• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Outside the Beltway: Zoning Czars Use Business Permits to Censor Art

    At a time when the economy is slow, you might think government officials would be happy to see new businesses start up. Arlington County Virginia, however, isn’t as welcoming as it could be. Whatever you do, don’t start a business there and decorate the exterior of your establishment with artwork relating to your business. If you do, Arlington’s zoning officials will probably be along to harass you.

    Kim Houghton, owner of Wag More Dogs, can tell you all about Arlington’s zoning administrators. With the help of the Institute for Justice, Houghton has filed a lawsuit against the county for demanding that she trade her First Amendment rights in exchange for permission to open a business.

    Earlier this year, while preparing to open her dog daycare, boarding, and grooming business, Houghton commissioned a $4,000 mural to be painted on the back of her building, which borders a community dog park. Naturally, the mural depicts dogs at play. Before Houghton could open her doors, however, the county told her she wouldn’t receive the permits she needed unless she covered up the mural. The mural, said the county, was a commercial sign that was too big according to its regulations. The county even sent her instructions specifying the kind of paint she must use or alternatively how a tarp covering the mural must be secured.

    The mural, keep in mind, has no words on it—just pictures of cartoon dogs, paw prints, and bones. And these pictures of cartoon dogs, paw prints, and bones cover up what had been an ugly cinderblock wall at the back of Houghton’s business overlooking a dog park.

    That’s what Arlington County officials care about.

    One county zoning official sent Houghton an e-mail telling her that her mural could depict “anything … EXCEPT something to do with dogs, bones, paw prints, pets, people walking their dogs, etc.” Anything that relates to the business transforms the artwork into a commercial sign that can be regulated, according to the county.

    So, if your business serves dogs, you can paint dragons on your building but not dogs. And, presumably, if you retail in exotic pets, you could paint dogs on your facade, but not dragons. Does that make sense? Isn’t banning some speech but not other speech (as opposed to regulating time, manner, and place) contrary to the First Amendment?

    In fact, the mural had been up for four months before the county said it had a problem with the artwork—just before Houghton planned to open her business. The county eventually offered Houghton what it considered a reasonable compromise: She could leave the mural in place if she painted on top of it the words, “Welcome to Shirlington Park’s Community Canine Area,” in four-foot high lettering. To the county then, a mural that is a nuisance when displayed by a private citizen becomes perfectly acceptable if the government can make the artwork its own. Shouldn’t that tell us something about whether there’s really a valid government interest in regulating this form of expression?

    The Institute for Justice’s lawsuit contends that, because Arlington’s sign laws require zoning administrators to inspect artwork in order to determine what the message of the artwork is, they constitute a content-based restriction on free speech that is impermissible under the First Amendment. The Institute for Justice also contends that because the laws are so vague, they allow selective and discriminatory enforcement, which has a chilling effect on free speech.

    Houghton had the guts to follow her passion for dogs and start a business. But rather than thank her for adding to the economy, the county government has asked her to trade away her constitutional right of free speech. Fortunately, IJ is in her corner. Writing in the Washington Times, Houghton says: “If it weren’t for IJ, I would have had to give in because zoning officials are that intimidating and that powerful. Arlington County officials have the power to close my doors forever at their whim, and they have shown they are not shy about using that power.”

    Hopefully, with IJ’s help, Houghton will be able to tear down that ugly blue tarp covering her mural.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Outside the Beltway: Zoning Czars Use Business Permits to Censor Art

    1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Outside the Beltway: Zoning Czars Use Business Permits to Censor Art | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    2. Pragmatic in Texas says:

      For the life of me, I can't figure out why 20% of the population of this country believe that a totalitarian form of government is better than our current system.

      They see example after example of what a totalitarian regime can do, like what is happening with Ms. Houghton. Do they not see that they are not immune to a repressive government?

      God help us all if freedom loving Americans give up the fight for our Constitution.

    3. R Holland, Chandler, says:

      Big government running wild.

    4. J Web says:

      "you might think government officials would be happy to see new businesses start up. "

      America, please stop thinking that government officals are trying to have the same ideals as the general public. We the People have been under attack for about a hundred years. The eltites have waged war and now we starting to wake up?…check mate…we must turn back to God through Jesus Christ and pray for boldness and leadership while returning to our national foundation. But in all the confusion, memorize Revelations 17:14…These (the New World Order/Devil's messiah) shall make war with the Lamb (Christ Jesus), and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him (you are cordially invited) are called (He is calling YOU), and chosen (He has chosen you, will you choose Him now), and faithful.

      Life doesn't end with America…please join his kingdom and then STAND your ground together.

    5. Ace Sez Bishop, Cali says:

      Some ppl that run for local community gov't are egotistical fat heads and so full of themselves they are totally repugnant–and consequently next to impossible to govern with common sense–its all about them as individuals–their arrogance knows no bounds–City councils/ school boards /Zoning commissions etc suffer from these kinds of sick personalities.

      California's Coastal Commission is a terrible example of crazies with power !!

    6. Leon Lundquist, Dura says:

      Here is one of a thousand possible examples of the HEART part, where Government breaks American hearts. The point is to turn Americans against their own Government (a plan in the Foreign Interest). The local Governments are bound by the Constitution, they cannot harm this business person with Dictatorship at the local level. Don't look now but our local Governments are rife with crazy liberal bureaucrats just like the Federal Government. The question I'd like Heritage's Institute For Justice to ask is "Is it lawful Constitutionally for local Government to conspire to violate the Constitutional Rights Of Americans?" I say they are violating these Rights intentionally and knowingly because everybody knows this is a Free Speech violation but the local Government does it anyway!

      It is about going after Americans! It is about the Government attacking Americans! It is intentional! It is planned! It is orchestrated! I don't want to hear any more of this "Oops!" jazz. These are criminals. The chickens are organized! We are going to hear a lot more of these stories and the Captive Media is going to use it for cover! As the Captive Media does their part of the HEART part, bring the Government down (that's the plan,) they will be heroes! Fake heroes because nobody will remember how their 80% Media Bias put a Communist Government in the White House. The whole point of the HEART part is to bring down the American Government as a Representative Constitutional Democracy and replace it with European National Socialism! Puke!

    7. Alexander says:

      Commercial speech should of course be free. One small point, though: Wag More Dogs is located near, but inside, the Beltway (Google Maps).

    8. Spiritof76, NH says:

      Welcome to the United States of Socialist Republic- USSR. The local commissars are enforcing cultural revolution and solidarity!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×