• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • New Direction for Education Policy in the House

    When the 112th Congress convenes in January, the House Education and Labor Committee will have a new chairman with a strong record of reform: Representative John Kline of Minnesota.

    In a press release statement earlier today, Kline stated:

    My goal for the federal programs and agencies that oversee our schools and workplaces is to provide certainty and simplicity. We must ensure federal red tape does not become the enemy of innovation, and that federal mandates do not become roadblocks on the path to reform.

    Kline has a solid history of standing for principles and policies that empower students, families, and teachers instead of Washington bureaucracy.

    Earlier this year, Kline pushed against national education standards and assessments, which would encroach upon state and local authority to determine what children are taught in the classroom. He stated:

    This is the U.S. Department of Education, putting [out its] view of what needs to be done. … It’s not the states deciding. It’s not local control.

    Furthermore, he noted:

    That’s not our [the federal government’s] job. … If you’re starting to put the federal government in charge of assessments, standards, you’re moving in a way that I don’t think Americans want.

    Kline has been a co-sponsor of the A-PLUS Act, which would allow states to opt out of the federal bureaucratic tangles of No Child Left Behind and allow states to direct funding to their most pressing education needs.

    Going forward, Kline says that he plans to eliminate or consolidate the myriad of programs in the Department of Education that “just are not working.” Furthermore, he said of plans to reauthorize No Child Left Behind, “We need to make sure school districts and states have more flexibility and we’re not dictating from Washington.” Similarly, the Grand Forks Herald reports that Kline plans to “find ways to ‘fix failing schools’ without undermining local control.”

    Decades of Washington policies that have increased federal red tape in the nation’s education system have failed to improve schools that are in critical need of reform. Kline has a track record of trying to break through the bureaucracy to give authority to those closest to students and improve education for school children in the United States.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    9 Responses to New Direction for Education Policy in the House

    1. Don Deibler II Eliza says:

      Seems like Rep Kline should contact Michelle Rhee of StudentsFirst.org. Together maybe they can get this country back on the right track and the Feds out of education

    2. Pingback: Tweets that mention The Foundry: Conservative Policy News. -- Topsy.com

    3. George Colgrove, VA says:

      "Going forward, Kline says that he plans to eliminate or consolidate the myriad of programs in the Department of Education that “just are not working.” "

      Can one then assume the department of education can be closed then?

    4. Chuck In Larkspur, C says:

      Eliminate the Department of Education and you accomplish two goals: first you eliminate the federal governments intrusion into local schools and you start cutting the spending to get expenses below expected revenues.

    5. Bill, Kansas City, M says:

      The federal government has no business being involved in the education of pour children. That is a local and state issue, not for the feds. The only the thing the fed does is throw money at the education system and demand stupid standards for everyone. Over the last 30 some odd years, we have seen how well that has worked.

    6. Spiritof76, NH says:

      Rep. Kline, please complete the total job and reduce deficit at the same time-defund the Dept. of Education.

    7. TiltedTalkDomagoy - says:

      I agree with George. Don't just give states more wiggle room – shut down the whole department of education. If "That’s not our [the federal government’s] job." is true (which it is), then it needs to go away. If that's not possible, then start to get rid of it piece by piece

      I'm also disappointed that only NCLB was mentioned. "Head Start" is a proven failure and has cost us tens of billions of dollars. How about killing that program?

    8. Gail, Beverly, MA says:

      Let's hope that this gentleman can help turn around the federal bureaucracy's stranglehold on public education.

    9. Norcross schools says:

      Go get the Feds out of education and everything else they have no business meddling in.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.