• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Breaking Health Care Research: A New Way Forward in Medicare Reform

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) will impact every corner of the health care system, especially Medicare. Unfortunately, the new law speeds the program’s travel in the wrong direction by building upon existing problems and creating new ones. There’s a better way to restore Medicare, as Heritage’s Robert E. Moffit, Ph.D., and James Capretta outline in recent research.

    Obamacare makes $575 billion in cuts to Medicare and increases bureaucratic micromanagement of seniors’ care. If history is any indicator, this will be a failed attempt to increase efficiency. Moreover, the legislation will not solve existing issues, such as seniors’ decreasing access to health services or geographically disparate quality of care.

    Alternatively, Moffit and Capretta suggest reforming Medicare into a premium support system:

    Premium support would give future Medicare patients control over the flow of Medicare dollars and decisions, guarantee personal choice of health plans, and let them secure the best value for the money. This is the kind of consumer choice model that federal workers and retirees in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) enjoy. It is a popular and successful approach because it emphasizes personal choice among plans, and government oversight ensures consumer protection and transparency.

    Medicare currently faces $30.8 trillion in long-term unfunded obligations. Moffit and Capretta propose placing Medicare on a long-term budget based on the expected growth in medical costs and number of enrollees. Premium contributions would be set at a default of 90 percent of the weighted average premium in each region, but if payments were in excess of the budget, they would be nominally reduced to ensure solvency. “The combination of competitive bidding with a limit on the government’s contribution should provide powerful incentives for cost-cutting throughout the health sector,” they write. Moreover, premium support would be means-tested so that those who could afford to cover a greater portion of their premiums would do so.

    Under a new Medicare, seniors would be able to choose health plans that best suit their needs, including the option to stick with the employer-sponsored plan they had pre-retirement. Finally, standards for consumer protection would imitate and possibly exceed those set by the FEHBP.

    By relying on market forces, these reforms would ensure that seniors would receive stable, quality health benefits while creating savings and putting Medicare on a sustainable path. To read more about Moffit and Capretta’s transformative vision for a better Medicare, click here.

    Posted in Obamacare [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Breaking Health Care Research: A New Way Forward in Medicare Reform

    1. Pingback: » Financial News Update – 12/14/10 NoisyRoom.net: The Progressive Hunter

    2. Don Ewing, Utah says:

      Makes too much sense, would save Medicare while saving money for all recipients and taxpayers. Govt. will never go for a system that works for the good of the citizens.

    3. Bobbie says:

      This :patient protection affordable care act" is nothing the people were told by the man forcing it on us. Where is the law? it's fraud! He refuses all ideas that are sound and reasonable that hold a person responsible for themselves.

      "government oversight ensures consumer protection and transparency?" I believe it once did, but today, they're giving away our personal, private information like hot cocoa. "Transparency" should come before "consumer protection…" "government oversight" needs discipline if we have to constantly oversee government!

      How dare anyone think to micro manage when it comes to care or medicine. I've witnessed the overlapping, the confusion, the idle one who will watch a patent die just because it wasn't their job to do anything about it. Where you go to your primary doctor with 10 different symptoms and he sends you to 10 different doctors, when all symptoms lead to one diagnosis.

      There is no intercommunication between the medical staff. You're interviewed by one staff member, another assistant, another assistant to the assistant all the same questions. Efficient would be one to interview and relay information to the necessary others, with no assistance. Then they'll know what questions haven't been asked and aren't overwhelming the patient.

      It's dangerous as the more people the greater chance of lack and miscommunication.

    4. Pingback: World Spinner

    5. Pingback: A New Way Forward in Medicare Reform | Citizens to Repeal Obamacare

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×