• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A New Year and a New Direction for Health Care Reform

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act became the law of the land in 2010, but debate over its existence and implementation will rage on in the New Year.  The law’s serious policy flaws are already impacting health insurance and costs, but these are part of a deeper and broader issue: the proper role for the federal government in Americans’ health care.  The public’s stance on this issue has been anything but settled in the wake of the new law’s passage.

    As ramifications of Obamacare continue to play out, it becomes clearer that the changes made are the wrong ones. The new law cuts $575 billion from Medicare, but uses the savings to fund a new health entitlement, rather than deal with the financial insolvency that Medicare faces. “Bending the cost curve” was one of Obamacare’s original goals, but Medicare’s actuary reports that while the the new law indeed bends the curve, it is in the wrong direction: up, not down.

    Furthermore, countless employers have said Obamacare accelerated increases in their health insurance premiums, prompting them to consider dropping coverage or pass more of the cost onto employees and their families. Mandates and new regulations are likely to further inhibit businesses’ ability to offer health insurance to employees, and also threaten to negatively affect the economy at large. Finally, when the law comes fully online and the true costs are accounted for, Obamacare is expected to significantly increase the nation’s deficit spending.

    But the debate extends beyond these policy errors and into the realm of the federal government’s rightful role in health care. Obamacare significantly increases Washington’s influence over every aspect of the U.S. health care system—not just in the insurance market, but right down to the patient’s bedside. Medicare beneficiaries will be especially affected by the creation of new bureaucratic entities and top-down, cost-containing mechanisms included in the law.

    Meanwhile, Americans continue to oppose parts or all of the new health reform law. Pollsters like Rasmussen show that Americans’ support for repealing Obamacare has ranged from 50 percent to 63 percent since the law’s passage.  In November, American voters chose to send a wave of new lawmakers to Congress, many of whom campaigned in support of repealing the law.  The provisions in Obamacare are not consistent with what Americans want, strengthening the case for repeal and a new direction for health care reform.

    So what’s the alternative? Reform should transform the health care system to strengthen individuals’ control over their health care spending and decision-making. Patients, including those covered by Medicare and Medicaid, should have the opportunity to choose health care plans in the private insurance market that best suit their needs.

    Market-based reforms would foster greater competition among insurers and more choices for consumers, enabling them to seek out the best value for their dollar.  This bottom-up approach to reducing health care costs would maintain the quality of care available in the United States.  It would put doctors and patients, not Washington bureaucrats, in charge of decisions relating to individuals’ care.

    As the conversation continues, plans that embody these principles are gaining greater traction.  U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan’s “Roadmap for America’s Future” would drastically change Medicare, Medicaid, and the health care system at large, to put patients in the driver’s seat.  Ryan and Alice Rivlin, both members of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, together offered a similar plan for Medicare and Medicaid that would replace the highly centralized, bureaucratic system with a defined-contribution program, offering beneficiaries greater autonomy.

    In 2011, repeal must remain a priority for the new Congress, not only to undo the disastrous consequences of Obamacare, but as the first step to reform that will fix the health care system in ways that empower patients, not bureaucrats.

    A version of this article was cross-posted at American Health Line here.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to A New Year and a New Direction for Health Care Reform

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention The Foundry A New Year and a New Direction for Health Care Reform #tcot #tlot -- Topsy.com

    2. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 12/31/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    3. Pingback: Tweets that mention A New Year and a New Direction for Health Care Reform: The Patient Protection and Affordabl... -- Topsy.com

    4. kimkey says:

      I was told by a friend that something called "Wise Health Insurance" is offering health insurance plans starting just $1 a day. That is some thing we all can agree.

    5. kimkey says:

      The first new rule says you HAVE to have insurance. Both my husband and I have pre-existing conditions, and although the new bill says we can't be denied coverage because of it. So far, the cheapest health insurance we've been able to find is called "Wise Health Insurance" search for it online if you are pre-existing conditions.

    6. Jill, California says:

      My health insurance premiums have "necessarily skyrocketed" every billing cycle since Obamacare passed. Obama has deliberately harmed every person who already had insurance.

    7. Chuck , Searcy Ar. says:

      I have had health insurance for me and my family since my kids was born , 40 years ago now, my ins,. co. is Blue Cross and this year it has gone from $285 per mo. to $480, I havent used it other than the flu that I had the last two years and my wife has used it for mamograms once a year. If this is what he meant by more affordable, I am tryiing to subtract my cost now from my previous cost to find out my savings, I guess I am gonna have to get a damn democrat to figure it out, I sure as hell cant

    8. Marty Pants says:

      I would honestly be willing to never see another doctor in my life than to have Obamacare foisted on the nation, my children and grandchildren. I don't want anything free from the government. I want Obama and his vision of a changed America gone.

      As I've looked around our country and considered all that Americans are proud of and hold dear, I realize that all of those things are foreign to Obama. In fact he despises them. It will not be easy. Overcoming every other American enemy has not been easy, but as we've overcome all of her other enemies, we shall overcome Obama too.

    9. DAVID SUNKLE WICKENB says:

      YES, THIS ENTIRE NEW BURICRATIC HEALTH CARE HAS TO BE REPEALED. WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE LOOSING ALL CONTROL OF OUR OWN HEALTH CARE. THIS BILL WAS PASSED WITH-OUT EVEN BEING READ.! (DAH). THEY EXEMPTED THEM SELVES AND NUMEROUS OTHERS FROM THE BILL.? THAT ALONE SHOULD SAY SOMETHING. IF IT IS SO GREAT: THEN ALL OF WASHINGTON SHOULD SHOULD HAVE TO ACCEPT IT AND BECOME PART OF IT. EVERYTHING THEY ARE TRYING TO PASS FOR THE AMERICAM PEOPLE DOES NOT APPLY TO THEM.? TAKE AWAY THEIR PERK'S. PUT THEM ALL ON SOCIAL/ SECURITY LIKE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE. SET TERM LIMITS; NO MORE RETIREMENT'S. LET THEM TRY AND LIVE LIKE THE REST OF AMERICA. TAKE AWAY THEIR CARS,PAY FOR THEIR OWN GASOLINE AND THEIR FLIGHTS AND VACATION'S. NO MORE EARMARK'S AND/OR PERKS.

    10. Bobbie says:

      Thanks for the heads up, Kimkey!

      Obama"s health care reform has nothing to do with reform. Obama's health care is TAKEOVER! It is corrupt, it is frivolous, it is dangerous, it is punishment, it is wasteful AND IT'S UNFAIR!

      Remember the president takes full credit for this coercion now known as a piece of destruction to America.

      Please untie our hands!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×