• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Mayor Bloomberg Imposes a Victim Tax on New Yorkers

    Times Square, New York City

    Starting next summer, New Yorkers will get hit with a tax that is hard to believe even in the already overly-taxed metropolis of Manhattan. Firefighters will begin charging accident victims for their emergency services to the tune of hundreds of dollars, even if the victim was not at fault.

    Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s (I) newest tax would charge residents $490 for a car fire or accident with injury, $415 for a car fire without injury and $365 for any vehicle accident without injury. (New Yorkers must be relieved to know that they get $50 discount for not being injured!)

    Beyond the economic absurdity, it is very obvious why this tax is such a bad deal. It discourages victims from reporting accidents, and even fires, and if reported, discourages victims from acknowledging injuries which may be life-threatening.

    Some call it the “Crash Tax” but that unfairly presents the “event” itself as being taxed, as opposed to the victim. Words and integrity matter, and Mayor Bloomberg should be honest about who is paying the bill for the city’s fiscal incompetence.

    Emergency services are a basic function of governance. The case could be made that those who drive recklessly or are repeatedly cited offenders could be deterred by a fee of some sort or increased citation fines. But this across-the-board tax is not designed for public safety, but rather to pay for out-of-control government spending.

    Mayor Bloomberg has long proven himself to be a cheerleader for tax hikes and big-government interventions. Earlier this year, Bloomberg proposed taxing sugar drinks a penny an ounce since the Mayor takes issue with any city resident enjoying a Coca-Cola.

    But his latest Victim Tax is a new low. It’s hard to contemplate how the FDNY will collect their new taxes. Will brave firefighters now have to carry around a credit card machine? Will the heroes of September 11 be forced to consider someone’s economic viability before responding to an emergency? Firefighters should not be put in this position, nor should their jobs be made harder by discouraging prompt and smart calls of distress.

    New York City residents already hand over more than half of their paycheck to Empire State tax collectors for combined federal, state and city taxes. Any visitor to Manhattan knows the cost of the city’s exorbitant hotel taxes that discourage tourism. You also have the highest-in-the-nation cigarette tax, the banking corporation tax, the commercial motor vehicle tax, the commercial rent tax, the cell phone tax, the general corporation tax, the horse race admissions tax, the mortgage recording tax, the taxicab license tax, utility taxes, retail taxes and so on.

    Mayor Bloomberg is facing a $4.5 billion budget deficit next year. This fiscal irresponsibility should not be put on the backs of those needing medical attention from heroic first responders.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Mayor Bloomberg Imposes a Victim Tax on New Yorkers

    1. Pingback: » Mayor Bloomberg Imposes a Victim Tax on New Yorkers | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. MySquawk

    2. Pingback: » Sunday Weekly Summary MySquawk

    3. Jill, California says:

      This is outrageous! The FDNY should be united in opposition against this tax and should refuse to cooperate with Mayor Bloomberg.

      This not only harms the people of New York, it also harms the firefighters. Anytime citizens delay calling 911 to report an emergency, it increases the potential for an incident to spiral out of control. This is particularly true with fires. What might have been easily managed in the early stages becomes more difficult and more dangerous because of the delayed reporting.

      Mayor Bloomberg will have blood on his hands if he imposes this tax.

      It's time for the citizens of New York … and citizens nationwide … to say no to our out-of-control government. We, not they, should be deciding how much we want to pay in taxes and how we want our tax money spent.

    4. Bobbie says:

      How dare they CHARGE the victim or the service to survive them!

      In this state there is a "victims of crime fund" where victims get expenses covered and other cash at tax payers expense. Too much fraud under government. This should only be a charitable event as people have and will make themselves victim just for the benefit. Sad, isn't it?

    5. Bobbie says:

      cruelty to humanity…

    6. Mark, Atlanta says:

      Have they thought about requiring this as part of insurance coverage in auto accidents? After all, if we pay for liability coverage, collision coverage, etc why not add a very small piece to the coverage for ambulance service. Of course the big insurance fat cats like AIG would object saying people would then ask to be taken to the hospital…just the opposite claimed in the article.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×