• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Skinning the Cap-and-Trade Cat with Clean Energy Standards

    Speaking before a new Congress in his State of the Union address, President Obama gave an alternative suggestion for Congress now that cap and trade is out of the picture. He pitched an aggressive clean energy standard, saying he wants 80 percent of our electricity to come from carbon-free sources of energy by 2035.

    For reference, the Energy Information Administration shows that carbon-free sources generated 31 percent of our total electricity in 2009 (20 percent nuclear, 7 percent hydroelectric, and 4 percent other renewables). As Kim Strassel points out in today’s Wall Street Journal, a clean energy standard is cap and trade without the carbon revenue:

    It’s also cap and trade by another name. Consider: The goal of cap and trade is to impose crushing taxes on fossil fuels—oil, coal, natural gas—thereby forcing utilities to switch to costly renewables. Under Mr. Obama’s new proposal, the government skips the tax part and outright requires the use of costly renewables. The result is the same: dramatically higher energy prices, from carbon-free sources. Now you know why even climate warrior John Kerry was so sanguine about the president’s failure to say “climate change” in his speech. “I’m very sympathetic,” said the Massachusetts senator, who clearly got the strategy memo.

    A clean energy standard forces Americans to use more expensive energy sources. If these energy sources were cost-competitive, they would not need a government-guaranteed share of the electricity market.

    A clean energy standard is less onerous than a renewable electricity standard—which mandates that a predetermined percentage of electricity must come from government-selected energy—but including nuclear and clean-coal lures increases the probability of passage and also increases the grab bag of special interests. Strassel explains that President Obama will “lure Republicans into negotiations, then cement their support with lavish energy pork for their home-state nuclear, clean-coal, wind, biofuels and solar projects. As a bonus, the plan gives cover to nervous coal state Democrats.”

    President Obama’s contradictory remarks in his State of the Union demonstrate the economic impracticality of a clean energy standard. He first (correctly) said, “None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from.” This is the beauty of the market. The President pointed to the importance of innovation in creating cars, planes, the Internet, Facebook, and Google.

    Minute later, however, when discussing a clean energy standard, President Obama remarked, “Now, clean energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean energy jobs if businesses know there will be a market for what they’re selling.” Guaranteed shares in the marketplace remove the process of innovation the President praised earlier in his speech.

    A clean energy standard may reward certain energy producers in the short term but will hurt both producers and consumers in the long run because it eliminates competition, reduces the incentives to lower costs, and encourages government dependence. Political winners are market losers, and it’s the consumer who suffers.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Skinning the Cap-and-Trade Cat with Clean Energy Standards

    1. Bobbie says:

      "this is the beauty of the market" He didn't specify "free." Please don't give into the presidents bribes and black mail. Pork is an unnecessary, indirect sacrifice that America's diet is eliminated from. Remember clean energy standards that reflect man-made global warming fraud, is corruption. What the president is doing, circles around his "special interests." And his "special interests" are not the interests of America and most Americans.

      Run the government the way it was intended, so we can create the jobs. Thank you!

    2. Pingback: World Spinner

    3. Pingback: Commentary: Study on “Clean” Jobs Calls For Expanded Government Role | Louisiana News

    4. Pingback: Commentary: Study on “Clean” Jobs Calls For Expanded Government Role : Greener Energy Buys

    5. Pingback: Commentary: Study on “Clean” Jobs Calls For Expanded Government Role : Get Greener Energy

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.