• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obamacare In Serious Condition

    A large number of Senators went on record tonight opposing ObamaCare.  The House spoke on a bipartisan basis on a measure to fully repeal the President’s health care law by 56 votes last month.  Just yesterday, a Florida federal court issued a decision declaring the individual mandate, and the whole law, unconstitutional.  If one of the many cases challenging the constitutionality of ObamaCare makes it to the Supreme Court, move the President’s health care reform law into critical condition.

    Tonight, the Senate voted 47-51 on an amendment to repeal ObamaCare that was offered to S. 223, the FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act.   The amendment was offered by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).  The McConnell Amendment, SA 13, would have repealed both the ObamaCare bill (P.L. 111-148) and the reconciliation measure containing provisions modifying the ObamaCare bill (P.L. 111-152).  Both laws constitute the whole of ObamaCare.

    The text of the McConnell repeal language in the amendment is below:


    (a) Job-Killing Health Care Law.–Effective as of the enactment of Public Law 111-148, such Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.
    (b) Health Care-Related Provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.–Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act are repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such title or subtitle, respectively, are restored or revived as if such title and subtitle had not been enacted.

    The Senate debate on this amendment touched on the subjects of the unconstitutional individual mandate, growing discontent with the law and massive new regulations authorized by the law.  Other Senators discussed free market alternatives to ObamaCare and the fact that companies with the best lobbyists are securing waivers for specific companies.  The debate was an excellent view into the developing arguments for a full repeal of the President’s health care law.

    Senator David Vitter (R-LA) argued that this bill is tragically flawed because at the core of this law is an unconstitutional mandate that all Americans be forced to buy a product.

    We want full repeal of Obamacare for a very simple reason: the big problems with the bill, the big problems with the plan aren’t at the margin, they’re at the core. The big problems can’t be fixed with a perfecting amendment, the changing of a comma, changing punctuation, revising one or two or five or ten sentences. The big problems are at the core of the plan, starting with the mandate from the federal government, unprecedented, that every man, woman, and child in America needs to go into the market and buy a particular product. That’s why we demand repeal.

    Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said, “we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it.” Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) responded to that point that now people are finding out what is in the bill, they don’t like it.

    Since the passage and signing of the law by President Obama, the American people are finding out something new that is in the bill that they don’t like, and as a matter of fact, it turns out that members of the House and Senate who voted for Obamacare also did not know precisely what was in the bill and certainly did not anticipate the ramifications of this massive, ill-advised law.

    Senator John Ensign (R-NV) argued that the regulations are already overburdening the American people and have exploded to over six thousand pages.

    I’ve printed off many of the regulations in the bill here before us today. Look at the size of this thing, and they’re not even close to being done writing the regulations. I challenge anybody with any company or any American to try to understand this bill and its regulations. It’s virtually impossible. It takes a team of lawyers and health care experts to even come close to understanding all the implications of this bill, according to my staff’s calculations, so far about 6,200 pages in regulations. This could go to at least 26,000 pages. I think it is safe to say the devil really is in the details with this health bill. The American people are going to learn more about the unintended consequences of this legislation as more and more of these regulations roll out.

    Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) argued for free market health care reform and discussed how Lasik eye surgery and the cost of contacts have gone down because of competition.

    With regard to the specifics of the health care bill, there are some problems in health care. As a physician, I’ve seen some of the problems. You know what the number-one complaint I got? It was the expense of health insurance, the rising expenses. The federal takeover of health care did nothing for that; in fact it has increased expenses, you see premiums rising. When you see problems there are two directions to go…You could say: do we need more government or less government? From my perspective as a physician, I saw that we already had too much government involvement in health care. I saw that what we had going on limited competition. You need more competition in health care if you want to drive prices down. You need to allow insurance to be sold across state lines. You need to allow competition in prices. One of the surgeries that I did was lasik surgery, where you correct someone’s eyes so they don’t have to wear glasses. No insurance covers it. You think maybe this body will get together and force people to buy insurance for lasik surgery? You know what? Without government getting involved competition drove the prices down on lasik. The prices were driven down because the consumer was involved. The same way with contact lenses, you can buy a contact lens for $4, maybe $3. It used to be $20 or $30. Competition works.

    Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) pointed out that the Obama Administration has doled out 733 waivers for friends of the Obama Administration.  DeMint argues that repeal would be a waiver for all Americans.

    Many Americans will lose their health plans with Obamacare, but you can keep your health care plan if your union or company got one of the 733 Obamacare waivers so far. The waivers cover almost 2.2 million people. You can get your health care or you can keep it if you’re a member of the six chapters of the Service Employees International Union who got waivers and whose political action committee spent more than $27 million helping Barack Obama get elected, or if you’re one of the 8,000 members of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union that got waivers. Their PAC spent millions in helping Obama and Democrats get elected. These are unions who supported cramming Obamacare down the throat of the rest of Americans. Even though labor unions represent less than 7% of the private work force, they have received 40% of the waivers. They don’t want the health care, they want other Americans to have it; they don’t want the health care that other Americans have to accept. Most Americans don’t play these political games. They don’t have lobbyists and PACs, but I think they should all get a waiver too. I think we should name this repeal bill that we will vote on today ‘the great American waiver.’ Every Republican in the Senate is committed to repealing this bill. Every American gets a waiver when we repeal this bill

    The House passed H.R. 2 on January 19, 2011 by a 245–189 vote.  This bill is still on the Senate’s calendar after Senator McConnell used the provisions Rule 14 to put the bill on the Senate’s calendar.  McConnell still can move to proceed to that measure at anytime during this Congress.  The vote today was not the last vote the Senate will have on a full repeal of ObamaCare.

    The judicial branch of the federal  government is having their say and two federal courts have concluded that the individual mandate within ObamaCare is unconstitutional.  Judge Roger Vinson of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida struck down ObamaCare because of the individual mandate yesterday.

    Judge Vinson wrote the following:

    It is difficult to imagine that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place. If Congress can penalize a passive individual for failing to engage in commerce, the enumeration of powers in the Constitution would have been in vain for it would be ‘difficult to perceive any limitation on federal power’ and we would have a Constitution in name only.

    Judge Vinson sided with Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming to hold that “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” is unconstitutional.

    Conn Carroll of The Foundry argues that this idea needs to be expunged from the law books.

    The United States economy, and the American people, cannot wait for the Supreme Court to render a final decision. Obamacare is not just a judicial question. It is a fundamental question about what kind of country we want to live in. Do we want an America of limited government and vibrant economic growth? Or do we want to move toward an unlimited European-style welfare state?

    Mike Franc, Vice President for Government Relations at The Heritage Foundation argues that the Obama Administration should listen to the Florida court and suspend ObamaCare.

    Now, the White House faces a simple and straightforward choice: Will President Obama abide by a decision arrived at by a federal district court judge pursuant to all applicable federal procedural niceties, or, unilaterally ignore the rule of law, as he has done in the past?

    Any way you look at the issue, ObamaCare is in serious condition with the American people, the federal judiciary and Congress.  If President Obama does not take the many legal and political challenges to his unconstitutional health care law seriously, he may force the federal Courts and the Congress to take extraordinary measures to erase ObamaCare from the Federal Code.  Hopefully cooler heads prevail on the President to do the right thing, listen to the American people, the courts and Congress – repeal ObamaCare right now.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    17 Responses to Obamacare In Serious Condition

    1. LibertyAtStake, Alex says:

      Convene the Death Panel on ObamaCare. Now means Now.

      "Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive"

    2. Bobbie says:

      Obamacare is in serious condition and so are all members of congress who refused to vote in favor of the Constitutional law of the people. Because of the serious condition this DECEIVINGLY called “affordable health care act,” is in and it's hypochondriac tendencies, along with it's pathological and chronic deception and dangerous intent, the only practical solution is to abort to end the unfair increase of costs and the over weight of contentions forced on free people currently.

