• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • This Halloween, Undead (Treaties) Haunt the Halls of the Senate

    No, the undead aren’t Senators worried about the outcome of next Tuesday’s election. Nor are they the bodies of the departed, reanimated to feast upon the living. Citizens in the U.S. Capitol aren’t in any danger —well, no more danger than usual, anyhow—of having their brains sucked out and devoured. Rather, the undead in this case are treaties signed by Presidents past, treaties that are dead but yet still alive. Call them zombie treaties.

    In order for a treaty to have domestic effect as law in the United States, they have to—in most cases—go through three steps. First, the President has to negotiate and sign the treaty.  Second, the Senate has to give its advice and consent to the treaty (commonly known as ‘ratifying’ it). And third, usually, the House and Senate have to pass implementing legislation that makes the necessary alterations and additions to existing U.S. law. Zombie treaties are treaties that received presidential signature years ago, but have not gained the advice and consent of the Senate.

    For example, President Clinton signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1993. It remains unratified. So does the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials (commonly known as CIFTA), signed in 1997. So does the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, signed in 1996, which the Senate declined to ratify in 1999. So does the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, signed in 1995. And so does the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, signed by President Carter in 1980.

    As the Comprehensive Test Ben Treaty shows, rejection by the Senate is not enough to kill a zombie treaty. Something more powerful is needed, for while these zombie treaties live a shadowy existence, they do matter. Because the U.S. has signed them, it is obligated under international law to avoid taking actions that run counter to their object and purpose. Furthermore, Presidents can use this obligation to justify changing administrative rules, or participating [1] as observers to treaty conferences or in subsidiary bodies created by the treaty. In short, signed but unratified treaties, even though they have not received the advice and consent of the Senate, can shape both U.S. domestic and diplomatic practice.

    The time has come to put an end to the ghastly un-life of the zombie treaties. The Senate is a deliberative body, and it must be allowed a reasonable amount of time to consider the merits and flaws of a treaty. Similarly, Administrations must be allowed a reasonable amount of time to make the case for a signed treaty, and to work constructively with the Senate to craft a resolution of ratification that meets its concerns. But this process should not be allowed to continue indefinitely.

    If a signed treaty has not received ratification after four years—one presidential term—or if the full Senate declines by vote to give its advice and consent to a signed treaty, the President should be required, by law, to notify the authority responsible for the treaty that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the treaty. Commonly known as “un-signing” a treaty, this is a legal process that would free the U.S. from its obligations under international law as they pertain to that treaty. Un-signing is not an act of unilateralism: it is, on the contrary, a demonstration of respect for international law, for the treaty-making process, and for the fact that—under the Constitution—the President’s power to negotiate treaties that bind the U.S. is subject to the approval of the states, as represented in the Senate.

    What is truly disrespectful is allowing these zombie treaties to linger on, dead but still alive, shaping our conduct as a state without having gained the approval of the Senate. It is time to put them out of their misery.

    Happy Halloween!

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to This Halloween, Undead (Treaties) Haunt the Halls of the Senate

    1. K. Llewellyn, San Jo says:

      Treaties like the UN convention on the Rights of the Child are not understood by many as acts that will gravely affect citizens of the U.S. We can't afford to let them live or be ratified if we want to maintain our own sovereignty as free people, able to exercise our own choices in things like the rearing of our own children. UN Treaties in general open us up to governance by those who are not our friends–as in the majority of members of the UN.

    2. C.B. Salmon, St. Pau says:

      There is much danger in allowing unratified treaties to live immortal lives. It is frightening to know that the international community could at any time seek to enforce an unratified treaty and that this act could be viewed as legitimate. This threat has no place in our society because it is hostile to our founding principles. If this threat comes to fruition we

      will be bound to deny our own democracy and thererfore become very vulnerable as a nation. It is abhorrent to allow unratified treaties to linger indefinitely when, as said in the article, we can simply "un-sign" the treaties. Why do we wait when the solution proves to be simple, non-obtrusive, effective and final… .

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×