• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • 300 Economists Counter White House Claim on Taxes

    According to a recent White House video explaining the administration’s opposition to extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Austan Goolsbee claims:

    “If you ask objective economists and analysts around the country about what is effective you will find that everyone agrees that these giant tax cuts for very high income people are the least effective thing that we can do to get the economy growing.”

    Everyone agrees?

    If your definition of objective economists is limited to the White House’s economic team, then perhaps this statement could be true. Unless you also count Obama’s former Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, who suggested extending what many refer to as the Bush tax cuts for the next two years.

    Then there is the 362,000-member National Taxpayers Union, which sent a letter to Congress on last month signed by 313 economists, including a Nobel laureate, in support of extending all of the 2001 and 2003 the tax cuts. As Pete Sepp, NTU’s executive vice president, explained at The Bloggers Briefing:

    “The issue of extending taxpayer relief laws is not a fringe issue. … There is a large body of the economic community saying this is your only option right now. This is by far your best option. Not doing it, even for some individuals, is what these economists would call an anti-stimulus.”

    Economists at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis estimated the effects of the Obama tax hikes and reached a similar conclusion that employment and growth of the economy cannot be made through higher taxes.

    The reality for Goolsbee is that seldom, if ever, does everyone agree about anything, especially when it comes to governing. There isn’t unanimous agreement on the Bush tax cuts among economists, nor is there likely to be.

    Before members of Congress returned to their districts to campaign for re-election, there was enough support from objective economists and analysts to convince a number of Democrats to break ranks with the White House and come out in support of extending all the Bush tax cuts. For all his discussion about widespread agreement, that’s a point Goolsbee failed to appreciate: The only bipartisan agreement that does exist is actually in disagreement with him.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to 300 Economists Counter White House Claim on Taxes

    1. Matt, Dallas,TX says:

      I don't think it's just Economists that disagree: I think a lot of other people do too!
      These taxes have gotten out of hand.
      it's time to put an end to all this!!

    2. John Eley says:

      It seems pretty clear that the Obama position on taxes is all about politics and not about economics. His stand is simply part of his class warfare politics, which for as a ward healer from Chicago is the only politics that he knows and likes. Here as in so many others cases, e.g. his stance on drilling in the Gulf, he plays politics and ignores science. Given the record of the Bush administration those who might have expected real change must have their hopes frustrated. To those of us who were never naive about this, none of this comes as a surprise.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×