      Because we are a people of good faith and dignity, we'll provide a death counseling panel for those members who cannot accept obamacare is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NOT the will of the people.

      No one should have to be concerned with those 30? 40? 50? million who chose not to have insurance and those that didn't think they should have to pay for their own. For those sincerely desperate will have to be verified as fraud on both sides of the isle has existed for quite awhile.

      It's a slap in the face when government hands out cell phones, Internet service, vehicles, houses, etc while responsible people GO WITHOUT anything outside their basic necessities so they CAN AFFORD their own HEALTH EXPENSES..

      A person's health is the person's responsibility. A child's health is the responsibility of those that brought the child into the world.

      I have myself, husband and children to be responsible for. It's unfair and unethical of government to force other peoples expenses because of their irresponsibilities, on us.

      We can depend on each other, but freedom is lost when you depend on government.

    3. Pingback: PITHOCRATES » Blog Archive » Florida Judge Finds Obamacare Unconstitutional

    4. OhioHistorian says:

      Judge Vinson was right when he talked about the law like a "watch" with all sorts of interdependent working parts. That is why repeal, rather than simply taking out a gear and calling it fixed, is needed.

      Until the Republicans quit voting with Democrat "reforms" such as the 1099 repeal that was done today, it is not dead. Republicans need to tell people that they feel their pain, but until we get rid of the bureaucracy that this law puts into place, we cannot fix the problem. And the only way to fix the bureaucracy is to repeal, not modify, the bill. Senators like Lindsey Graham need to be taken to the woodshed for cooperating on such measures.

    5. Patricia C. Mornings says:

      I read some of the comments by Republican Senators after the defeat of the repeal. "We said we would vote to repeal obamacare and we did", was one comment by Senator McConnell that truly was disappointing. I want to hear the Republicans say "this was the first of many efforts we will make from now through the 2012 election to repeal the Obama Health Care legislation that has been ruled unconstitutional". We will continue to hammer this issue and the deficit and present legislation to reduce corporate taxes to the lowest in the world, and to drill baby drill. We encourage Mr. Obama and the Democrats to join us in getting this country back on track but it is their choice. We pray that they will stop thwarting the will of the American people just as they accuse the Egyptian Government. We have all of the resources in this country and in this world to prosper, not just for the "elite" but for all.

      God Bless America

    6. George Colgrove, VA says:

      It is looking like Obamacare is in a coma and is on extended life support.

      The intent of the Commerce clause was that the federal government would ensure that the same dollar in Mass was exactly the same dollar in N Carolina. That an inch was an inch and a pound was a pound. The commerce clause was a covenant with each of the individual and independent states that they could conduct business in an open and level way. It prevents once state from having an advantage over another.

      Had the feds used the commerce clause properly, they would have beaten down the state barriers on obtaining health insurance. Moreover, the feds would not have needed to write a law for that or have a massive self-serving bureaucracy to administer it either. A simple open and transparent court case would have done the trick decades ago.

      As far as health care goes, the federal workforce has done everything it can to grow its machine against the interest of the American People. The taxpayers need not have to cover the costs of the administration of health insurance, it does not need to cover the cost of medical services period – no federal nurses, doctors, etc. This, like it or not, is a business. A business populated by thoughtful, warm hearted and kind individuals who only want to help their fellow man. People who want to perform their trade without the omnipresence of federal thugs in their corridors.

      Every time I have gone to a health center or hospital, there is more time dedicated to filing paperwork than there is to providing health care. This is wrong.

      Do we have a right to healthcare? No more than we have a right to free auto service! However, do we have the right to get a service we pay for. And we should be able to get that without federal thugs looming over us or the people providing for the service we pay for.

