• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Ambassadorial High Jinks: Will Obama Cave on Venezuela?

    During the month of December, Venezuela’s authoritarian populist president actively used a lame duck legislature to expand his already unchecked executive power, culminating in a December 17 grant of “broad powers to enact laws by decree for a year and a half.” He did this before a new legislative body with a significant opposition presence took office on January 5.

    While undertaking the power grab, Chavez continued to bait the U.S. by saying he would not accept nominated envoy Larry Palmer, whose critical comments regarding Chavez’s support for terrorism and politicized military drew the repeated ire of the Venezuelan president. On December 20, the Venezuelan government formally rejected Palmer, switching off the diplomatic green light it gave in early 2010.

    The State Department, which previously vowed to stand behind Palmer, made public on December 29 that it was canceling the visa of Venezuela’s Ambassador to the U.S. Bernardo Alvarez. This was a milder course than expelling Alvarez by declaring him persona non grata, as Chavez did in 2008 to Patrick Duddy, the U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela.

    However, on January 1, a mood change seemed to occur. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton beamed before the cameras as she shook hands with Chavez at the inauguration of Brazil’s new president. On January 4, the State Department’s Teflon-like spokesman P. J. Crowley seemed to indicate that the Obama Administration planned to move ahead with nominating a replacement for Palmer, one more palatable to Chavez’s taste.

    Chavez savored his victory and farcically suggested that President Obama select Oliver Stone, Sean Penn, or radical professor Noam Chomsky—all Chavez sycophants—to serve as the next U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela.

    On January 5, the State Department spokesman rushed to clarify the issue: “We are not looking for another candidate to be the U.S. Ambassador to Caracas. We’ve made clear that we felt very strongly that Larry Palmer was the appropriate candidate, fully qualified, and would have been and would be an effective interlocutor to improve relations between the United States and Venezuela. We have not changed our view, even though his nomination is technically expired.”

    As the pull and tug continues between appeasers and the tough-minded, The Washington Post acerbically noted, will the next nominee speak the truth about Venezuela, or will he submit to Chavez’s standing gag order?

    Advised former U.S. Ambassador Richard Williamson, “Chávez’s recent round of repressive actions should be a wake-up call. It is not too late. The U.S. should provide leadership in the Western Hemisphere and principled support for democracy and human rights in Venezuela.”

    Added blogger Liz Harper, “Chávez is antithetical to our democratic values and security concerns. He is moving full steam down the field, while we sit on the sidelines.”

    Moving to select a new Ambassador to Venezuela in the near term will not advance U.S. interests in Venezuela and sends a strong signal of inconsistency and complacency in U.S. policy toward Chavez and all he represents. On the diplomatic front, Chavez believes he has the Obama Administration on a short leash, and he wants to keep it there.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Ambassadorial High Jinks: Will Obama Cave on Venezuela?

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    2. Chris Herz says:

      The most interesting thing about Wikileaks has been its exposure of the second-raters and the group-think in the official Washington of which you are so much a part.

      Why can't we here in the USA forget this militarism and subversion which is such an automatic reflex in our policy establishments? Especially vis-a-vis Latin America. Seems to me that all Hugo Chavez Frias and his associates want is a modicum of respect for the independence of their country.

      Instead we should focus upon our unparalleled inventiveness and productivity to deal with Venezuela or any other country. Even Germany and the other former imperial powers of Europe have discovered, much to their profit, that a Volkswagen could go places never accessible to the Panzers.

      What then would be more natural than that Venezuela or any of our other neighbors would trade and treat with us upon the basis of mutual respect and equity, to their profit and ours?

      I ask this of your author as a perfectly respectful and serious question.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×