- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Morning Bell: Another Victory on the Road to Repeal

Posted By Conn Carroll On December 14, 2010 @ 9:17 am In Obamacare | Comments Disabled

“The unchecked expansion of congressional power to the limits suggested by the Minimum Essential Coverage Provision would invite unbridled exercise of federal police powers. At its core, this dispute is not simply about regulating the business of insurance—or crafting a scheme of universal health insurance coverage—it’s about an individual’s right to choose to participate.” So wrote Judge Henry Hudson of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia yesterday in striking down Obamacare’s individual mandate. Specifically, Judge Hudson found that Section 1501 of the act, which forces all Americans to buy government approved health insurance policies, “exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article 1.”

The White House and their leftist allies were quick to try and minimize this body blow to Obamacare, arguing [1] that 14 previous court challenges have been dismissed by the courts. This desperate spin doesn’t even pass the laugh test. The 42-page decision is the first by a federal court this far along the litigation process [2] and the first brought by a state (the case was filed by Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli). And soon Judge Roger Vinson of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida is expected to rule on an even larger challenge to Obamacare [3] brought by 16 state attorneys general, four governors, two private citizens, and the National Federation of Independent Business.

In an early stage of that litigation, Judge Vinson wrote [4]: “The individual mandate applies across the board. People have no choice and there is no way to avoid it. Those who fall under the individual mandate either comply with it, or they are penalized. It is not based on an activity that they make the choice to undertake. Rather, it is based solely on citizenship and on being alive.”

Judge Hudson used very similar reasoning in rejecting the Obama Administration’s claim that since “every individual in the United States will require health care at some point in their lifetime” the federal government has the power to force Americans to buy health insurance now. Hudson writes: “Of course, the same reasoning could apply to transportation, housing, or nutritional decisions. This broad definition of the economic activity subject to congressional regulation lacks logical limitation and is unsupported by Commerce Clause jurisprudence.”

Judge Hudson then moved on to the Obama Administration’s claim that the individual mandate was actually a tax that would therefore make it constitutional under the General Welfare Clause. Hudson wrote [5]: “This Court’s analysis begins with the unequivocal denials by the Executive and Legislative branches that the [individual mandate] was a tax.” It was only when the Administration found itself before a judge, not in front of voters, that the White House conveniently shifted its rationale. Judge Hudson saw through this deception, identified the individual mandate as the penalty it is, and rejected the Obama Administration’s mandate-as-tax claim.

It was not a total victory for Cuccinelli, however. Judge Hudson rejected Virginia’s request to strike down the entire law. Despite claims by the President himself, and authors of the legislation like Senator Max Baucus (D–MT), Judge Hudson found that the Section 1501 was “severable” from the rest of the law and voided only that section and “directly-dependent provisions which make specific reference to 1501.” Judge Vinson, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court will all be free to revisit this issue.

But whether or not courts will invalidate just Obamacare’s individual mandate is rapidly becoming irrelevant. Obamacare simply may not survive that long. It is already collapsing under its own financial and bureaucratic weight. Just last week, Congress voted to stop reductions in Medicare payments to doctors by raiding future revenues from Obamacare’s insurance subsidy program [6]. The number of waivers [7] the Obama Administration has to grant from Obamacare’s unworkable regulations grows each day. Doctors are telling pollsters they will leave the medical profession in droves if Obamacare is implemented as planned by 2014 [8]. And according to the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll [9] Obamacare is now more unpopular than ever, with only 43 percent approving the law and 52 percent opposed.

Obamacare will be repealed. It is only a question of when.

Quick Hits:

  • At the signing ceremony for the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, First Lady Michelle Obama said of deciding what American children should eat: “We can’t just leave it up to the parents. [10]
  • With yesterday’s Senate vote in favor of the Obama tax deal, our entire tax code is becoming temporary [11].
  • According to Gallup [12], one in three Britons would like to leave the United Kingdom.
  • A new report from the Congressional Oversight Panel for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) finds that the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) is likely to fulfill less than a third [13] of its goal.
  • More than just a voluntary earmark ban is needed to cut spending and corruption [14] in Washington.

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2010/12/14/morning-bell-another-victory-on-the-road-to-repeal-2/

URLs in this post:

[1] arguing: http://m.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/12/08/health-reform-wins-another-round-court

[2] the first by a federal court this far along the litigation process: http://blog.heritage.org../2010/12/13/judge-rules-obamacare-mandate-goes-beyond-letter-and-spirit-of-the-constitution/

[3] an even larger challenge to Obamacare: http://blog.heritage.org../2010/10/15/morning-bell-a-legal-victory-on-the-road-to-repeal/

[4] wrote: http://www.politico.com/static/PPM152_101014_order.html

[5] wrote: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3174287/Opinion.pdf

[6] Congress voted to stop reductions in Medicare payments to doctors by raiding future revenues from Obamacare’s insurance subsidy program: http://blog.heritage.org../2010/12/07/doctors-avoid-medicare-pay-cut-for-another-year%E2%80%94but-then-what/

[7] number of waivers: http://blog.heritage.org../2010/12/10/side-effects-number-of-waivers-grows-as-a-result-of-obamacare-authors%E2%80%99-sloppy-handiwork/

[8] Doctors are telling pollsters they will leave the medical profession in droves if Obamacare is implemented as planned by 2014: http://blog.heritage.org../2010/12/07/side-effects-what-doctors-have-to-say-about-obamacare/

[9] the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2010/12/new-low-in-support-for-health-care-reform.html

[10] We can’t just leave it up to the parents.: http://blog.heritage.org http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michelle-obama-45-billion-child-nutritio

[11] tax code is becoming temporary: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703963704576005960558986604.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

[12] Gallup: http://www.gallup.com/poll/145208/One-Three-Britons-Leave.aspx

[13] less than a third: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-14/u-s-foreclosure-prevention-program-to-fall-short-watchdog-panel-finds.html

[14] cut spending and corruption: http://www.foundry.org/2010/12/13/a-voluntary-earmark-ban-is-only-half-the-battle/

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.