      As for the uninsured, believe it or not, healthcare is available – either as something to pay back over time or something that will be forgiven. Just think of the extra financial resources a hospital will have to put towards such care if they did not need to comply with a bunch of irrelevant regulations written by stuffed shirts who are only justifying their pointless and overpaid jobs from the District of Columbia. If they did not have to staff their hospitals with hundreds if not thousands of administrators handling that paperwork. Moreover they will have far more floor space for their patients if they did not have to dedicate that to file rooms and administrative offices.

      To get healthcare back on level ground, we need to remove all barriers. We need to eliminate all federal bureaucracies, departments, programs and agencies that have to do with healthcare and shift all the oversight responsibilities to the private sector and/or local state governments. We need to stop having governments and corporations (i.e. employers) provide healthcare as a benefit and let the customer go out and find their own services. This will increase competition much like is found in auto insurance. Medicare and Medicaid has to be eliminated or in some way transferred over to the private sector.

      To solve the healthcare “crisis” we simply have to get government out of it all together. Without the sluggish, wasteful and inefficient federal bureaucracy in the way, we will have more money in our pockets due to lower taxes and lower healthcare costs. We the people will contribute money to organizations that provide free healthcare to the disadvantaged. Sure, some of us wont, but that is life – get over it. People are inherently good and will do the right thing. However, you give a person power over others, and that natural kindness goes away. We have a healthcare crisis, not because of the kindhearted Americans, but because we put too much control over it in so few hands in DC.

      As for Obamacare – pull the plug.

    7. Dr. Leon W. Bleiberg says:

      Ladies and Gentlemen,

      It is imperitive that the program that I am prepared to submit to the American people is not in anway related to Obamacare nor is it just a rehash of the current failing health care policies and systems.

      It is a "fail-safe" programm, that is completely comprehensive and that requires no additional taxes and would fit the needs of both the Public and Private Sectors.

      I have difficulty in getting to present this, in its entirely, because of special interests unnecessary barriers. Its time has come, however!

      I must be contacted by the right people to go further with it and present it in its proper details and comprehensiveness.


    8. Eric Miklas, North E says:

      The Obama Adminstration is ignoring the Judicial Branch of Government. There HAS to be something that can be done about this! We have NEVER in our history as a country, had a President that simply ignores HIS OWN COUNTRY'S Rule of Law!

    9. Jill-Maine says:

      How does this president get away with all this? How come he still has popularity. Why are Americans so stupid. He should pay attention to what is going on in the middle east. I can see the same thing happening here once people wake up.

    10. tom hancy says:

      Well here we go again. We see him on TV wanting to help america get back on track create jobs etc.etc.then why does he stop the train in the middle of the road.Just so he can make his point to let evreyone he still imprortant or thinks he is.. If he was TRULY AMERICAN he would try to help this situation out at least see what opitons that are there.. Yes they may not be what he or what we want but at least look and LISTEN what the AMERICAN people have to say. This health bill is BAD FOR AMERICA and this bone of a Prisident is not going to help america out. So out with you Obama.

    11. Spiritof76, NH says:

      The twenty-six states should now force a contempt of court ruling against the thuggish administration. They should declare that the Obamacare is null and void, just like the AG from Wisconsin declared. They should all state unanimously that the federal grovernment was formed with the consent of the states and the people and that consent is withdrawn in this case.

    12. Anna says:

      The ruling by Roger Vinson, the silence by the Obama Administration, and their vilification of Vinson reveals once again their contempt for the democratic process when it involves what they selfishly want. Of course, by now it must be obvious his words and action do not connect.

    13. Gilbert Searcy, Jr. says:

      Great Article!! Very nice summary of the mess we are in.

    14. Pingback: World Spinner

    15. Pingback: House and Senate Cloakroom Report: February 7th-11th | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    16. Pingback: House and Senate Cloakroom Report: February 7th-11th | Big Propaganda

    17. Pingback: House and Senate Cloakroom Report: February 7th-11th | The Conservative Papers

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.