• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A Confident Coalition of Economic and Social Conservatives

    Exit polls and candidate victory speeches confirm the truth that yesterday’s electoral outcomes were rooted in concerns about a sagging economy and soaring government spending. But the public records and political philosophies of yesterday’s victors at the ballot box also convey the quiet strength of social issues in the 2010 election. A confident coalition has emerged with a convergence of convictions.

    The freshman class of congressional Members elected yesterday is the most socially conservative since at least the 1980 class elected on Ronald Reagan’s coattails. The 1980 class included a raft of Senators (like James Abdnor of South Dakota, Jeremiah Denton of Alabama, Mack Mattingly of Georgia, Dan Quayle of Indiana, and Chuck Grassley of Iowa) who defeated liberal incumbents, including icons like George McGovern. A generation later, naturally enough, the sons (Evan Bayh, Chet Culver, and Ben Quayle) of several of the major figures in the 1980 cycle (Birch Bayh, John Culver, and Quayle) played diverse roles in a new conservative resurgence in Washington and the state houses.

    The analysis of the 2010 returns by several of the leading social issue organizations underscores that they are as pleased with the results as any of the Tea Party and grassroots economic groups that mobilized effectively this year. The Susan B. Anthony List, described by The Wall Street Journal as “the lone conservative group” in the top five independent groups involved in the 2010 election, is celebrating the defeat of five of the six House Members who defected on the key vote on elective abortion funding last March, the election of four pro-life women governors, including the nation’s first Hispanic female governor, and a net change of 15 in the balance of pro-life women in Congress, including the new Senator from New Hampshire, Kelly Ayotte, a “fiscal and social conservative.”

    The results were similar favorable for advocates of traditional marriage. The most important election on the 2010 ballot nationwide was the retention vote for three Iowa Supreme Court justices who installed same-sex marriage in the Hawkeye State by judicial decree in April 2009. All three were defeated by margins approaching nine percentage points, a sharp rebuke to judicial activism that will reverberate across the U.S. legal community. The removal of the justices is the first in Iowa since 1962, when the state adopted the merit selection system for state judicial appointments.

    Commentary over the past several months has featured numerous examples of pundits attempting to devalue the significance of an integrated framework of social, economic, and defense conservatism. But the 2010 election results do not reflect such divisions. The truth is that key elements of contemporary conservatism overlap and reinforce one another, as the institutions of civil society that depend directly on virtue and habits of character cooperate with and strengthen the processes of limited government and fiscal restraint.

    As economist Jennifer Roback Morse has phrased it, “It is simply not possible to have a low-impact government in a society with no social or legal norms about family structure, sexual behavior, and childrearing. The state will have to provide support for people with loose or non-existent ties to their families. So, in the long run, a free society needs marriage.”

    The evidence suggests that this message was also part of yesterday’s historic election.

    Posted in Culture [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to A Confident Coalition of Economic and Social Conservatives

    1. Paul Rinderle says:

      Excellent incite.

      You just cannot divorce a viable government from social truths.

      Social truths are the underlying/reinforcing strength of a successful government.

    2. Pingback: The Cloakroom » The 112th Congress: Conservative and Liberal Lines Get Less Blurry

    3. Pingback: ADF Alliance Alert » A confident coalition of economic and social conservatives

    4. Pingback: FRC Blog » The Social Conservative Review: The Insider’s Guide to Pro-Family News–November 5, 2010

    5. sunforester says:

      Be very, very careful about what is considered "social norms" about marriage. One person's normal is another person's abomination. And don't give me this garbage about there being no social norms in our country, either. I am proud to live in a country where I can still have my own opinion on what is the right thing to do for myself and my family, and live that way as well.

      Just because we are starting to extricate a bunch of Washington socialist know-it-alls who love to tell us what to do, doesn't mean there is now a big, beautiful vacuum where another bunch of equally socialist know-it-alls can come in and tell us all the new social norm we now have to follow.

      We regular folks know what it takes to live our own lives as best as possible, and it is US who will decide the "social norm" not YOU. You people at Heritage are just itching to install a pro-marriage agenda that is no less dictatorial than the opposing agenda foisted upon us by government-centric, anti-religion progressives.

      You are welcome to help remove government as a substitute marriage partner, and I have absolutely no problem with marriage being defined as a union between a man and a woman. However, you are hereby warned that any other agitation for marriage as a government-driven end for us independent, free-thinking Americans is bound for outright rejection.

      For people who talk big about individual liberty and independence, you are sure trying hard to box us in when it comes to your precious social issues.

      Help us get government out of our lives. Get yourselves out of our lives while you're at it, also.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×