• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Czechs Increase Afghan Deployment

    As NATO leaders head to the alliance’s summit in Lisbon later this month, they should applaud the Czech Republic for increasing their troop contribution to the mission in Afghanistan during one of the most crucial periods for the counterinsurgency strategy.

    In December 2009, President Obama announced that America would deploy an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan. Great Britain, Poland, Georgia, South Korea, and Italy pulled together a further 7,000 troops to support the population-centric strategy. However, France, Germany, Belgium, and other European countries once again failed to equitably share the burden of the nine-year-old war.

    There remains incredible frustration over the inequitable burden-sharing among the NATO allies in Afghanistan. NATO’s Continental European members have provided too few troops with too many national caveats on their deployments, and in some cases, undeclared caveats have also been imposed. European support for the civilian component of the comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan approved at NATO’s Bucharest summit in 2008 has also been unforthcoming with embedded trainers, Operational Mentor and Liaison Teams and other Afghan trainers in short supply.

    Announcing the additional Czech deployment, Defense Minister Alexandr Vondra—a longstanding friend of the United States—stated that it is a “sign of our responsibility toward our own security and the security of our allies.” President Obama should make a point of recognizing this when he sees Prime Minister Petr Necas at the summit in Lisbon and continue to press NATO’s other European allies to also step up to the plate.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Czechs Increase Afghan Deployment

    1. Joanna Johns, Oregon says:

      I find it particularly despicable that Mitch Mc Connell finds it acceptable to have "shared goals" now that those goals are Republican goals. Where was he and his party when Americans were in the throes of the worst recession we have had in recent history and he and his party stood against every item of business our country needed support for to get us back on track earlier than the 2010 election. The Republican agenda is transparent and it is politics, not caring for Americans, that drives the Republican machine. Not every American supports your "shared goal". The only shared goal I support is that you find an exit stratedgy. Every time you say Americans want you to do something remember I am one American that does not want you to do anything unless you can leave your political agenda at the door.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.