• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Grozny Suicide Attack: Violence in North Caucasus Undermines the Pro-Kremlin Ruler

    The suicide bomber attack on the Chechen Parliament in Grozny Tuesday morning cast further doubt on the Russian leadership’s declarations that the strategic North Caucasus region, Russia’s soft underbelly, is stabilizing. More trouble is in stock for Moscow and her South Caucasus neighbors (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan), as the violence in Chechnya, Daghestan and elsewhere escalates.

    According to Al-Jazeera, six people were killed and 10 were wounded Tuesday morning during an assault on Chechnya’s parliament, a symbol of Russia-backed power.  Chechnya is ruled by 34 year-old Ramzan Kadyrov, a pro-Kremlin strongman.

    The attack began when a suicide bomber exploded himself outside of the parliament building, while gunmen shot their way in, killing three people in a standoff. Whether they were killed Kadyrov’s security forces, or blew themselves up when special forces stormed the building, is unknown. Rashid Nurgaliyev, Russia’s Minister of Interior, along with a delegation of regional legislators, was in the Chechen parliament building when it was attacked.

    What is certain, however, is that this assault, following on the heels of an insurgent attack on President Kadyrov’s home village of Tsentoroi two months ago, challenges Russian assertions that President Kadyrov’s harsh approach toward insurgents has made Chechnya a stable region.

    Russian political figures—even after the attack—are trying to spin the incident as a garden-variety “terrorist act,”arguing that the terrorists have no political, religious, or economic affiliations and that the country’s stability is indisputable.

    But Russian analysts believe that the insurgents are using a new strategy, attacking Kadyrov’s symbols of power and undermining his credibility. Carnegie’s Alexei Malashenko believes that such an action is a “slap to the face” to Chechnya’s president, who promised that Chechnya was under (his) control, only to have his parliament assaulted and breached by separatist terrorists.

    The attack was particularly harmful to Kadyrov’s tough-guy reputation because it occurred during a visit by high-ranking Interior Ministry officials from Moscow. Kadyrov won’t win any points in the Kremlin after Tuesday’s events.

    Russian leaders often claimed that they need control of South Caucasus, namely Georgia, to protect the volatile North Caucasus. Just two months ago, Russian military forces established S-300 surface-to-air missile installations in Abkhazia, a separatist Georgian province which unilaterally proclaimed independence after Russia’s invasion in 2008. The missiles are clearly there as a projection of Russian military and political power.

    The assault in Grozny demonstrates that there is no value to the 19th century-style, great-power foreign policy and military power projection beyond Russian borders when Moscow cannot control Islamist terrorists inside its own territory. Long-range anti-aircraft missiles are impotent against suicide bombers and trained terrorists.

    It is equally important to remember that the North Caucasus suicide bombers and murderers are part of a global Islamist threat, which benefits from international ideological inspiration, Salafi/Wahhabi education (mostly in the Middle East and Pakistan), and, at least partially, from foreign funding.

    The insurgents pursue an Islamist agenda, which includes creation of the Caucasus Emirate from the Black Sea to the Caspian. If created, such an emirate will jeopardize pipelines for the Caspian oil and threaten secular regimes, such as Azerbaijan’s.

    The insurrection’s leader, Doku Umarov, proclaims himself an ‘Amir’, an Islamic military leader. Umarov’s insurgents declare that they are fighting “a Jihad in the name of Allah.”

    Russian officials repeatedly said that the West (meaning, the U.S.) is supporting the North Caucasus insurgents. Nothing is further from the truth. An emirate in the North Caucasus will undermine stability in southeastern Europe and threaten U.S. friends in South Caucasus.

    Instead of using military power projection to threaten neighbors, the Kremlin should work to undermine extremists’ legitimacy in the region and to disrupt overseas support of Islamist operations in North Caucasus.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to The Grozny Suicide Attack: Violence in North Caucasus Undermines the Pro-Kremlin Ruler

    1. dannyroberts Phoenix says:

      until we look at islam and what it really represents and what a danger

      that type of mindset is to western culture and our country's stability, or to be more politically correct, until we look at radical islam with their jihads and what they are doing in France, Germany and other countries,

      we will continue to deny the truth of whats really going on here.

      you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out, you just have to open your eyes and see the truth for what it is and deal with it.

      our government so far is trying to bury it's head in the sand, but trust me the american people know whats up. they are not stupid.

      look at NPR and the Juan Williams debacle,it's time to wake up the sleeping giant, God bless America.

    2. ZviadKavteli says:

      Corrupt Kremlin regime wants to destroy the neighboring democracies, particularly Georgian. Sooner or later Russians will ask Putin, "how come Georgian are better off than Russians, even though Georgia has no oil and gas". Sooner or later Russians will tell Putin, "democracy works; it works for Georgia; it will work for Russia; we want democracy; we want free elections; we don't want you any more".

      This is why Kremlin is trying to kill to rabits with one shot: "terrorism in Russia is sponsored by Georgia and the West". I hope Russians are smart enough to understand the Kremlin manipulations and lies. I hope Russian people demand freedom and democracy.

    3. Joel says:

      Couldn't be composed any more effective. Reading this article reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this blog post to him. Fairly sure he will have a excellent read. Cheers for discussing! My kind regards, Joel.

    4. Pingback: World Spinner

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×