• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Rocket Modernization Roadmap Needed Before New START Vote

    It is an obligation of the Congress to make sure that the United States will focus more on preservation of its strategic triad, especially its submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Maintaining the triad has been essential to the efficacy of the U.S. strategic deterrent for decades. A healthy solid rocket motor industrial base is the bedrock for the U.S. ICBM and SLBM force. For all these reasons, it would be wise for the Senate to consider an amendment to require the Obama Administration to submit a roadmap for preserving the nation’s solid rocket motors industrial base prior to the ratification and entry into force of New START, a bilateral arms control agreement with Russia.

    The U.S. solid rocket industrial base is being jeopardized—in part by the lack of commitment on the part of the Obama Administration to modernize the strategic missile forces of the U.S. This uncertainty stems from a lack of clarity with regard to future plans to develop nuclear and non-nuclear strategic weapons, the latter of which are referred to as Prompt Global Strike. The average age of a Minuteman III ICBM is 40 years, and the average age of Trident II D-5 SLBM is 20 years. It is imperative for the Congress to maintain effective strategic missile forces indefinitely.

    In addition, being the most dependent on the use of space, the U.S. needs to preserve its military, civilian, and commercial space capabilities. Among other steps, the need to develop, acquire, and operate space systems to support national security, ensure the survivable national security space systems and networks, reinvigorate the national security space industrial base, improve “mission assurance” for national security space, develop “space situational awareness” capabilities, and respond to changes in the threat environment is essential.

    Accordingly, the Senate should consider an amendment to the resolution of ratification to New START. Such an amendment would require the Obama Administration to produce a roadmap outlining the production of SLBMs and ICBMs, which comprise two-thirds of the U.S. strategic triad, in a way that preserves the U.S. solid rocket industrial base.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Rocket Modernization Roadmap Needed Before New START Vote

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Rocket Modernization Roadmap Needed Before New START Vote | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    2. Jon Oldfather says:

      Your article seems to imply that the age of the missiles in our nuclear arsenal raises questions about their efficacy. Any system, properly maintained and monitored, will perform properly. The laws of physics require it.

      The US has too many missiles in its arsenal now. They are a headache to either be maintained (no one knows why) or abandoned. Solid rocket boosters will be around, hopefully for space launches and not to carry nukes around. START is the best way to get rid of some of our excess warheads and delivery systems in an orderly and bilateral manner. To hold the treaty hostage in order to protect the solid rocket industry is absurd and shows a dangerous bias for a mostly useless, dangerous, and politically damaging nuclear arsenal and its entitled adherents at the DOE. If you want to advocate for a space industry I am with you, but to advocate the delay of a badly needed nuclear arms treaty to support the solid rocket industry is a poor argument.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.