• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Congress Must Now Address Civil Justice Reform to Impact Health Care

    Democrats profess great concern about the health care issue. Yet they avoided including any form of medical malpractice reform when passing their major health care legislation in 2010. This despite the fact that abusive tort litigation is one of the driving forces in the high cost of health care.

    Such litigation greatly increases malpractice-insurance costs, to the point where yearly premiums can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in some medical specialties. This not only raises the cost of health care, it actually drives providers out of business and decreases access to quality health care. Liability risks are also a major factor in the costs of developing and manufacturing new drugs and medical devices.

    The direct costs of medical tort claims and medical malpractice insurance does not take into account the even larger cost of “defensive medicine.” An overwhelming majority of doctors admit practicing defensive medicine – ordering tests and treatments that are medically unnecessary but that protect them from litigation. Those costs are upwards of $200 billion a year, according to the Pacific Research Institute and PricewaterhouseCoopers. A CBO report requested by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) admitted that medical malpractice reform could save $54 billion for the U.S. government alone.

    Tort law is normally an issue that state legislatures (like Texas and Mississippi) deal with by implementing the measures that have proven effective in eliminating abusive litigation, improving the conditions for medical practice, and protecting both their citizens and their local doctors. These include reasonable caps on noneconomic (and unprovable) damages like “pain and suffering,” limits on attorney contingency fees, a requirement of intentional, knowing, and malicious conduct before punitive damages can be awarded (and caps on punitive damages that are a multiple of actual damages), and limiting liability for a specific medical provider to his proportional share of responsibility.

    But there is a federal dimension. Much of health care costs these days are paid through federal programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. So, the federal government also has a stake in reforming health care liability laws. Congress could implement such requirements by conditioning federal funding for Medicaid or SCHIP on states implementing such reform for medical providers in those federal programs.

    Congress also has an interest in making sure that greedy tort lawyers who are constantly trying to game the system fail to convince state courts to get around federal preemption in areas where the federal government has exercised its authority for good reason. For example, Congress should make it clear that medical providers (and manufacturers) cannot be sued for injuries caused by products approved, cleared and licensed by the FDA for the purposes for which the products have been used. The development of numerous medical devices and new drugs has prolonged life and improved the health of suffering individuals over the past 75 years, and such innovation depends on a regulatory environment that protects the public without unneeded and unfair complexity and liability risk

    Similarly, Congress should make it clear that the federal vaccine injury law that was passed in the 1980s preempts state tort actions. While immunization prevents large numbers of individuals from contracting a particular disease, it is a medical certainty that a small number of individuals will have an adverse reaction no matter how well a vaccine is designed and manufactured. State tort lawsuits were driving vaccine makers out of business before the passage of the federal vaccine law, threatening to eliminate vital vaccines that are essential to the health of America’s children. Now, new state tort actions are threatening vaccine makers again.

    The bottom line is that any proposed reforms to our health care system that do not include medical malpractice and other liability reforms cannot be taken seriously. The number-one priority for lawmakers has to be the liability risks for doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers that are increasing the cost of health care, decreasing access to quality services and products, and driving providers out of business. It’s crucial to protecting and maintaining a system that delivers the best quality of health care to consumers, bar none, in the world.

    Cross-posted at Health Reform Report.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    15 Responses to Congress Must Now Address Civil Justice Reform to Impact Health Care

    1. West Texan says:

      All part of the social progressives' redistribution of wealth agenda. It's phony state capitalism. The type that courts like minded ideologues at a state dinner party.

    2. David Brunjes Lake F says:

      As a small business owner, I concur. More specifically, I believe that the United States needs to move to a "loser pay" system where civil lawsuits are involved – just like the rest of the world. It is time to break the stranglehold the lawyers have on this country.

    3. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 1/20/11 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    4. Pingback: Tweets that mention Congress Must Now Address Civil Justice Reform to Impact Health Care | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    5. Bobbie says:

      Sounds like democrats on the move, were hoping this wouldn't be noticed, which exposes their promotion of malpractice and demotion of human protection.

    6. Academic says:

      Reliable studies consistently show the following: the percentage of healthcare expensives related to medical malpractice awards or insurance makes up a tiny fraction (0.5%) of healtchare dollars; that percentage continues to shrink; the majority of awards are tied to a very small number of docs, who appear to be the "rotten apples" that every barrel contains. In the meantime, the argument presented here does not factor in the healthcare costs–which would be borne by the public–if those doctors were not held accountable, and injuried patients only had social security disability, medicare, or emergency rooms.

    7. Gabriel says:


      Did you know that america is ranked #1 in fruad and waste in the healthcare system against all other industralized countries in the world? Do you not know the facts?

    8. Bobbie says:

      I know the fact government infiltration increased the fraud and corruption and waste, Gabriel. Did you? I know government is your hero but the government is run by people who aren't heroic for the better of all, at all.

    9. Gabriel says:


      How can government be the problem with our Heathcare system when over 90% of the healthcare system in free market based? Is it impossible for the private sector healthcare system which is over 90% of the entire healthcare system in the U.S. to have fruad and waste? Is the private sector perfect? You still did not answer my question. Did you know that america is ranked #1 in fruad and waste in the healthcare system against all other industralized countries in the world? Do you not know the facts?

      Stop deflecting because it doesn't help your argument. waiting…

    10. Bobbie says:

      You're ridiculous Gabriel! And I will call you what you are. Another admittance of yours, that government hasn't been doing their job to oversee your claims of waste and fraud. There is no free market based insurance. There never was in my life time. Stop distorting the issue, Gabriel. You need to get help with that mental illness.

    11. Gabriel says:

      numerical facts are fun :)

    12. Marc says:

      As soon as you comment that someone needs help for a mental illness based on their views, anything you've said that held any merit went out the window.

    13. Bobbie says:

      I apologize Marc, but you haven''t been attacked by this person for the past few months. It's not this person's views, it's the refusal of his of anyone elses. Gabriel interrogates every comment I make. Maybe obsession is better, but help is needed…

    14. Gabriel says:

      haha, sure Bobbie sure. and you never attack others that have a different viewpoint. sure..

    15. Razia says:

      I think health care can't be fixed without including strong reform for medical malpractice. I don't think caps are the answer though. Caps are used because it tends to provide immediate relief to medical malpractice insurance rates. Caps don't adequately compensate patients who are injured, especially severely injured. Congress needs to act on reform, however it needs to come up with reform that makes sense for patients and for doctors. Hard to say if this is all talk or if they are serious.


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.