• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Turmoil in the Middle East, Confusion in the White House

    There was a time when the U.S. government boldly supported democratic movements and spoke out unabashedly in favor of political and human rights. It wasn’t even that long ago—under the Bush and Reagan Administrations, actually—but it seems like eons. Consider President Obama’s comment in the State of the Union speech that the United States “stands with the people of Tunisia” (whatever this code means) while ignoring that at that very moment tens of thousands of demonstrators had taken to the streets of Cairo and other Egyptian cities, protesting the 30-year reign of Hosni Mubarak.

    It is true that the U.S. has a lot at stake in Egypt, an important ally and a keystone of regional stability. And the Egyptian opposition movement certainly has the potential to be hijacked by radical Islamists if it comes to power, more so than the predominantly secular opposition in Tunisia. Yet a moderate democratic political center is desperately what the country needs, and the Obama Administration has done nothing to encourage its emergence up to this point (unlike the Bush Administration, which kept Mubarak at arms length). Similarly, the Obama Administration squandered the opportunity to clearly pledge support to the opposition green movement in Iran in 2009, which would have yielded more potential benefits and entailed far fewer risks than supporting Egypt’s opposition.

    The inevitable conclusion is that in the Obama era, the United States government will support you if you fight for democratic change—and have already won. Now, there is a bold stance for you. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has since amended this position to include a call for the Egyptian government to please keep the social networks of the Internet open. And President Obama went on YouTube Thursday to urge the Egyptian that political reforms were “absolutely critical” and reminded everyone that “violence is not the answer.” Courageous statements indeed.

    Belatedly, Clinton took to the airwaves on Sunday for a full round of morning talk shows to declare U.S. support for free elections and a speedy political transition. This is a no-brainer at this point, when demonstrations and strikes are spreading throughout Egypt.

    A similarly cautious, indeed faltering, tone has characterized the Obama Administration’s reaction to events in Yemen, where protesters—like those in Egypt, inspired by the Tunisian example—have similarly taken to the streets. And before these events, the June 2009 election in Iran severely befuddled the Administration, even though the regime in Tehran is as obviously unsavory as any on the planet. “The United States has refrained from commenting on the election in Iran. We obviously hope that the outcome reflects the genuine will and desire of the Iranian people,” White House spokesman Roberts Gibbs memorably stated. Later the State Department crowed about persuading Twitter to keep open its Internet network in order to allow Iranian protesters to use this tool for organizing. Yet, as helpful as this phone call might have been, the Obama Administration has since woefully neglected the plight of the many young Iranians who were subsequently jailed by the authorities as cyber dissidents.

    Dealing with the growing frustration of millions of young people, their desire for liberty, and democracy in the Middle East has to be an absolute nightmare for an Administration that came into office with an avowed policy—also known as the Obama Doctrine—of reaching out to regimes across the world no matter how repressive or obnoxious—from Iran to China, Venezuela, and Cuba. Egypt is obviously an important ally of the United States in a highly volatile region, but it certainly does not represent a democratic system, nor has it for the past 30 years. Put it all together and you have a U.S. policy characterized by lack of principle, incoherence, internal contradictions, and, more than anything, obvious confusion.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Turmoil in the Middle East, Confusion in the White House

    1. Bobbie says:

      Who knows who is who and what is what?

      Why the neglect from the U.N. and U.S., in monitoring the leadership when American tax dollars are funding it? Why can't Mubarak end his term in Sept now that it has come to a head…? all of a sudden.

      The presence of the Muslim brotherhood has been called a "minority" as if to suggest they can't cause disruption, violent or otherwise. How misleading when people become feared by them and join them. Obama needs to address in public, the Muslim brotherhood and separate them from the good people of Egypt. Obama has ties to the brotherhood and can reach out for the world to witness Obama's diplomacy with terrorists.

    2. Sean, Florida says:

      "…democracy in the Middle East has to be an absolute nightmare for an Administration that came into office with an avowed policy—also known as the Obama Doctrine—of reaching out to regimes across the world no matter how repressive or obnoxious…"

      Wow. Ouch. Yet the words ring so true.

      The most recent Republican administration can be correctly characterized as overreaching in foreign affairs. In retrospect, though, it should be seen as grabbing too much power via a Constitutionally-prescribed duty. Meanwhile, a standard Democrat administration all but ignores foreign policy, to the detriment of the citizens of the USA. Instead, the Democratic president chooses to put all eyes on the domestic side, a duty which is NOT prescribed by the Constitution. And for good reason — domestic matters are best left to the people. We, in turn, depend on our federal government to manage international affairs so that they do not harm our domestic interests.

      Unsurprisingly, President Obama has it backwards. He is grabbing power which is not his, all the while shirking his real duties as President and Commander in Chief.

    3. Pingback: Tweets that mention The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    4. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 02/02/11 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    5. Pingback: World Spinner

    6. Pingback: Political Campaign Expert » Blog Archive » Turmoil in the Middle East, Confusion in the White House | The …

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.