• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • California Squirms with CIRM: The Embryonic Stem Cell Boondoggle

    Centrally planned job creation and scientific research pose many of the same problems: extraordinary expense, a pattern of politically shaped insider transactions, and less than promising results. This occurs for substantially the same reason: government attempts to pick winners and losers in developing fields ignore the discipline of the marketplace and the wisdom of personal investment.

    Consider the story of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). California voters approved Proposition 71 in 2004, which authorized the creation of the institute and permitted it to raise up to $3 billion in bond funding for grants over a 10-year period to pursue the promise of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) and human cloning. At the time of the vote, federal funds for ESCR were limited under a Bush Administration policy issued in August 2001, and no federal funds at all were available for research involving human clones.

    The campaign for Prop 71, as well as the 2004 presidential campaign, deployed powerful images promising miracle cures from these lines of research. Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards captured public attention in October of that year speaking just after the death of the actor Christopher Reeve, who had suffered severe injury in an equestrian accident. Edwards famously said, “If we do the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to walk again. Get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.”

    Claims like these, also repeated in the heavily funded campaign for Prop 71, proved hard to resist in California and Missouri, which approved a similar ballot measure in 2006.

    As the funds began to flow under Prop 71, a series of problems began to emerge. In addition to California’s burgeoning budget woes, the CIRM found itself embroiled in headlines in the state’s major papers about its extraordinarily high salaries, pattern of approving grants to universities that were represented on the governing body making funding determinations, and employment of former state political leaders as liaisons with the legislative bodies they had once served.

    The biggest problem, however, was the lack of progress in terms of safe and effective human therapies resulting from CIRM’s work. In fact, by 2009 the failure to produce human therapeutic benefits using the embryonic cells, whose derivation is ethically controversial, led CIRM to redeploy the majority of its funding to the ethically uncontroversial alternative of adult stem cell research, whose derivation does not depend on the destruction of human embryos.

    Over time voters began to perceive that the promise of overnight miracles was, to say the least, exaggerated. In 2007 New Jersey voters rejected then-Governor Jon Corzine’s proposal to spend $450 million in taxpayer dollars on ESCR. But California remains locked into a 10-year spending commitment. Now, the prime sponsor of the 2004 initiative, Bob Klein, who has become a $150,000-a-year employee of CIRM, has announced that he will seek another voter-approved infusion of $3 billion in 2014. Even the Los Angeles Times seems skeptical.

    Advocates of such initiatives, not to mention less intrinsically controversial ideas like wind farms and ethanol, have a basic conundrum to overcome: If an industry or research project is as remotely revolutionary and cost-effective as they say it is, isn’t it the kind of enterprise most likely to draw major venture capital and not compromise the public trust? And isn’t the wisdom of the marketplace, not the proximity of certain participants to political figures and the public treasury, the best way to separate the truth from fiction, the phenomenal from the merely fanciful?

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to California Squirms with CIRM: The Embryonic Stem Cell Boondoggle

    1. don margolis says:

      Excellent, if mild, article on the subject. May I add a point or two?

      First–Klein has stated he only wants a cure for his son's diabetes, but his money-making crocodile tears about his son are just that. ADULT stem cell doctors in the USA and Latin America have cured the disease that Klein pretends to worry about (in some cases) and in most cases improved their lives. If he really wanted his son better he would fly him down to South America and get a PROVEN stem cell treatment for him. However his objective never was cures, it was and is MONEY.

      CIRM's President Trounson gets $500k a year because he is a well-proven professional con man. The ONLY thing he was renowned in Australia for was lying, which made him perfect for the 10,000 mile trip to California. First, to newspapers in Adelaide, claiming that embryonic stem cells (hESC) do not cause cancer. Second, as another hoaxer in South Korea got nailed for, Trounson phonied up data from the trial he was in charge of. But he's worth the half million as the perfect con man. Why else would California ignore thousands of American scientists and bring in a lying crook?

      Remember, hundreds of embryonic lying "scientists" are the ones who said "If George Bush weren't president, Christopher Reeve would be walking today"—-in 2004! Or how about "As soon as Bush leaves the White House, the cures will come pouring out of the pipeline."

      There are no embryonic cures. There will be no embryonic cures. And, most importantly, these professional money grubbers constantly hide the fact from a trusting public that adult stem cells have ALREADY improved the lives of more people around the world than embryonics will help in the next fifty years—AND THEY KNOW IT!

      For very clear reasons WHY the cures will never come, read "A Grim Fairy Tale" at http://repairstemcells.org/Community/Dons-Corner/

      Don Margolis, Chairman

      Repair Stem Cell Institute

    2. Barry N. Schmidt, Sa says:

      …and yet another reason why California continues its slide into total bankruptcy, provided the federal government doesn't step in to "help" by dunning taxpayers in other states to reward California's many failures such as stem cell research. A billion here and a billion there, and soon you're talking about real money…OURS!

    3. Larry Welch, Idaho says:

      Today being Thanksgiving, this report underscores the wisdom of free market forces in its echo of the lessons learned at the "Pilgrim's Plantation". Central planning for use of community resources fails yet again.

    4. TJS, FL says:

      Another example of government picking winners and losers, contrary to the demands of the market. Embryonic stem cells are inferior to adult stem cells. Even California is starting to figure that out. Too bad they wasted $3 billion so far ($6 billion after they pay back the bonds, IF they pay back the bonds).

      Every time government does something because the private market would not do it, it is a waste of money. If it's worth doing, the private sector will do it, with the exception of megaprojects.

    5. Pingback: Morning Bell: Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    6. Pingback: Lincoln’s Thanksgiving Proclamation | The Conservative Papers

    7. JamesRWII, Austin says:

      "If an industry or research project is as remotely revolutionary and cost-effective as they say it is, isn’t it the kind of enterprise most likely to draw major venture capital and not compromise the public trust?"

      The money is in continued treatment, not curative medicine. No big pharma company would be interested in curing their best customers . . .

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×