaragua, the Golden West Humanitarian Foundation—headquartered in California—and the governments of Canada, Italy, and the United States worked together to provide financial and technical support for the various projects.

    But Italy, of course, is not a signatory of CIFTA. It’s not even in the OAS. Canada and the United States are in the OAS, but neither has ratified CIFTA. And the Golden West Humanitarian Foundation has charitable status from the U.S. government. Thus, apart from the OAS itself, none of the governments and organizations that were involved in these activities “within the framework of CIFTA” are actually party to any of CIFTA’s obligations.

    And yet the activities happened anyhow. The treaty has nothing to do with what is happening on the ground, where the U.S., U.S. NGOs, and a few other Western countries are doing solid, sensible humanitarian work. Collaboration like this doesn’t require a treaty that endlessly and automatically commits U.S. resources and pretends to apply to rogue regimes like Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela. It requires voluntary cooperation between willing partners, the kind of cooperation that allows the U.S. to provide effective, meaningful humanitarian relief while protecting its sovereignty. The OAS’s own report shows that CIFTA contributes nothing to this cause.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to CIFTA: Treaty Without a Purpose

    1. George Colgrove, VA says:

      We are signing off our rights not only to the thugs in DC but also to the rest of the world.

    2. Pingback: Tweets that mention CIFTA: Treaty Without a Purpose | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    3. Bobbie says:

      Boy, government has been pooping on America for quite some time! I feel bad the damage democrats cause, more knowingly and some not, leaving an ungodly mess for Republicans to clean. We're being led by people without principle when it comes to democrats.

      I heard chuck schummer named off three branches of government that weren't judicial, legislative or executive. Which means he doesn't know what his job is! I think one of the branches he stated was the "press." I wish I could remember the three idiot words he used.

    4. Bobbie says:

      We’re being led by people without principle when it comes to democrats and rinos.

    5. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 02/04/11 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    6. Pingback: China, India Forge Alternative to UN Climate Treaty | Latest news on renewable energy and effective utilization

    7. Pingback: CIFTA: Treaty Without a Purpose | Big Propaganda

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×